SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Tourism on The Community Residents Quality of Life: The Case of Çeşme

Turizmin Yöre Halkının Yaşam Kalitesine Etkileri: Çeşme İlçesi Örneği

Nilgün AVCI
Pages
164–174
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings of the study, the economic, cultural and social effects of tourism were determined that the local people living in Çeşme affected the quality of life but the environmental effects of tourism did not affect the quality of life.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the study, the effects of tourism on the quality of life of the people living in İzmir’s Cesme district, which is an important tourism destination were investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the research, field research from quantitative research methods was used and data were collected by questionnaire technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings of the study, the economic, cultural and social effects of tourism were determined that the local people living in Çeşme affected the quality of life but the environmental effects of tourism did not affect the quality of life.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the study, the effects of tourism on the quality of life of the people living in İzmir’s Cesme district, which is an important tourism destination were investigated. In the research, field research from quantitative research methods was used and data were collected by questionnaire technique. The samples were gathered face to face from the local people residing in Çeşme by convenience sampling method. Tourism effects were taken as; economic, cultural, social and environmental impacts. Dimensions of quality of life examined as; social, health-safety and economics. In the study, factor analysis, t-test, ANOVA, correlation analyzes were applied and regression analysis was used to determine the effect on the tourism quality of life. According to the findings of the study, the economic, cultural and social effects of tourism were determined that the local people living in Çeşme affected the quality of life but the environmental effects of tourism did not affect the quality of life.

Özet

Bu çalışmada önemli bir turizm destinasyonu olan İzmir’in Çeşme ilçesinde yaşayan yöre halkının yaşam kalitesinde turizmin etkileri araştırılmıştır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden alan araştırması benimsenmiş, verilerin toplanmasında anket tekniği kullanılmıştır. Veriler kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle Çeşme’de ikamet eden yöre halkından yüz yüze toplanmıştır. Turizmin etkileri; ekonomik, kültürel, sosyal ve çevresel etkiler olarak ele alınmıştır. Yaşam kalitesi boyutları da toplumsal yaşam, sağlık-güvenlik ve ekonomik durum olarak incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, faktör analizi, t-testi, ANOVA, korelasyon analizi uygulanmış, turizmin yaşam kalitesine etkisini belirlemek için regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, turizmin ekonomik, kültürel ve sosyal etkilerinin Çeşme’de yaşayan yöre halkının yaşam kalitesini etkilediği, ancak turizmin çevresel etkilerinin yaşam kalitesini etkilemediği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AVCI, N. (2018). The Effect of Tourism on The Community Residents Quality of Life: The Case of Çeşme. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 164–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/144124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Almeida-García, F., Peláez-Fernández, M. Á., BalbuenaVázquez, A. ve Cortés-Macias, R. (2016). Residents’ Perceptions of Tourism Development in Benalmádena (Spain), Tourism Management, 54 (Haziran): 259–274.
  2. Andereck, K. L. ve Nyaupane, G. P. (2011). Exploring the Nature of Tourism and Quality of Life Perceptions among Residents, Journal of Travel Research, 50 (3): 248–260.
  3. Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Knopf, R. C. ve Vogt, C. A. (2005). Residents’ Perceptions of Community Tourism Impacts, Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (4): 1056–1076.
  4. Andereck, K. L., Valentine, K. M., Vogt, C. A. ve Knopf, R. C. (2007). A Cross-cultural Analysis of Tourism and Quality of Life Perceptions, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15 (5): 483–502.
  5. Besculides, A., Lee, M. E. ve McCormick, P. J. (2002). Resident’s Perceptions of the Cultural Benefits of Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 29 (2): 303–319.
  6. Bimonte, S. ve Faralla, V. (2016). Does Residents’ Perceived Life Satisfaction Vary with Tourist Season? A Two-step Survey in a Mediterranean Destination, Tourism Management, 55 (Ağustos): 199–208.
  7. Croes, R., Ridderstaat, J. ve van Niekerk, M. (2018).
  8. Connecting Quality of Life, Tourism Specialization, and Economic Growth in Small Island Destinations: The Case of Malta, Tourism Management, 65 (Nisan): 212–223.
  9. Çeşme Kaymakamlığı (2016). http://www.cesme.gov.tr/nufus-durumu, Erişim tarihi: 15 Mayıs 2016.
  10. Çeşme Kaymakamlığı (2017). http://www.cesme.gov.tr/ekonomik-durumu, Erişim tarihi: 15 Mayıs 2017.
  11. Gursoy, D. ve Rutherford, D. G. (2004). Host Attitudes Toward Tourism: An Improved Structural Model, Annals of Tourism Research, 31 (3): 495–516.
  12. Jurowski, C. ve Gursoy, D. (2004). Distance Effects on Residents’ Attitudes Toward Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 31 (2): 296–312.
  13. Kim, K., Uysal, M. ve Sirgy, M. J. (2013). How Does Tourism in a Community Impact the Quality of Life of Community Residents?, Tourism Management, 36 (Haziran): 527–540.
  14. Kozak, N., Kozak, A. M. ve Kozak, M. (2016). Genel Turizm (18. Baskı). Ankara:
  15. Detay Yayıncılık. Liang, Z. X. ve Hui, T. K. (2016). Residents’ Quality of Life and Attitudes Toward Tourism Development in China, Tourism Management, 57 (Aralık): 56–67.
  16. Madrigal, R. (1995). Residents’ Perceptions and the Role of Government, Annals of Tourism Research, 22 (1): 86–102.
  17. Massam, B. H. (2002). Quality of Life: Public Planning and Private Living, Progress in Planning, 58 (3): 141–227.
  18. Mathew, P. V. ve Sreejesh, S. (2017). Impact of Responsible Tou