SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Colloquium Anatolicum / 2017 / Sayı: 16

Philologische und geographische Bemerkungen zu den Toponymen der KULULU-Bleistreifen

Zsolt SIMON
Bekir ÖzerÖzlem Şimşek ÖZER
Pages
86–93
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The possible repercussions of these locations regarding the extension of the state of the Tabalite Great Kings and the dating of these lead strips are also discussed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Based on a philological analysis, this article provides a more precise form for some of the toponyms attested in the Hieroglyphic Luwian KULULU lead strips.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A location for five out of these previously unidentified toponyms is also suggested following a philological comparison of these toponyms with other Cappadocian toponym corpora.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The possible repercussions of these locations regarding the extension of the state of the Tabalite Great Kings and the dating of these lead strips are also discussed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hiyeroglif Luvicesi · Tabal · Geç Hititler

Abstract

Based on a philological analysis, this article provides a more precise form for some of the toponyms attested in the Hieroglyphic Luwian KULULU lead strips. A location for five out of these previously unidentified toponyms is also suggested following a philological comparison of these toponyms with other Cappadocian toponym corpora. The possible repercussions of these locations regarding the extension of the state of the Tabalite Great Kings and the dating of these lead strips are also discussed.

Özet

Filolojik bir analize dayanan bu makale, Hiyeroglif Luvice KULULU kurşun levhalarında geçen bazı yer isimleri için daha kesin bir tespit sunmaktadır. Kapadokya yer isimleriyle yapılan filolojik karşılaştırılmalar sonucunda, şimdiye kadar tanımlanamamış bu yer isimlerinin beş tanesi için yerleşim yerleri de önerilmektedir. Bu yerlerin olası tespitleri ışığında, Tabal Büyük Krallarının hüküm sürdüğü devlete ait coğrafi alanı ve kurşun levhaların tarihlendirilmeleri de ayrıca tartışılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

SIMON, Z., ÖZER, B. Ö. Ş. (2017). Philologische und geographische Bemerkungen zu den Toponymen der KULULU-Bleistreifen. Colloquium Anatolicum, Sayı: 16, 86–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/143691

References (10)

  1. ACLT Yakubovich, I.: Annotated Corpus of Luwian Texts. http://web-corpora.net/LuwianCorpus/ search/ (letzter Zugriff: 20.01.2017)
  2. Adiego, I. J. 2007
  3. The Carian Language, Leiden – Boston. Alkım, U. B. 1959 “Ein altes Wegenetz im südwestlichen Antitaurus-Gebiet”, Anadolu Araştırmaları / Jahrbuch für Kleinasiatische Forschung 1: 207-223.
  4. Aro, S. 1998 Tabal. Zur Geschichte und Kultur des zentralanatolischen Hochplateaus von 1200 bis 600 v. Chr., Universität Helsinki, Doktorarbeit, Helsinki. Barjamovic, G. 2011 A Historical Geography of Anatolia in the Old Assyrian Colony Period, Copenhagen. Barnett, R. D. 1975 “Phrygia and the Peoples of Anatolia in the Iron Age”, CAH3 II/2, Cambridge: 417-442. D’Alfonso, L. 2012 “Tabal. An Out-Group Definition in the First Millennium BC.”, G. B. Lanfranchi – D. Morandi Bonacossi – C. Pappi – S. Ponchia (Hgg.), Leggo! Studies Presented to Frederick Mario Fales on the Occasion of His 65th Birthday, Wiesbaden: 173-194. del Monte, G. F. 1992 Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der hethitischen Texte. Supplement, Wiesbaden. del Monte, G. – J. Tischler 1978 Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der hethitischen Texte, Wiesbaden. Dercksen, J. G. 2008 “Observations on land use and agriculture in Kaneš”, C. Michel (Hg.), Old Assyrian Studies in Memory of Paul Garelli, Leiden: 139-157.
  5. French, D. H. 1974 “A Study of Roman Roads in Anatolia: Principles and Methods”. Anatolian Studies 24: 143-149.
  6. Forlanini, M. 1988 “La regione del Tauro nei testi hittiti”, Vicino Oriente 7: 129-169.
  7. Forlanini, M. 1992 “Le spedizioni militari ittite verso Nerik: I percorsi orientali”, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo 125: 277-308.
  8. Forlanini, M. 2012 “The Historical Geography of Western Anatolia in the Late Bronze Age: still an open question”, Orientalia 81: 133-140.
  9. Forlanini, M. 2013 “La survie des toponymes de l’âge du bronze dans le Pont et en Cappadoce. Continuité ethnique, linguistique et survie des traditions de l’époque hittite impériale pendant les siècles “obscurs” jusqu’au début de l’âge classique?”, H. Bru – G. Labarre (Hgg.), L’Anatolie des peuples, des cités et des cultures (IIe millénaire av. J.-C. – Ve siècle ap. J.-C.). Colloque international de Besançon - 26–27 novembre 2010, Besançon: 69-84.
  10. Gander, M. 2010 Die geographischen Beziehungen der Lukka-Länder, Heidelberg. Gander, M. 2014 “Tlos, Oinoanda and the Hittite Invasion of the Lukka Lands. Some thoughts on the history of North-Western Lycia in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages”, Klio 96: 369-415. Giusfre