SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2015 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Elektronik Genel Kurul Toplantıları Türkiye’de Hissedar Haklarının Kullanımını Nasıl Etkiledi? : Türk Modeli’nin Uluslararası Standartlar ve Düzenlemeler Işığında Analizi

How Electronic General Meetings Affected Exercise of Shareholder Rights in Turkey: An Analysis of the Turkish Model in Light of International Market Standards and Regulations

Yakup ERGİNCAN
Bora KARAAĞAÇLI
Pages
95–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: corporate governance, electronic general meetings, central securities depositories, shareholder on of

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This paper discusses the impacts of the introduction of electronic general meetingsshareholder participation in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A long chain of intermediaries, national barriers and predominantly manual workflows adversely affect participation and representationshareholders in general meetings around the world.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: corporate governance, electronic general meetings, central securities depositories, shareholder on of
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This paper discusses the impacts of the introduction of electronic general meetingsshareholder participation in Turkey. A long chain of intermediaries, national barriers and predominantly manual workflows adversely affect participation and representationshareholders in general meetings around the world. International practices, standards and regulations together depict the features of a seamless and cost efficient model in general meeting processes. The study concludes that the new model, which was implemented by Merkezi Kayıt Kuruluşu A.Ş. (MKK), provides an ideal platform for the exercise of managerial rights in Turkey. Keywords: corporate governance, electronic general meetings, central securities depositories, shareholder on of

Özet

Bu çalışma, elektronik genel kurul sisteminin Türkiye’de uygulamaya alınmasının hissedar haklarının kullanımına olan etkilerini ele almaktadır. Uzun aracı zinciri, yerel mevzuata dair engeller ve ilgili iş akışlarında otomasyon eksiği gibi faktörler hissedarların genel kurul toplantılarına katılımını ve temsilini tüm dünyada olumsuz etkilemektedir. Uluslararası uygulamalar, standartlar ve düzenlemeler genel kurul toplantılarıyla ilgili süreçlerin etkin ve düşük maliyetli gerçekleştirilmesine yönelik bir modelin ana hatlarını çizmektedir. Çalışma, Türkiye’de Merkezi Kayıt Kuruluşu A.Ş. (MKK) tarafından geliştirilip uygulamaya sunulan elektronik genel kurul modelinin hissedarların yönetim haklarını kullanmalarında önemli yararlar sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERGİNCAN, Y., KARAAĞAÇLI, B. (2015). Elektronik Genel Kurul Toplantıları Türkiye’de Hissedar Haklarının Kullanımını Nasıl Etkiledi? : Türk Modeli’nin Uluslararası Standartlar ve Düzenlemeler Işığında Analizi. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 95–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/143780

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Alcock, R., Daly, A., Conde, C., and Robinson, A.A. (2006). Electronic Proxy Voting in Australia. Allens Arthur Robinson Publications. Ararat, M. and Eroğlu, M. (2002). “Istanbul Stock Exchange Moves First on Mandatory Electronic Meeting,” The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, 30 November 2012. Available [online] at: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/11/06/ istanbul-stock-exchange-moves-first-on-mandatory-electronic-voting/#comments CESAME, (2008). “Solving the Industry Giovannini Barriers to Post-trading within the EU,” 28 November 2008. Available [online] at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/financial-markets/docs/ cesame/cesame_report_en.pdf Ergincan, Y. (2011). “Mobile Corporate Governance: A Model Proposal for Modern Corporate Governance and Investor Relations,” Boğaziçi Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1: 171-200.
  2. Ergincan, Y. and Gürbüz, O. (2004), Corporate Governance: Status in Turkey and Suggestions for Improvement, 1st edition. Istanbul: Literatur Publishing Ergincan, Y. and Yayla, Ü. (2011). “General Meeting Attendance by Electronic Means in the New Turkish Commercial Code and Shareholder Representation,” Capital Markets Journal, OctoberDecember 2011, No. 8: 14-15. EU Directive (2007/36/EC) on the Exercise of Certain Rights of Shareholders in Listed Companies. Available [online] at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:184:0017:0024:EN:PDF ICGN, (2014). “Global Governance Principles EU Shareholders”. Available [online] at: http://www. fsa.go.jp/en/refer/councils/corporategovernance/reference/icgn.pdf. ISSA, (2013). “Global Principles for Corporate Actions and Proxy Voting: Progress Update Report”. Available [online] at: http://www.issanet.org/pdf/2013-09_CAWG_report.pdf ISSA, (2012). “Global Principles for Corporate Actions and Proxy Voting”. Available [online] at: http://www.issanet.org/pdf/ISSA_WG_CA-PV_Final_Report_June2012.pdf JWGGM, (2010). “Market Standards for General Meetings”. Available [online] at: http://www.ebffbe.eu/uploads/Market%20Standards%20for%20General%20Meetings.pdf
  3. Kelleher, E. (2012). “Turkey Moves First in e-voting,” Financial Times, 8 October 2012.
  4. Keser Berber, L. and Yayla, Ü. (2012). “Application of Electronic General Assembly in Turkey,” Regesta Corporate Law Journal, Istanbul Chamber of Commerce. Vol. 2, No. 3: 13-49.
  5. Kobler, G P. (1998). “Shareholder Voting Over the Internet: A Proposal For In