Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Intraday Return and Volatility Structures in Borsa Istanbul and the Impact of Opening and Closing Call Auction Sessions

Borsa İstanbul'da Güniçi Getiri ve Volatilite Yapısı ile Tek Fiyatlı Açılış ve Kapanış Seanslarının Etkisi

Pages
103–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Implementation of closing call session significantly decreased the average return in the closing time of the second session and the volatility in the opening time of the first session

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, intraday return and volatility structures are researched in Borsa Istanbul using 102 shares in different indexes while focusing on the period betwee n November 1, 2006 - May 31, 2012 by using 15-minute returns.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Additionally, the effect of opening and closing call sessions, implemented on February 2nd, 2007 and March 3rd, 2012 respectiv ely to reduce extraordinary price movement and ensure more effective price formation, on these structures are analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Implementation of closing call session significantly decreased the average return in the closing time of the second session and the volatility in the opening time of the first session
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, intraday return and volatility structures are researched in Borsa Istanbul using 102 shares in different indexes while focusing on the period betwee n November 1, 2006 - May 31, 2012 by using 15-minute returns. Additionally, the effect of opening and closing call sessions, implemented on February 2nd, 2007 and March 3rd, 2012 respectiv ely to reduce extraordinary price movement and ensure more effective price formation, on these structures are analyzed. For this purpose, the difference in the average and standard deviation of the 15-minute returns in the period before and after the implementation of call sessions are tested. Due to two separate trading sessions, the intraday return structure fits the double "U" form, the volatility structure fits the "L" form and both are consistent with the literature. Implementation of opening and closing call sessions significantly affected the structure of return and volatility at the opening time of the first session and closing time of the second session. Implementation of opening call session significantly decreased average return meanwhile increased volatility during the opening time of the first session. Implementation of closing call session significantly decreased the average return in the closing time of the second session and the volatility in the opening time of the first session

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 01.11.2006-31.05.2012 döneminde farklı endekslerde yer alan 102 adet hisse senedinin 624 güne ait 15 dakikalık getirileri analiz edilerek Borsa İstanbul'da gün içi getiri ve volatilite yapısı araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca seans açılış ve kapanışlarında görülen olağanüstü fiyat hareketlerinin azaltılması ve daha etkin fiyat oluşumunun sağlanması amacıyla 02.02.2007 ve 02.03.2012 tarihlerinde sırasıyla yürürlüğe giren tek fiyatlı açılış ve kapanış seanslarının bu yapılara etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Bu amaçla uygulama öncesi ve sonrası 15 dakikalık getirilere ait ortalama ve standart sapmanın farklı olup olmadıkları test edilmiştir. Borsa İstanbul'un gün içi getiri yapısının genel literatüre paralel olarak çift seans uygulaması nedeniyle çift "U" formunda ve gün içi volatilite yapısının ise "L" formunda olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Tek fiyatlı açılış ve kapanış seansları gün içi getiri yapısını birinci seans açılışında ve ikinci seans kapanışında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde etkilemiştir. Tek fiyatlı açılış seansıyla birlikte birinci seans açılışındaki ortalama getiride anlamlı bir düşüş ve volatilitede anlamlı bir artış olmuştur. Tek fiyatlı kapanış seansı uygulaması ise ikinci seans kapanışındaki ortalama getiride ve birinci seans açılışındaki volatilitede anlamlı bir düşüşe neden olmuştur

🔖

Cite This Article

KADIOĞLU, E., KÜÇÜKKOCAOĞLU, G. (2015). Intraday Return and Volatility Structures in Borsa Istanbul and the Impact of Opening and Closing Call Auction Sessions. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 103–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/143698

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Admati, A. ve Pfeiderer, P. 1988. A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability. The Review of Financial Studies.1:3-40.
  2. Amihud, Y. ve Mendelson, H. 1987. Trading mechanisms and stock returns: an empirical investigation. Journal of Finance. 42: 533-555.
  3. Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H. ve Murgia, M. 1990. Stock market microstructure and return volatility Evidence from Italy. Journal of Bankingand Finance.14:423-440.
  4. Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T. ve Cai, J. 2000. Intraday and interday volatility in the Japanese stock market. Journal of International Financial Markets.10:107-130.
  5. Bildik, R. 2001. Intra-day seasonalities on stockreturns: evidence from the Tur- kish stock market. Emerging Market Review.2:387-417.
  6. Chang, K.C., Fong, W., Kho, B. ve Stulz, R.M. 1996. Information, trading and- stock returns: Lessons from dually-listed securities. Journal of Banking and Finan- ce.20:1161-1187.
  7. Chan, K.C., W. G. Christie. ve P. H. Schultz. 1995. Market structure and the intraday pattern of bid-ask spreads for NASDAQ Securities. Journal of Business. 68(1):35-60.
  8. Cheung, Y. L. 1995. Intraday return and the day end effect: Evidence from the Hong Kong equity market. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. 22 (7): 1023-1034.
  9. Choe, H. ve Shin, H.1993. An analysis of interday and intraday return Volatility: evidence from the Korean Stock Exchange. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 175- 188. Comerton, F. C. 1999. Do trading rules impact on market efficiency? A com- parison of opening procedures on the Australian and Jakarta Stock Exchanges. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal. 7: 495-521.
  10. Copeland, L. ve Jones, S.A. 2000. Intradaily Patterns in Two Asian Index Futures Markets: Korea and Hong Kong. EFMA-2000'de sunulmuş olan tebliğ. Atina. Eaves, J. ve Wiliam, J. 2010. Are Intraday Volume And Volatility U-Shaped After Accounting For Public Information? Agricultural and Applied Economics. 92(1): 212-227.
  11. Ekman, P. D. 1990. Intraday and Weekly Patterns in the IMM Eurodollar Futu- res Market: Marketplace and Marketwlde Effects, Working Paper, Kansas State University. Ekman, P. D. 1992 Intraday Patterns in the S&P 500 Index Futures Market. The- Journal of Futures Markets.12:365-382.
  12. Ferguson, M., Mann, S. C, ve Schneck, L. 1993. Concentrated Trading in the Foreign Exchange Futures Markets: Discretionary Liquidity Trading or Market Closure?, Working Paper. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Foster, F.D. ve Viswanathan, S. 1993. Variations in trading volume, return vola- ti