Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Estimation of capacity of eccentrically loaded single angle struts with decision trees

Pages
1–8
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this application, use of dimensionless ratios as inputs for the development of DT was found to yield better results when compared to the approach of using the original variables as inputs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Single angle struts are used as compression members for many structures including roof trusses and transmission towers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The design standards provide guidelines that have been found inaccu-rate towards the conservative side.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this application, use of dimensionless ratios as inputs for the development of DT was found to yield better results when compared to the approach of using the original variables as inputs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Single angle struts are used as compression members for many structures including roof trusses and transmission towers. The exact analysis and design of such members is challenging due to various uncertainties such as the end fixity or eccentricity of the applied loads. The design standards provide guidelines that have been found inaccu-rate towards the conservative side. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have been ob-served to perform better than the design standards, when trained with experimental data and this has been reported literature. However, practical implementation of ANN poses problem as the trained network as well as the knowhow regarding the application should be accessible to practitioners. In another data-driven tool, the De-cision Trees (DT), the practical application is easier as decision based rules are gen-erated, which are readily comprehended and implemented by designers. Hence, in this paper, DT was explored for the evaluation of capacity of eccentrically loaded sin-gle angle struts and was found to be robust and yielded comparable accuracy as ANN, and better than design code (AISC). This has enormous potential for easy and straight-forward implementation by practicing engineers through the logic based decision rules, which would be easily programmable on computer. For this application, use of dimensionless ratios as inputs for the development of DT was found to yield better results when compared to the approach of using the original variables as inputs.

🔖

Cite This Article

DAUJİ, S. (2019). Estimation of capacity of eccentrically loaded single angle struts with decision trees. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/143290

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Adluri S, Madugula M (1996). Flexural buckling of steel angles: experimental investigation. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 122(3), 309-317.
  2. AISC (2000). Load and resistance factor design specification for singleangle members. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL. Ayaz Y, Kocamaz AF, Karakoc MB (2015). Modeling of compressive strength and UPV of high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete using rule-based M5 rule and tree model M5' classifiers. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 235–240.
  3. Barszcz AM (2014). Experimentally Assisted Modelling of the Behaviour of Steel Angle Brace, Archives of Civil Engineering, LX(1), 3–39.
  4. Bashar I, Amanat KM (2014). Numerical investigation of ultimate axial capacity of eccentrically loaded steel angles. Journal of Civil Engineering (IEB), 42(2), 217-232.
  5. Bathon L, Mueller W, Kempner L Jr. (1993). Ultimate load capacity of single steel angles. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119(1), 279-300.
  6. Behnood A, Olek J, Glinicki MA (2015). Predicting modulus elasticity of recycled aggregate concrete using M5' model tree algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 137–147.
  7. Bose NK, Liang P (1993). Neural Networks Fundamentals with Graphs, Algorithms, and Applications. Tata-McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Chapman & Hall/CRC, USA. Clark LA, Pregibon D (1991).
  8. Tree-based models, Statistical Models in S, Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (Eds.), Wadsworth. Pacific Grove, CA, 377–419.
  9. Dauji S (2016). Prediction of compressive strength of concrete with decision trees. International Journal of Concrete Technology, 2(1), 19– 29. Elgaaly M, Dagher H, Davids W (1991). Behaviour of single angle compression members. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 117(12), 3720-3741.
  10. Fisher JM (2000). Load and resistance factor design specification for single-angle members. American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago, IL. Garg NK, Deo MC, Kumar VS (2008). Short term prediction of coastal currents using Model Trees. Proceedings of the Indian National Conference on Advances in Hydraulic Engineering: Hydro 2008, India, 250-256.
  11. Gharaei-Manesh S, Fathzadeh A, Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R (2016). Comparison of artificial neural network and decision tree models in estimating spatial distribution of snow depth in a semi-arid region of Iran. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 122, 26–35.
  12. Ishida A (1968). Experimental study