Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

A comparative study of concrete strength prediction using artificial neural network, multigene programming and model tree

Pages
42–61
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study shows that these data driven techniques can be used for developing model/s to predict strength of concrete with an acceptable performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the current study 28 day strength of Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC) and Fly ash (class F) based concrete is predicted using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Mul-tigene Genetic Programming (MGGP) and Model Tree (MT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study shows that the predicted 28 day strength is in good agreement with the observed data and also generalize well to untrained data.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study shows that these data driven techniques can be used for developing model/s to predict strength of concrete with an acceptable performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In the current study 28 day strength of Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC) and Fly ash (class F) based concrete is predicted using Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Mul-tigene Genetic Programming (MGGP) and Model Tree (MT). Four sets of models were designed for per cubic proportions of materials, Properties of materials and non-di-mensional parameters as input parameters. The study shows that the predicted 28 day strength is in good agreement with the observed data and also generalize well to untrained data. ANN outperforms MGGP and MT in terms of model performance. Out-put of the developed models can be presented in terms of trained weights and biases in ANN, equations in MGGP and in the form of series of equations in MT. ANN, MGGP and MT can grasp the influence of input parameters which can be seen through Hinton diagrams in ANN, input frequency distribution in MGGP and coefficients of input pa-rameters in MT. The study shows that these data driven techniques can be used for developing model/s to predict strength of concrete with an acceptable performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

KULKARNI, P., LONDHE, S. N., DİXİT, P. R. (2019). A comparative study of concrete strength prediction using artificial neural network, multigene programming and model tree. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 42–61. https://ajindex.com/articles/143294

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Adnan SH, Rahman I.A, Saman HM (2011). Recycled aggregate as coarse aggregate replacement in concrete mixes. ASEAN Australian Engineering Congress 2011,
  2. Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia, 2011.
  3. Adriana TAD, Monica BL, Koji de JN (2013). Prediction of compressive strength of concrete containing construction and demolition waste using artificial neural networks. Construction and Building materi-als, 38, 717-722.
  4. Agarwal SD, Karnnkal AB, Patil PN (2011). Feasibility study of use of RCA in concrete. International Journal of Research in Engineering Sciences and Technology, SP-II, 70-75.
  5. Ahmet OZ, Murat PB, Erdogan O, Erdog K, Naci C, Bhatti A (2006). Pre-dicting the compressive strength and slump of high strength con-crete using neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 769–775.
  6. Bayazidi BM, Wang GG, Amir H, Alavi H, Gandomi AH (2014). Multigene genetic programming for estimation of elastic modulus of concrete. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1-10.
  7. ChakradharaRao M, Bhattacharyya SK, Barai SV (2010). Influence of field recycled coarse aggregate on properties of concrete, Materials and Structures, 44(1), 205-220.
  8. Corinaldesi V (2010). Mechanical and elastic behavior of concretes made of recycled-concrete coarse aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 1616–1620.
  9. Dapena E, Alaejos P, Lobet A, Pérez D (2011). Effect of recycled sand content on characteristics of mortars and concretes. Journal of Ma-terials in Civil Engineering, 23(4), 414-422.
  10. David RL, Gregory JJr (1999). Evaluating the use of “goodness of fit” measures in hydrological and hydro climatic model validation. Wa-ter Resources Research, 35(1), 233-241.
  11. Deepa C, SathiyaKumari K, Sudha KP (2010). Prediction of the com-pressive strength of high performance concrete mix using tree based modeling. International Journal of Computer Applications, 6(5), 18–24.
  12. Deshpande N (2016). Study of Properties of Concrete Made with Recy-cled Aggregate and Industrial Wastes with Special Application to Housing. Ph.D thesis, Shivaji University. Deshpande N, Londhe SN, Kulkarni SS (2014). Modeling compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete by Artificial Neural Net-work, Model Tree and Non-linear Regression. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 3, 187–198.
  13. Dias WPS, Pooliyadda SP. (2001). Neural networks for predicting prop-erties of concretes with admixtures. Construction and Building Ma-terials, 15, 371-379.
  14. Domingo-Cabo A, Lázaro C, López-Gayarre C, Serrano-López