Journals / ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE / 2017 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

Decolorization of Reactive Yellow 160 Dye by Using Electrocoagulation

Elektrokoagülayon Yöntemiyle Reaktif Yellow 160 Boyar Maddesinin Giderimi

Pages
10–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that, iron electrodes are more cost effective than aluminum electrodes in removal of RY160 dye.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The effect of initial pH, current density, conductivity and electrolysis time on Reactive Yellow 160 (RY160) dye removal was investigated by using electrocoagulation process (EC) equipped with iron and aluminum electrodes couple.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Optimum operational conditions was determined as pH = 5, current density 100 A /m2, electrolysis time 10 min and conductivity 1000 ?S / cm for aluminum electrodes while it was pH = 7, current density 200 A/m2, electrolysis time 5 min and conductivity 1000 ?S/cm for iron electrodes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that, iron electrodes are more cost effective than aluminum electrodes in removal of RY160 dye.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The effect of initial pH, current density, conductivity and electrolysis time on Reactive Yellow 160 (RY160) dye removal was investigated by using electrocoagulation process (EC) equipped with iron and aluminum electrodes couple. High color removal efficiency was obtained independent of electrode materials in EC. Optimum operational conditions was determined as pH = 5, current density 100 A /m2, electrolysis time 10 min and conductivity 1000 ?S / cm for aluminum electrodes while it was pH = 7, current density 200 A/m2, electrolysis time 5 min and conductivity 1000 ?S/cm for iron electrodes. Color removal was 96.4% with 2.3 kWh/m3 energy consumption and 0.52 $/m3 operating cost for aluminum electrode while it was 95.8% with 1.7 kWh/m3 energy consumption and 0,28 $/m3 operating cost for iron electrode. The results show that, iron electrodes are more cost effective than aluminum electrodes in removal of RY160 dye.

Özet

Demir ve alüminyum elektrotlar ile donatılmış elektrokoagülasyon prosesinin (EP) kullanıldığı çalışmada Reaktif Yellow 160 (RY160) boyarmaddesi giderimi üzerine başlangıç pH, akım yoğunluğu, iletkenlik ve elektroliz süresinin etkisi incelenmiştir. EP'de elektrot materyalinden bağımsız olarak yüksek renk giderim verimi elde edilmiştir. Optimum işletme şartları alüminyum elektrot kullanılması durumunda, pH = 5, akım yoğunluğu 100 A/m2, elektroliz süresi 10 dakika, iletkenlik 1000 µS/cm iken demir elektrot kullanılması durumunda pH = 7, akım yoğunluğu 200 A/m2, elektroliz süresi 5 dakika, iletkenlik 1000 µS/cm olarak belirlenmiştir. Renk giderim verimi alüminyum elektrot çifti için 2,3 kWsa/m3 enerji sarfiyatı ve 0,52 $/m3 toplam maliyetle %96,4 iken demir elektrot çifti için 1,7 kWsa/m3 enerji sarfiyatı ve 0,28 $/m3 toplam maliyetle %95,8 elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, demir elektrot kullanımının alüminyum elektrot ile karşılaştırıldığında RY160 boyarmaddesinin gideriminde daha ekonomik olduğunu göstermiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYGÜN, A., EREN, B. (2017). Decolorization of Reactive Yellow 160 Dye by Using Electrocoagulation. ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 10–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/144209

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. M. A. Al-Ghouti, M. A. M. Khraisheh, S. J. Allen, and M. N. Ahmad, "The removal of dyes from textile wastewater: A study of the physical characteristics and adsorption mechanisms of diatomaceous earth," Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 229-238, 2003
  2. Y. Gunes, R. Atav, and O. Namirti, "Effectiveness of ozone in decolorization of reactive dye effluents depending on the dye chromophore," Textile Research Journal, vol. 82, no. 10, pp. 994- 1000, 2011
  3. J. Blanco, F. Torrades, M. Morón, M. Brouta-Agnésa, and J. García-Montaño, "PhotoFenton and sequencing batch reactor coupled to photo-Fenton processes for textile wastewater reclamation: Feasibility of reuse in dyeing processes," Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 240, pp. 469-475, 2014
  4. Y. K. Ong, F. Y. Li, S. P. Sun, B. W. Zhao, C. Z. Liang, and T. S. Chung, "Nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for textile wastewater treatment: Lab-scale and pilot-scale studies," Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 114, pp. 51-57, 2014
  5. F. Ciner, S. K. A. Solmaz, T. Yonar, and G. E. Ustun, "Treatability studies on wastewater from textile dyeing factories in Bursa, Turkey," International Journal of Environment and Pollution, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 403-407, 2003
  6. Y. Uysal, D. Aktas, and Y. Caglar, "Determination of Colour removal efficiency of Lemna minor L. from industrial effluents," Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1718-1726, 2014
  7. Z. Aksu and G. Dönmez, "Combined effects of molasses sucrose and reactive dye on the growth and dye bioaccumulation properties of Candida tropicalis," Process Biochemistry, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2443-2454, 2005
  8. H. S. Rai, M. S. Bhattacharyya, J. Singh, T. K. Bansal, P. Vats, and U. C. Banerjee, "Removal of Dyes from the Effluent of Textile and Dyestuff Manufacturing Industry: A Review of Emerging Techniques With Reference to Biological Treatment," Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 219-238, 2005
  9. H. Kocyigit and A. Ugurlu, "Biological decolourization of reactive azo dye by anaerobic/aerobic sequencing batch reactor system," Global NEST journal, vol. 17, no. X, pp. 1-10, 2015
  10. S. Ozdemir, K. Cirik, D. Akman, E. Sahinkaya, and O. Cinar, "Treatment of azo dyecontaining synthetic textile dye effluent using sulfidogenic anaerobic baffled reactor," Bioresource Technology, vol. 146, pp. 135-143, 2013
  11. C. S. D. Rodrigues, L. M. Madeira, and R. A. R. Boaventura, "