Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Finite element analysis of pre-stressed steel arch beams

Pages
95–107
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

With just three full-scale tests completed, it was evident that the ratio (35%) could be increased by adjusting the cable post-tension force on much smaller sized beams.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Techniques are being developed day-by-day to make it possible to pass through larger openings using smaller beam-column sections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to the effect of these, the arch beam load carrying capacity increases and a smaller sized optimized section can be obtained with a better architectural view.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:With just three full-scale tests completed, it was evident that the ratio (35%) could be increased by adjusting the cable post-tension force on much smaller sized beams.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Techniques are being developed day-by-day to make it possible to pass through larger openings using smaller beam-column sections. Parallel to this trend, there is another necessity to produce not only smaller but also more economical and archi-tecturally attractive beams. The aim of this study is to explain the structural behavior of steel arch beams reinforced using post-tension cables. Due to the effect of these, the arch beam load carrying capacity increases and a smaller sized optimized section can be obtained with a better architectural view. Moreover, it also allows better me-chanical and applicable solutions for buildings. For a better understanding of the be-havior of the reinforced beam, a steel beam and a steel arch beam with post-ten-sioned cables were modeled and analyzed using the SAP2000 finite element analysis computer program and compared with each other. In addition, full-scale specimens were prepared for testing to determine the structural behavior and compare the re-sults with those from the computer modeling, the outcome of which was very prom-ising. The similarity between the results inferred that no extra engineering knowledge and effort are needed to design such beams. The predicted (and proved by the testing) beam bearing capacity was 35% higher than that of the unreinforced beam. With just three full-scale tests completed, it was evident that the ratio (35%) could be increased by adjusting the cable post-tension force on much smaller sized beams.

🔖

Cite This Article

POLAT, E., ÇAĞLAYAN, B. Ö. (2018). Finite element analysis of pre-stressed steel arch beams. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 95–107. https://ajindex.com/articles/143874

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. ANSI-AISC 360 (2010). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, USA. Arda TS, Yardimci N (2000). Çelik Yapıda Öngerme. Birsen Yayınevi,
  2. İstanbul Turkey. Humar JL (1990). Dynamics of Sstructures. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. IMO - 02/2008 (2008). Çelik Yapılar Hesap Kuralları ve Proje Esasları. Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers (TMMOB/IMO), İstanbul,
  3. Tur-key. Wang ML, Chen ZL, Steve SK, George ML (2000). Magneto-elastic per-meability measurement for stress monitoring in steel tendons and cables. Proceedings of SPIE the International Society for Optical En-gineering, Vol. 3995, 492-500.
  4. Zhi F, Jian-qun W (2012). Practical formula for cable tension estimation by vibration method. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 17(1), 161-164.