Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Investigating the effect of infill walls on steel frame structures

Pages
27–32
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it is possible to observe cracks in the joints of infill walls and steel frame, the deformation properties of which differ, unless necessary precautions are taken.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Infill walls consisting of materials such as hollow concrete, hollow clay and auto-claved aerated concrete bricks are not only preferred in reinforced concrete build-ings but also in steel frame structures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the analyses done by using the equivalent diagonal strut model, it has been found out that infill walls limit the displacement of steel frames and increase the performance of a structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it is possible to observe cracks in the joints of infill walls and steel frame, the deformation properties of which differ, unless necessary precautions are taken.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Infill walls consisting of materials such as hollow concrete, hollow clay and auto-claved aerated concrete bricks are not only preferred in reinforced concrete build-ings but also in steel frame structures. It is a well-known fact that infill walls limit the displacement of frames under horizontal loads. However, they may also bring about certain problems due to being placed randomly in horizontal and discontinuously in vertical directions for some architectural reasons. Moreover, cracks in frame-wall joints are observed in steel frame structures in which ductile behaving steel and brit-tle behaving infill walls are used together. In this study, the effect of infill walls on steel frames has been investigated. In the steel frame structure chosen for the study, four different situations consisting of different combinations of infill walls have been modeled by using ETABS Software. Later, the pushover analyses have been per-formed for all the models and their results have been compared. As a result of the analyses done by using the equivalent diagonal strut model, it has been found out that infill walls limit the displacement of steel frames and increase the performance of a structure. However, it has been also determined that in the steel frame structure in which the infill walls have been placed discontinuously in vertical and asymmetri-cally in horizontal, infill walls may lead to torsional and soft story irregularities. As a result, it is possible to observe cracks in the joints of infill walls and steel frame, the deformation properties of which differ, unless necessary precautions are taken.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAK, O. F., YEDEK, S., ERDEM, M. M., BİKÇE, M. (2018). Investigating the effect of infill walls on steel frame structures. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 27–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/143872

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akkuzu AV (2007). Betonarme Çerçeveli Dolgu Duvarların Deprem Etkisi Altındaki Dinamik Davranışının İncelenmesi. M.Sc. Thesis, İstanbul Technical University, İstanbul,
  2. Turkey. Anıl Ö, Altın S (2007). An experimental study on reinforced concrete partially infilled frames. Engineering Structures, 29(3), 449-660.
  3. Beklen C, Çagatay İH (2009). Çerçevelerde dolgu duvar modellerinin incelenmesi. Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 24(1-2), 1019-1011.
  4. Beklen C (2009). Binalarda Dolgu Duvar Etkisinin İncelenmesi. M.Sc. Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey. DBYBHY (2007). Deprem bölgelerinde yapılacak binalar hakkında yönetmelik. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara,
  5. Turkey. Doğan O, Bakırcı Er Ş (2011). Hareketli yük ve dolgu duvar dağılımının burulma düzensizliğine etkisi. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 3(2), 2-5. ETABS User’s Manual. Integrated Building Design Software, Computer and Structure Inc. Berkeley, USA FEMA-356 (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC. Ghaffarzadeh H, Ghalghachi RN (2009). Redundancy in steel frames with masonry infill walls. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, 3(10), 415-421.
  6. İrtem E, Türker K, Hasgül U (2005). Dolgu duvarlarının betonarme bina davranışına etkisi. İTÜ Journal: D-Engineering, 4(4), 3-13.
  7. Kaltakcı MY, Köken A, Korkmaz HH, Kamanlı M (2006). Dolgu duvarlı çelik çerçevelerin tersinir-tekrarlanır yükleme altındaki davranışı üzerinde deneysel bir çalışma. Journal of the Engineering and Architecture Faculty of Selcuk University, 21(1-2), 34-48.
  8. Kaplan SA (2008). Dolgu duvarların betonarme taşıyıcı sistem performansına etkisi. Türkiye Mühendislik Haberleri, 6(452), 49-62.
  9. Kaymak F, Tuna E (2012). Bant pencereli ve tam dolgu duvarlı çelik çerçevelerin yanal monotonik yükleme etkisi altında lineer elastik hesabı. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 27(3), 547-556.
  10. Mehrabi AB, Shing PB, Schuller MP, Noland JL (1996). Experimental evaluation of masonry-infilled RC frames. Journal of Structural Engineering, 122(3), 228-237.
  11. Murty CVR, Jain SK (2000). Beneficial influence of masonry infill walls on seismic performance of RC frame buildings. Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 1-6.
  12. Öktem O (2003). Betonarme Çerçeve Sistemlerin Lineer Olmayan Hesabı ve Do