Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1

Evaluation of 335 inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein technique: a retrospective study

CLASSIFICATION OF THE 355 OPERATED INGUINAL HERNIA AND THE POSTOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF THE LICHTENSTEIN METHOD

Tayfun Bilgiç(Acibadem Kadikoy Hospital)0000-0002-7564-3663
Pages
1317–1324
Publication Date
2019-04-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: this study shown that Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair is a safe and feasible surgery method in respect to 1.1% recurrence and 22.6% overall post-operative complication rate.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate of 335 inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein technique in elective inguinal hernia management.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materyal and Methods: Three hundred fifty-five patients who administered to the General Surgery Clinic between Jan 2004 and Jan 2006 underwent inguinal hernia repair with the “Lichtenstein-tension-free” surgery technique were retrospectively evaluated in respect to demographics, recurrence and postoperative complications.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: this study shown that Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair is a safe and feasible surgery method in respect to 1.1% recurrence and 22.6% overall post-operative complication rate.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İnguinal herni · Lichtenstein-tension-free tekniği · komplikasyon

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate of 335 inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein technique in elective inguinal hernia management. Materyal and Methods: Three hundred fifty-five patients who administered to the General Surgery Clinic between Jan 2004 and Jan 2006 underwent inguinal hernia repair with the “Lichtenstein-tension-free” surgery technique were retrospectively evaluated in respect to demographics, recurrence and postoperative complications. Follow-up data were obtained from hospital charts, recurrence and late complications were evaluated in telephone interview. Results: 313 patients out of 355 were (88.2%) men and 42 (11.8%) were women. The mean age was 54 years (ranged 21-76 years). The hernia was on the right side in 241 patients (67.9%) and on the left side in 91patients (25.6%). 194 of 355 (54.7%) patients have indirect hernia. The postoperative mean hospital stay was 1.1 days (range 1-3 days). The most common postoperative early complication was urinary retantion. The late period complications including chronic pain in 3 patients (0.8 %), testicular atrophy in 2 patients (0.5 %), and recurrence in 4 patients (1.1%). Conclusion: this study shown that Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair is a safe and feasible surgery method in respect to 1.1% recurrence and 22.6% overall post-operative complication rate.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı kliniğimizde inguinal herni nedeniyle opere edilen hastaların analizini yapmak ve hastanın hastanede kalış süresini, post operatif rahatsızlığını, iyileşme süresini ve “Lichtenstein-tension-free” gerilimsiz greft ile herni tamiri operasyon yönteminin erken ve geç komplikasyonlarını tespit etmektir. Yöntem: Genel Cerrahi Kliniği’ne son 24 ay içerisinde başvuran ve inguinal herni tanısı ile “Lichtenstein-tension-free” ameliyat yöntemi ile opere edilen 355 hasta çalışmaya dahil edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan hastalardaki ameliyat eksplorasyon bulgusu değerlendirildiğinde 194 (%54.7) hastada indirekt, 102 (%28.8) hastada direkt, 24 (%6.7) hastada pantolon ve 35 (%9.8) hastada femoral herni olduğu saptandı. Postoperatif takip edilen hastalarda görülen erken komplikasyonlardan en sık spinal anesteziye bağlı gelişen idrar retansiyonu ( 25 hasta, %7) gözlendi. Çalışmaya dahil edilen hastaların geç dönem komplikasyonları sorgulandığında; 3 hastada nöralji ( %0.8) , 2 hastada ( %0.5) testiküler atrofi, 1 hastada ( %0.2) mesh reaksiyonu ve 4 hastada nüks (%1.1) saptandı. Sonuç: Lichtenstein yöntemi m odern ameliyat yönteminin gerektirdiği tüm istekleri karşılar ve neredeyse sıfıra yakın nüks oranı bulunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

Bilgiç, T. (2019). Evaluation of 335 inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein technique: a retrospective study. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1317–1324. https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.474539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional. Lancet 2003;362(9395):1561-71.
  2. Palermo M, Acquafresca PA, Bruno M, Tarsitano F. Hernioplasty with and without mesh: analysis of the immediate complications in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Arq Bras Cir Dig 2015;28(3):157-60.
  3. Amid PK, Lichtenstein IL. Current assessment of Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair. Chirurg 1997; 68(10):959-64.
  4. Pielaciński K, Wróblewski T, Wójtowicz J. Results of inguinal hernia repair by Lichtenstein method in material of Surgical Ward of the District Hospital in Żyrardow. Videosurgery Miniinv 2007;2(6):66–75.
  5. Liu Y, Shen Y, Chen J. Effects of non-woven mesh in preperitoneal tension-free inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study. Minerva Chir 2017;72(4):311-6.
  6. Reinpold W, Chen D. Evidence-based Lichtenstein technique. Chirurg 2017;88(4):296-302.
  7. Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, Montlor MM. The tension-free hernioplasty. Am J Surg 1989; 157(2):188-93.
  8. Rahul B.G, Ravindranath G.G. Incidence of inguinal hernia and its type in a study in a semiurban area in Andhra Pradesh, India. Int Surg J 2016;3(4):1946-9.
  9. Ruthlege RH, Cooper’s Ligament repair, a 25 year expriens with a single technique for all groin hernias in adults, Surgery 1988;103: 1-10.
  10. Arat IR, Fıtıklar, in: Değerli Ü (Ed) Genel Cerrahi. İst, Ed, İstanbul Tıp Fak, 461-88.
  11. S Aldoescu, T Patrascu, I Brezean. Predictors for length of hospital stay after inguinal hernia surgery. J Med Life 2015; 8(3): 350–5.
  12. Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, and et all. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients. Hernia. 2009; 13(4): 343–403.
  13. Prakash D, Heskin L, Doherty S, Galvin R. Local anaesthesia versus spinal anaesthesia in inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 2017;15(1):47-57.
  14. Narkhede R, Shah NM, Dalal PR, Mangukia C, Dholaria S. Postoperative Mesh Infection— Still a Concern in Laparoscopic Era. Indian J Surg 2015;77(4):322-6.
  15. Paton BL, Novitsky YW, Zerey M, Sing RF, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Management of infections of polytetrafluoroethylene-based mesh. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2007;8(3):337–41.
  16. Serbetci K, Kulacoglu H, Devay AO, Hasirci N. Effects of resterilization on mechanical properties of polypropylene meshes. Am J Surg 2007;194(3):375-9.
  17. Zhiyong Dong, Stacy Ann Kujawa, Cunchuan Wang, Hong Zhao. Does the use of hernia mesh in surgical inguinal hernia repairs cause male infertility? A systematic review and descriptive analysis. Reprod Health. 2018; 15: 69.
  18. Martin F Bjurstrom, Andrea L Nicol, Parviz K Amid, David C Chen. Pain control following inguinal herniorrhaphy: current perspectives. J Pain Res 2014;7: 277-90.
  19. Macrae WA, Davies HTO. Chronic postsurgical pain. In: Crombie IK, Croft PR, Linton SJ, LeResche L, Von Korff M, editors. Epidemiology of Pain. Seattle: IASP Press; 1999. pp. 125–142.
  20. Nordin P, van der Linden W. Volume of procedures and risk of recurrence after repair of groin hernia: national register study. BMJ 2008;336(7650):934–7.
  21. The HerniaSurge Group Hernia. International guidelines for groin hernia management 2018; 22(1): 1–165.
  22. Eklund AS, Montgomery AK, Rasmussen IC, Sandbue RP, Bergkvist LA, Rudberg CR. Low recurrence rate after laparoscopic (TEP) and open (Lichtenstein) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized, multicenter trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):33-8.