SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Practical evaluation of unplanned prosthetic dentistry clinic procedures beyond planned prosthetic dental treatments

Planlanmış protetik diş tedavisi uygulamalarının dışındaki planlanmamış protetik diş kliniği uygulamalarının pratikte değerlendirilmesi

Buse Çebi Gül(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2634-3565
Ersel Malkoç(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0005-5016-5596
Fikri Öcal(İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3734-4395
Pages
19–26
Publication Date
2026-04-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Effectively managing and recording unplanned interventions is critically important for increasing patient satisfaction, ensuring uninterrupted workflow, and strengthening coordination in multidisciplinary environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The research aims to identify common unplanned prosthetic dentistry clinic practices, assess their effects on clinical workflow and emphasize their importance in routine clinical procedures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Patients requiring unplanned prosthetic treatment who presented to the university prosthetic dentistry clinic for emergencies or walk-in appointments between October 2024 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Effectively managing and recording unplanned interventions is critically important for increasing patient satisfaction, ensuring uninterrupted workflow, and strengthening coordination in multidisciplinary environments.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2024 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kron sökümü · Protetik diş tedavisi · Protez tamiri

Abstract

Aim: The research aims to identify common unplanned prosthetic dentistry clinic practices, assess their effects on clinical workflow and emphasize their importance in routine clinical procedures. Materials and Methods: Patients requiring unplanned prosthetic treatment who presented to the university prosthetic dentistry clinic for emergencies or walk-in appointments between October 2024 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. All procedures were performed by specialist physicians, faculty members, and dentists specializing in prosthetics. Emergency procedures such as crown removal, impact removal, cementation, prosthesis repair, and provisional prosthesis fabrication were recorded. Results: A total of 534 patients were included in this three-month study (October-December 2024). Participants included 197 males and 337 females with a mean age of 61.4±6.23 years. Crown removal procedures were performed in 264 patients (49.4%). Post-delivery complications in removable, partial, or complete dentures included: prosthesis impaction in 85 patients (15.9%), cementation in 125 patients (23.4%), and prosthesis repair in 52 patients (9.7%). Conclusion: Effectively managing and recording unplanned interventions is critically important for increasing patient satisfaction, ensuring uninterrupted workflow, and strengthening coordination in multidisciplinary environments.

Özet

Amaç: Araştırma, yaygın planlanmamış protetik diş kliniği uygulamalarını tanımlamayı, bunların klinik iş akışı üzerindeki etkilerini değerlendirmeyi ve rutin klinik prosedürlerdeki önemlerini vurgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ekim 2024 ile Aralık 2024 arasında üniversite protetik diş kliniğine acil veya randevusuz olarak başvuran ve planlanmamış protetik tedavi gerektiren hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Tüm işlemler uzman hekim, öğretim üyeleri ve protez alanında uzmanlaşan diş hekimleri tarafından gerçekleştirildi. Kron sökümü, vuruk alımı, simantasyon, protez tamiri ve geçici protez yapımı gibi acil müdahaleler kaydedildi. Bulgular: Ekim-Aralık 2024 arasındaki üç aylık çalışmamıza toplam 534 hasta dahil edildi. Bu hastaların 197'si erkek, 337'si kadındı. Yaş ortalaması 61.4±6.23 yıl olarak bulundu. Hastaların 264'ünün (%49.4) kron sökümü için başvurduğu gözlendi. Hareketli, parsiyel veya tam protezlerin tesliminden sonra oluşan komplikasyonlar arasında 85 (%15.9) hasta protez vuruğu nedeniyle tedavi edildi. 125 (%23.4) hastaya simantasyon uygulandı. 52 (%9.7) hasta için protez tamiri gerçekleştirildi. Sonuç: Planlanmamış, randevusuz müdahalelerin kaydedilerek etkin bir şekilde yönetilmesi, hasta memnuniyetini artırmak, kesintisiz klinik iş akışını sağlamak ve multidisipliner ortamlarda koordinasyonu güçlendirmek için kritik öneme sahiptir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gül, B. Ç., Malkoç, E., Öcal, F. (2026). Practical evaluation of unplanned prosthetic dentistry clinic procedures beyond planned prosthetic dental treatments. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.30569/adiyamansaglik.1760189

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2003;90(1):31-41. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00214-2
  2. Datta A, Sandhu HS. Success of fixed partial denture prostheses observed in a military dental centre: A cross-sectional study. Medical journal, Armed Forces India. 2022;78(Suppl 1):S206-s212. doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.08.009
  3. Bağış B ÇBF, Ustaömer S, Özen B Sabit geçici restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006 3 42–49.
  4. Vasishta P, Sivaswamy V. Crown Removal Methods In Dentistry-A Literature Review. 2021;13(1).
  5. Jacobson TE, Krol AJ. A contemporary review of the factors involved in complete denture retention, stability, and support. Part I: retention. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1983;49(1):5-15. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(83)90228-7
  6. Evtimovska E, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time. Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. 2009;18(6):479-83. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00474.x
  7. Miettinen M, Millar BJ. A review of the success and failure characteristics of resin-bonded bridges. British dental journal. 2013;215(2):E3. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.686
  8. Sundh B, Odman P. A study of fixed prosthodontics performed at a university clinic 18 years after insertion. The International journal of prosthodontics. 1997;10(6):513-9.
  9. Phang ZY, Quek SHQ, Teoh KH, Tan KBC, Tan K. A. A retrospective study on the success, survival, and incidence of complications of post-retained restorations in premolars supporting fixed dental prostheses with a mean of 7 years in function. 2020;33(2):176-83.
  10. Hämmerle CH, Ungerer MC, Fantoni PC, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Lang NP. Long-term analysis of biologic and technical aspects of fixed partial dentures with cantilevers. 2000;13(5).
  11. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Ergin S, Erdogan O, Ates G. Evaluation of satisfaction and complications in patients with existing complete dentures. Journal of oral science. 2013;55(1):29-37. doi:10.2334/josnusd.55.29
  12. Brunello DL, Mandikos MN. Construction faults, age, gender, and relative medical health: factors associated with complaints in complete denture patients. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1998;79(5):545-54. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70176-3
  13. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. [Survey of treatment-seeking complete denture wearers concerning tooth loss, retention behavior and treatment expectations]. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia. 2006;116(3):229-36.
  14. Akın H, Özdemir AK. Protetik diş tedavisinde manyetik ataşmanlar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Derg. 2012; 6:99-109.
  15. Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1971;26(3):266-79. doi:10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2
  16. Carlsson GE. Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1998;79(1):17-23. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70188-x
  17. Behr M, Leibrock A, Stich W, Rammelsberg P, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Adhesive-fixed partial dentures in anterior and posterior areas. Results of an on-going prospective study begun in 1985. Clinical oral investigations. 1998;2(1):31-5. doi:10.1007/s007840050040
  18. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of resin bonded bridges and splints. British dental journal. 1993;174(11):405-11. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4808186
  19. Hargreaves AS. The prevalence of fractured dentures. A survey. British dental journal. 1969;126(10):451-5.
  20. Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A. Denture fracture--a survey. British dental journal. 1994;176(9):342-5. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4808449
  21. Jagger DC, Harrison A, Jandt KD. The reinforcement of dentures. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 1999;26(3):185-94. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00375.x
  22. Basker RM, Davenport JC, Thomason JM. Prosthetic treatment of the edentulous patient. John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
  23. Koruyucu M, Yaman D, Seymen F, Demirel K, Gençay K. Management of regional odontodysplasia: a 10-year-follow-up case report and literature review. European oral research. 2018;52(2):111-116. doi:10.26650/eor.2018.495
  24. Gracis S, Fradeani M, Celletti R, Bracchetti G. Biological integration of aesthetic restorations: factors influencing appearance and long-term success. Periodontology 2000. 2001;27:29-44. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.027001029.x
  25. Evtimovska E, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time. Journal of prosthodontics: official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. 2009;18(6):479-83. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00474.x