SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Business and Management Studies: An International Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

EXAMINING THE LEVEL OF OCCUPATIONAL MOTIVATION OF ACADEMICIANS IN THE CONTEXT OF DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES

AKADEMİSYENLERİN MESLEKİ MOTİVASYON DÜZEYİNİN DEMOGRAFİK DEĞİŞKENLER BAĞLAMINDA İNCELENMESİ

Emel BAHAR
Onur ÖZBOZKURT
Pages
575–598
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, it has been determined that the level of occupational motivation of academicians differs statistically significant in terms of types of institution employed, years of employment at the current institution, and academic units.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The level of occupational motivation of academic staff is a significant resource as the pillars of an entire building and play a central role in the fulfillment of the organizational goals of their institutions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the data obtained from the questionnaire has been applied on 175 academicians have been analyzed via the “SPSS 26.0” program.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, it has been determined that the level of occupational motivation of academicians differs statistically significant in terms of types of institution employed, years of employment at the current institution, and academic units.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The level of occupational motivation of academic staff is a significant resource as the pillars of an entire building and play a central role in the fulfillment of the organizational goals of their institutions. In this frame, this study has been carried out within the purpose of being guided for the practices of universities as desired benefits center and contributed to the literature via determining the level of occupational motivation of academicians who have a crucial role in the point of being provided benefit, conducted the activities of research and development, and produced science in addition to the educational activities expected from universities. For this purpose, the data obtained from the questionnaire has been applied on 175 academicians have been analyzed via the “SPSS 26.0” program. As a result of the analysis, it has been identified that the level of occupational motivation of academicians does not differ statistically significant in terms of age, gender, marital status, title, years in the profession, and field of the study. On the other hand, it has been determined that the level of occupational motivation of academicians differs statistically significant in terms of types of institution employed, years of employment at the current institution, and academic units.

Özet

Akademisyenlerin mesleki motivasyon düzeyi, bir binanın tamamını taşıyan sütunları kadar önemli birer kaynak olma niteliği taşımakta ve kurumlarının organizasyonel amaçlarının gerçekleştirilmesinde merkezi bir rol oynamaktadır. Bu çerçevede, bu çalışma, üniversitelerden beklenen eğitim-öğretim faaliyetlerine ek olarak, bilim üretilmesi, araştırma-geliştirme faaliyetlerinin yapılması ve topluma fayda sağlanması noktasında kilit rol üstlenen akademisyenlerin mesleki motivasyon düzeylerinin tespit edilerek hem literatüre katkı sunulması hem de fayda merkezi olması arzu edilen üniversitelerdeki uygulamalara rehberlik edilmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, akademisyenlerin mesleki motivasyon düzeyinin ölçülmesi noktasında 175 akademisyen üzerinde uygulanan anket sonucunda elde edilen veriler, “SPSS 26.0” programı vasıtasıyla analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonucunda ise, akademisyenlerin mesleki motivasyon düzeyinin, yaş, cinsiyet, medeni durum, unvan, akademisyen olarak çalışma süresi ve çalışma alanı etmenlerine göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık göstermediği; akademisyenlerin çalışmakta olduğu kurum türü, bulunduğu üniversitede çalışma süresi ve çalışma birimine göre istatistikî olarak anlamlı bir farklılık gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAR, E., ÖZBOZKURT, O. (2020). EXAMINING THE LEVEL OF OCCUPATIONAL MOTIVATION OF ACADEMICIANS IN THE CONTEXT OF DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 575–598. https://ajindex.com/articles/144344

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alfagira, S.A. Bin Zumrah, A. R. Mond Noor, K. B., & Rahman, O. B. A. (2017). Investigating the Factors Influencing Academic Staff Performance: A Conceptual Approach. Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 4(11), 842-848.
  2. Arık, İ. A. (1996). Motivasyon ve Heyecana Giriş. Çantay Kitabevi. Blašková, M., Majchrzak-Lepczyk, J., Hriníková, D., & Blaško, R. (2019). Sustainable Academic Motivation. Sustainability, 11(21), 5934-5957.
  3. Buberwa, E. (2015). Role of Motivation on Academic Staff Performance in Tanzania Public Universities: Underpinning Intrinsic and Extrinsic Facets. European Journal of Business and Management, 7(36), 219-230.
  4. Capelleras, J. L. (2005). Attitudes of academic staff towards their job and organisation: an empirical assessment. Tertiary Education & Management, 11(2), 147-166.
  5. Cheng, M. (2016). Quality in higher education: Developing a virtue of professional practice. Springer. Demir, S., & Akbaba, A. (2018). Akademisyenlerin Mesleki Motivasyonları ile İş Tatmini Arasındaki İlişki. YYÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 15(1), 1256-1286.
  6. Genç, N. (2004). Yönetim ve Organizasyon. Ankara:
  7. Seçkin Yayınevi.
  8. Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (2018). Motivation and Action: Introduction and Overview. Motivation and Action. Springer, Cham. ISBN: 978-3-319-65094-4
  9. Kuchava, M. M., & Buchashvili, G. (2016). Staff Motivation in Private and Public Higher Educational Institutions (Case of International Black Sea University, Sokhumi State University and Akaki Tsereteli State University). Journal of Education & Social Policy, 3(4), 92-100.
  10. Lourdes Machado, M., Soares, V. M., Brites, R., Ferreira, J. B., & Gouveia, O. M. R. (2011). A Look to Academics Job Satisfaction and Motivation in Portuguese Higher Education Institutions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1715-1724.
  11. Malik, E. M., Danish, Q. R. (2010). Impact of Motivation to Learn and Job Attitudes on Organizational Learning Culture in a Public Service Organization of Pakistan. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies. 25(2), 217-235.
  12. Rowley, J. (1996). Motivation and academic staff in higher education. Quality assurance in education. Sağlam, A. Ç. (2007). Akademisyenlerin İşe Güdülenmesinde Hijyen ve Güdüleme Faktörlerinin Önemi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 52-57
  13. Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance. Elsevier. Shaheen, I., Sajid, M. A., & Batool, Q. (2013). Fact