Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Urban transformation through property-led regeneration: A case of building renewals in Istanbul

Pages
183–196
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper covers a periodical evaluation of this process by attempting to understand the urban transformation pattern by means of a descriptive spatial analysis, and a discussion of recent policies in Bakirkoy case.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Urban transformation is a prominent topic within Istanbul’s urban planning agenda.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Transformation process of the city falls under the scope of academicians and the related authorities; and is a focus of debate from different perspectives in daily life.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper covers a periodical evaluation of this process by attempting to understand the urban transformation pattern by means of a descriptive spatial analysis, and a discussion of recent policies in Bakirkoy case.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Urban transformation is a prominent topic within Istanbul’s urban planning agenda. Transformation process of the city falls under the scope of academicians and the related authorities; and is a focus of debate from different perspectives in daily life. In this atmosphere, centralised policies promote construction facil- ities as the leading economic sector, and the legislation sets the legal framework facilitating transformation processes. This transformation in Istanbul occurs in two forms; as area-based regeneration projects and single building renewal pro- cesses. Area-based regeneration projects have long been examined due to their widespread effects, however single building renewal also leads to transformation over the long term. The motivation behind this paper is to examine the single building renewal process by means of a case study – Bakirkoy, which is one of the sub-centres of Istanbul. In this context, the paper aims to construct an analytical evaluation of the regeneration process in Bakirkoy and tries to evaluate the pro- cess linking it with critiques of property-led regeneration debates worldwide. This paper covers a periodical evaluation of this process by attempting to understand the urban transformation pattern by means of a descriptive spatial analysis, and a discussion of recent policies in Bakirkoy case.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORAMAZ, E. K., KORAMAZ, T. K., ÖZER, Ö. (2018). Urban transformation through property-led regeneration: A case of building renewals in Istanbul. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 183–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/143672

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Adair, A., Berry, J., McGreal, S., Ded- dis, B. & Hirst, S. (1999). Evaluation of Investor Behaviour in Urban Regeneration, Urban Studies, 36(12), 2031 – 2045. doi.org/10.1080/0042098992520 Alkay, E., Watkins, C., & Keskin, B., (2018). Explaining spatial variation in housing construction activity in Tur-key. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(2), 119- 130. Angell, E. (2014). Assembling disaster: Earthquakes and urban politics in Istanbul. City, 18(6), 667-678.
  2. Balaban, O., (2012). The negative effects of construction boom on urban planning and environment in Turkey: Unraveling the role of the public sector, Habitat International, 36(1), 26-35.
  3. Coskun, Y., Seven, U., Ertugrul, H.M., & Alp, A. (2017). Housing price dynamics and bubble risk: the case of Turkey. Housing Studies (2017: published online) 1-37. DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2017.1363378 Dincer I. (2011). The Impact of Neoliberal Policies on Historic Urban Space: Areas of Urban Renewal in Is- tanbul, International Planning Studies, 16(1), 43-60.
  4. Elicin, Y. (2014). Neoliberal trans- formation of the Turkish city through the Urban Transformation Act. Habitat International, 41, 150-155. Encyclopedia of Istanbul (Istanbul Ansiklopedisi). (1993) Bakirkoy Ilcesi (Bakirkoy District) Imrie, R. & Thomas, H. (1993). The limits of property-led regeneration, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 11, 87-102.
  5. Kayasü, S. & Yetişkul, E. (2014). Evolving Legal And Institutional Frameworks Of Neoliberal Urban Policies In Turkey, METU JFA, 31(2), 209 – 222. DOI: 10.4305/METU. JFA.2014.2.11 Kısar Koramaz, E. & Turkoglu, H., (2014). Istanbul’da Kentsel Yeşil Alan Kullanımı ve Kentsel Yeşil Alanlardan Memnuniyet [Urban Green Area Use and Green Area Satisfaction in Istan- bul], Planlama, 24(1), 26-34.
  6. Kısar Koramaz, E., (2014). The Spatial Context of Social Integration, Journal of Social Indicators Research, 119(1). 49-71. Kısar Koramaz E. & Koramaz T. K., (2017). İstanbul’da Kültür Tesislerinin Yer Seçimi, in Turk, S., S. & Dokmeci V. (Ed.), Yer seçimi Kuramı ve Uygulamaları: Konut, Alışveriş Merkezleri, Ofis- ler, Oteller, Sanayi, Depolar, Üniversiteler, Yurtlar, Hastaneler, Kültür Tesisleri, Yeşil Alanlar, Yeni Anadolu Yayıncılık, ISBN: 978-605-66154-5-0
  7. Koramaz, T. K. (2018). Housing Renewal Sites and Spatial Features of Deterioration and Deprivation in Istanbul’s Historic Peninsula. Jour- nal of Urban Planning and Develop- ment, 144(1). doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) UP.1943-5444.0000429 Kuyucu