SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2015 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

Türkiye’nin Nesilsel Hesapları

Generational Accounting in Turkey

Damla HACIİBRAHİMOĞLU
PINAR DERİN GÜRE
Pages
1–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Several hypothetical policy experi- ments have been implemented in the paper to correct the generational balance in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Generational Accounting, developed by Auerbach, Gokhale and Kotlikoff (1991), is an alternative and dynamic method employed in measuring the impact of existing fis- cal policies on current and future generations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Findings in the paper suggest that a 24.3% fiscal imbalance will be to the detriment of future generations in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Several hypothetical policy experi- ments have been implemented in the paper to correct the generational balance in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Generational Accounting, developed by Auerbach, Gokhale and Kotlikoff (1991), is an alternative and dynamic method employed in measuring the impact of existing fis- cal policies on current and future generations. In contrast to the traditional and static measures of fiscal sustainability, the Generational Accounting method reveals the intergenerational distribution of tax burden and helps identify the policies that can al- leviate the generational imbalance. This paper constructs and presents the first set of generational accounts for Turkey in an attempt to measure the generational gap and compare the Turkish intergenerational fiscal outlook with a number of developed and developing countries. Findings in the paper suggest that a 24.3% fiscal imbalance will be to the detriment of future generations in Turkey. Several hypothetical policy experi- ments have been implemented in the paper to correct the generational balance in Turkey.

Özet

Auerbach, Gokhale ve Kotlikoff (1991) tarafından geliştirilen Nesilsel Hesaplama, maliye politikalarının farklı nesillere olan etkisini ölçmek için kullanılan alternatif ve dinamik bir yöntemdir. Yöntem, bugünün ve gelecek nesillerin ödeyeceği net vergilerin şimdiki değerinin, devletin net değeriyle olan toplamının, devletin gelecekteki tüketimini karşılamaya yeterli olması gerektiği ilkesine dayanır. Geleneksel borç sürdürülebilirliği hesaplamalarının aksine Nesilsel Hesaplama, vergi yükünün nesiller arası dağılımını ortaya çıkarır ve nesilsel dengesizliğin giderilmesi için politika önerilerinde bulunur. Bu çalışma Türkiye için ilk nesilsel hesapları vermekte ve Türkiye’nin mali görünümünü gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkelerle karşılaştırmaktadır. Anahtar kelimeler: nesilsel hesaplama, mali sürdürülebilirli, Türkiye’nin Mali.Sistemi.

🔖

Cite This Article

HACIİBRAHİMOĞLU, D., GÜRE, P. D. (2015). Türkiye’nin Nesilsel Hesapları. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 1–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/143231

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ablett, J., Kotlikoff, L.J., and Leibfritz, W. (1999).”Generational Accounting in Australia.” NBER Working Papers #6688, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6688.
  2. Altamiranda, M.F., Kotlikoff, L.J., and Leibfritz, W. (1999). “Argentina’s Generational Accounts: Is the Convertibility Plan’s Fiscal Policy Sustainable?.” NBER Working Papers #7041, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7041.
  3. Auerbach, A.J., Gökhale, J., and Kotlikoff, L.J. (1991). ‘Generational Accounts: A Meaningful Alternative to Deficit Accounting.” NBER Working Papers #3589, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/3589.
  4. Auerbach A.J., Chun, Y.J., and Yoo, I. (2004). “The Fiscal Burden of Korean Unification: A Generational Accounting Approach.” NBER Working Papers #10693, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w10693.
  5. Auerbach, A., Kotlikoff, L.J., and Leibfritz, W. (1999). Generational Accounting around the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Auerbach, A.J., and Oreopoulos, P. (1999). “Generational Accounting and Immigration in the United States.” NBER Working Papers #7041, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7041.
  7. Aydede, Y. (2007). “Expected Social Security Wealth Simulations and Generational Fairness of the Turkish PAYG System.” Networks Financial Institute Working Paper, 2007-WP-21 Baker, B., Kotlikoff, L.J., and Leibfritz, W. (1999). “Generational Accounting in New Zealand.” NBER Working Papers #6697, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6697.
  8. Barro, R.J. (1987). “Government Spending, Interest Rates, Prices and Budget Deficits in the United Kingdom, 1701-1918,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 20(2): 221-247.
  9. Bohn, H. (1998). “The Behavior of U.S. Public Debt and Deficits,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3): 949-963.
  10. Bovenberg, L., Rele, H., and Leibfritz, W. (1999). “Generational Accounts for the Netherlands.” NBER Working Papers #6696, National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved January 17, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w6696.
  11. Cardarelli, R., Gobat, J., and Lee, J. (2000). Singapore: Selected Issues, IMF Staff Country Report No. 00/83, Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. Cardarelli, R. an