Journals / AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

How Medical AI Readiness, Anxiety, and Attitudes Shape Nursing Students' AI Competence – A Path Analysis

Tıbbi Yapay Zekâ Hazırbulunuşluğu, Kaygı ve Tutumlar Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zekaya Yeterliliğini Nasıl Şekillendiriyor? – Yol Analizi

Pages
164–185
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

AI-focused interventions, along with the creation of a supportive learning environment for nursing students during their practicum, may be key strategies to enhance their AI competence.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study conducted a path analysis to examine the impact of several related variables on artificial intelligence (AI) user competence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The participants included 310 nursing students from a single nursing school in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:AI-focused interventions, along with the creation of a supportive learning environment for nursing students during their practicum, may be key strategies to enhance their AI competence.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapay zeka · Kaygı · Tutum

Abstract

This study conducted a path analysis to examine the impact of several related variables on artificial intelligence (AI) user competence. The participants included 310 nursing students from a single nursing school in Turkey. Hypothetical paths were established to assess the influence of medical artificial intelligence readiness, AI-related anxiety, and both positive and negative attitudes toward AI on AI competence. Positive attitudes toward AI and medical AI readiness had significant effects on AI competence. Additionally, both positive and negative attitudes toward AI had a significant negative effect on AI-related anxiety; however, the total, direct, and indirect effects of anxiety on AI competence were not significant. The model explained 33.5% of the variance in AI user competence. AI-focused interventions, along with the creation of a supportive learning environment for nursing students during their practicum, may be key strategies to enhance their AI competence.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, yapay zeka konusundaki kullanıcı yeterliliği üzerinde etkili olan çeşitli değişkenlerin etkisini öngörmek amacıyla bir yol analizi yapılmıştır. Katılımcılar, Türkiye'deki bir hemşirelik okulundan 310 hemşirelik öğrencisinden oluşmuştur. Bu çalışmada, tıbbi yapay zekâya hazırlık, yapay zekâ kaygısı ve yapay zekâya yönelik hem olumlu hem de olumsuz tutumların yapay zeka yeterliliği üzerindeki etkisine ilişkin varsayımsal yollar oluşturulmuştur. Yapay zekâya yönelik olumlu tutumlar ve tıbbi yapay zekâya hazırlık, yapay zeka yeterliliği üzerinde anlamlı etkilere sahip bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, yapay zekâya yönelik olumlu ve olumsuz tutumların yapay zekâ kaygısı üzerinde anlamlı ve olumsuz bir etkisi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ancak, kaygının yapay zeka yeterliliği üzerindeki toplam etkisi anlamlı bulunmamış; dolaylı ve doğrudan etkiler de anlamlı değildir. Model, yapay zekâ kullanıcı yeterliliğindeki varyansın %33,5’ini açıkladı. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin uygulama eğitimi sırasında sağlık kurumları tarafından destekleyici bir ortam yaratılmasıyla birlikte, yapay zeka odaklı müdahaleler, onların yapay zeka yeterliliklerini artırmada kilit müdahaleler olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çakıcı, H. B., Dolu, İ. (2026). How Medical AI Readiness, Anxiety, and Attitudes Shape Nursing Students' AI Competence – A Path Analysis. AJIT-e: Academic Journal of Information Technology, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 164–185. https://doi.org/10.5824/ajite.2026.02.003.x

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Abou Hashish, E. A., & Alnajjar, H. (2024). Digital proficiency: Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and skills in digital transformation, health literacy, and artificial intelligence among university nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 508. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05482-3
  2. Albino, M. G., Albino, F. S., Asio, J. M. R., & Gadia, E. D. (2025). Influence of AI anxiety on AI self-efficacy among college students. International Journal of Technology in Education, 8(2), 557–573. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.1109
  3. Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Lee, H. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019–2023). Computers and Education Open, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173
  4. AlZaabi, A., & Masters, K. (2025). Assessing medical students' readiness for artificial intelligence after pre-clinical training. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 824. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07008-x
  5. Amin, S. M., El-Fattah Mahgoub, S. A., Tawfik, A. F., Khalil, D. E., El-Sayed, A. A. I., Atta, M. H. R., Albzia, A., & Morsy Mohamed, S. R. (2025). Nursing education in the digital era: The role of digital competence in enhancing academic motivation and lifelong learning among nursing students. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 571. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03199-2
  6. Asio, J. M. R., & Suero, A. N. (2024). Artificial intelligence anxiety, self-efficacy, and self-competence among students: Implications to higher education institutions. Education Policy and Development, 2(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.31098/epd.v2i2.2541
  7. Chen, C., Hu, W., & Wei, X. (2025). From anxiety to action: Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence anxiety and artificial intelligence self-efficacy on motivated learning of undergraduate students. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(4), 3162–3177. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2440877
  8. Chen, S. (2024). Nursing education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Are we ready? Hu Li Za Zhi, 71(5), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202410_71(5).01
  9. Cho, K. A., & Seo, Y. H. (2024). Dual mediating effects of anxiety to use and acceptance attitude of artificial intelligence technology on the relationship between nursing students’ perception of and intention to use them: A descriptive study. BMC Nursing, 23(1), 212. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-01887-z
  10. Cruz, J. P., Sembekova, A., Omirzakova, D., Bolla, S. R., & Balay-odao, E. M. (2023). General attitudes towards and readiness for medical artificial intelligence among medical and health sciences students in Kazakhstan. JMIR Preprints. https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/49536
  11. Dagcan Sahin, N., & Yildirim, M. (2026). Nursing students' experiences with artificial intelligence: A qualitative study on education, clinical practice, and future expectations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 32(2), e70413. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.70413
  12. De Freitas, J., Agarwal, S., Schmitt, B., & Haslam, N. (2023). Psychological factors underlying attitudes toward AI tools. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11), 1845–1854. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01734-2
  13. De Gagne, J. C. (2023). The state of artificial intelligence in nursing education: Past, present, and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4884.
  14. Demir-Kaymak, Z., Turan, Z., Unlu-Bidik, N., & Unkazan, S. (2024). Effects of midwifery and nursing students’ readiness about medical artificial intelligence on artificial intelligence anxiety. Nurse Education in Practice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103994
  15. El Arab, R. A., Alshakihs, A. H., Alabdulwahab, S. H., Almubarak, Y. S., Alkhalifah, S. S., Abdrbo, A., Hassanein, S., & Sagbakken, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in nursing: A systematic review of attitudes, literacy, readiness, and adoption intentions among nursing students and practicing nurses. Frontiers in Digital Health, 7, 1666005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1666005
  16. Faiyazuddin, M., Rahman, S. J. Q., Anand, G., Siddiqui, R. K., Mehta, R., Khatib, M. N., Gaidhane, S., Zahiruddin, Q. S., Hussain, A., & Sah, R. (2025). The impact of artificial intelligence on healthcare: A comprehensive review of advancements in diagnostics, treatment, and operational efficiency. Health Science Reports, 8(1), e70312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.70312
  17. Fahim, Y. A., Hasani, I. W., Kabba, S., & Ragab, W. M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: Clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives. European Journal of Medical Research, 30(1), 848. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-03196-w
  18. Gause, G., Mokgaola, I. O., & Rakhudu, M. A. (2022). Technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education: An integrative review. Curationis, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v45i1.2261
  19. Hassan Mekawy, S., Ali Mohamed Ismail, S., & Zayed Mohamed, M. (2020). Digital health literacy levels among nursing baccalaureate students and their perception and attitudes toward the application of artificial intelligence in nursing. Egyptian Journal of Health Care, 11(1), 1266–1277.
  20. Jallad, S. T., Alsaqer, K., Albadareen, B. I., & Al-Maghaireh, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence tools utilized in nursing education: Incidence and associated factors. Nurse Education Today, 142, 106355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106355
  21. Karaca, O., Çalışkan, S. A., & Demir, K. (2021). Medical artificial intelligence readiness scale for medical students (MAIRS-MS): Development, validity and reliability study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02546-6
  22. Katsantonis, A., & Katsantonis, I. G. (2024). University students’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence: An exploratory study of the cognitive, emotional, and behavioural dimensions of AI attitudes. Education Sciences, 14(9), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14090988
  23. Kavakli, O., & Konukbay, D. (2024). How simulation training for nursing students in emergency internships affects triage decision-making and anxiety: A quasi-experimental study. Heliyon, 10(15).
  24. Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
  25. Kaya, G., Büyükyılmaz, F., Çulha, Y., & Akyürek, P. (2025). Investigation of the relationship between medical artificial intelligence readiness and individual innovativeness levels in nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 151, 106721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106721
  26. Kaya, N., & İşçi, E. (2025). Validity and reliability study of general attitude towards artificial intelligence scale in healthcare. Fenerbahçe University Journal of Health Sciences, 5(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.56061/fbujohs.1531710
  27. Kim, J. J. H., Soh, J., Kadkol, S., et al. (2025). AI anxiety: A comprehensive analysis of psychological factors and interventions. AI and Ethics, 5, 3993–4009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00686-9
  28. Labrague, L. J., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Yboa, B. C., & Sabio, J. B. (2023). Factors influencing student nurses’ readiness to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in their studies and their perceived barriers to accessing AI technology: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 130, 105945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105945
  29. Labrague, L. J., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Yboa, B. C., Sabio, J. B., & de Los Santos, J. A. (2023). Student nurses’ attitudes, perceived utilization, and intention to adopt artificial intelligence technology in nursing practice: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 73, 103815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103815
  30. Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023). AI as an artist? A two-wave survey study on attitudes toward using artificial intelligence in art. Poetics, 101, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101839
  31. Li, Y. L. (2025). The impact of positive attitude towards artificial intelligence and multiple mediation functions of satisfying basic psychological needs. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 44737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28529-x
  32. Nair, S., & Palsetia, S. (2025). A correlational study on attitudes towards artificial intelligence (AI) and anxiety in employees working in IT industry. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 13(2), 4706–4713. https://doi.org/10.25215/1302.416
  33. Papaneophytou, C., & Nicolaou, S. A. (2025). Promoting critical thinking in biological sciences in the era of artificial intelligence: The role of higher education. Trends in Higher Education, 4(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4020024
  34. Park, J., & Woo, S. E. (2022). Who likes artificial intelligence? Personality predictors of attitudes toward artificial intelligence. The Journal of Psychology, 156(1), 68–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2021.2012109
  35. Pellas, N. (2023). The influence of sociodemographic factors on students’ attitudes toward AI-generated video content creation. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00276-4
  36. Rony, M. K. K., Kayesh, I., Bala, S. D., Akter, F., & Parvin, M. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in future nursing care: Exploring perspectives of nursing professionals—A descriptive qualitative study. Heliyon, 10(4).
  37. Russo, C., Romano, L., Clemente, D., Iacovone, L., Gladwin, T. E., & Panno, A. (2025). Gender differences in artificial intelligence: The role of artificial intelligence anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559457
  38. Sağlam, R. K., & Kalanlar, B. (2025). Living with and without AI: A mixed-methods study on AI usage, addiction, and “AIlessphobia” in nursing students. Nurse Education in Practice, 88, 104530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104530
  39. Scantamburlo, T., Cortés, A., Foffano, F., Barrué, C., Distefano, V., Pham, L., & Fabris, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence across Europe: A study on awareness, attitude and trust. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence.
  40. Schiavo, G., Businaro, S., & Zancanaro, M. (2024). Comprehension, apprehension, and acceptance: Understanding the influence of literacy and anxiety on acceptance of artificial intelligence. Technology in Society, 77, 102537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102537
  41. Stănescu, D. F., & Romașcanu, M. C. (2024). The influence of AI anxiety and neuroticism in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 13(4), 191. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2024.v13n4p191
  42. Tam, W., Huynh, T., Tang, A., Luong, S., Khatri, Y., & Zhou, W. (2023). Nursing education in the age of artificial intelligence powered chatbots (AI-chatbots): Are we ready yet? Nurse Education Today, 129, 105917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105917
  43. Taskiran, N. (2023). Effect of artificial intelligence course in nursing on students’ medical artificial intelligence readiness: A comparative quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educator, 48(5), E147–E152. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001446
  44. Wang, B., Rau, P.-L. P., & Yuan, T. (2023). Measuring user competence in using artificial intelligence: Validity and reliability of artificial intelligence literacy scale. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(9), 1324–1337. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2022.2072768
  45. Yalcinkaya, T., Ergin, E., & Yucel, S. C. (2024). Exploring nursing students’ attitudes and readiness for artificial intelligence: A cross-sectional study. Teaching and Learning in Nursing.
  46. Zgambo, M., Costello, M., Buhlmann, M., Maldon, J., Anyango, E., & Adama, E. (2025). Artificial intelligence and academic integrity in nursing education: A mixed methods study on usage, perceptions, and institutional implications. Nurse Education Today, 153, 106796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106796