Journals / Alternatif Politika / 2019 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF SOVEREIGNTY AND RECOGNITION IN COUNTRIES FACING RECOGNITION PROBLEM

TANINMA SORUNU YAŞAYAN DEVLETLER AÇISINDAN EGEMENLİK VE TANINMA KONUSUNUN KAVRAMSAL ANALİZİ

Pages
1–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Taking the sovereignty issue of states facing with recognition, this article aims to discuss the problem of recognition of these states in the international system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, there are some states that are not legally recognized but actively involved in alternative political mappings.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Following the developments in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the issue of unrecognized states has attracted many scholars.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Taking the sovereignty issue of states facing with recognition, this article aims to discuss the problem of recognition of these states in the international system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In recent years, there are some states that are not legally recognized but actively involved in alternative political mappings. These states are seriously challenging the existing system because they maintain their presence in international platforms. Some of these political formations or entities have a certain level of international recognition, while some of which have not been recognized yet. Politicians in these political formations organize referendums within their geographical boundaries, declare their independence and even make foreign policy efforts. Following the developments in the late 1980s and early 1990s, the issue of unrecognized states has attracted many scholars. Many of those scholars continue to find new terms for these political formations, to discuss their place in the international system, or to put these formations in different categories in international law. However, these state-like entities or formations that do not conform to the classical framework appear to be a major problem in the international system. Taking the sovereignty issue of states facing with recognition, this article aims to discuss the problem of recognition of these states in the international system.

Özet

Son yıllarda, yasal olarak tanınmayan ancak fiili olarak alternatif siyasi haritalarda yerini alan bazı devletler mevcuttur. Uluslararası platformlarda varlıklarını sürdürdükleri için bu oluşumlar mevcut sisteme ciddi olarak meydan okumaktadırlar. Bu tarz siyasi oluşumların ya da varlıkların bazıları belirli bir uluslararası tanınma düzeyine sahipken bazıları hiç tanınmamıştır. Bu siyasi oluşumlarda faaliyet gösteren politikacılar kendi coğrafi sınırları içerisinde referandum düzenlemekte, bağımsızlıklarını ilan etmekte ve hatta dış politika yapma gayretindedirler. 1980’li yılların sonu ve 1990’lı yılların başındaki gelişmelerin ardından tanınmayan devletlerin konusu akademik çevrenin dikkatini çekmiştir. Birçok yazar, bu siyasi oluşumlar için yeni terimler bulmaya, uluslararası sistemdeki yerlerini tartışmaya veya bu oluşumları uluslararası hukukta farklı kategorilere koymaya devam etmektedirler. Bununla birlikte, klasik çerçeveye uymayan bu devlet benzeri varlıklar ya da oluşumlar, uluslararası sistemde büyük bir problem olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu makale, tanınma sorunu yaşayan devletlerin egemenlikleri konusunu ele alıp, bu devletlerin uluslararası sistemdeki egemenlikleri ve tanınma konusunu tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZÇELİK, A. O., PATARAYA, A. (2019). CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS OF SOVEREIGNTY AND RECOGNITION IN COUNTRIES FACING RECOGNITION PROBLEM. Alternatif Politika, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 1–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/142971

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bağcı, Hüseyin (2003), Uluslararası Hukuk (Ankara: Turhan Kitabevi). Bahceli, Tozun, Barry Bartman ve Henry Srebrnik (2004), De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty (London: Routledge). Berg, Eiki ve Raul Toomla (2009), “Forms of Normalization in the Quest for De Facto Statehood”, The International Spectator, 44 (4): 27-45.
  2. Biryukov, Pavel (2000), Mezhdunarodnoe Pravo (Moscow: Jurist). Blakkisrud, Helge ve Pal Kolsto (2012), “Dynamics of De Facto Statehood:The South Caucasian De Facto States Between Secession and Sovereignty”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 12 (2): 281-298.
  3. Brownlie, Ian (2003), Principles of Public International Law (New York: Oxford University Press). Caspersen, Nina (2008) “From Kosovo to Karabakh: International Responses to De Facto States”, Sudosteuropa, 56 (1): 58-83.
  4. Caspersen, Nina (2012), Unrecognized States (London: Polity). Caspersen, Nina (2013), Unrecongnized State:The Struggle for Sovereignty in the Modern International System (New Jersey: John Wiley ve Sons). Caspersen, Nina ve Gareth Stansfield (2011), Unrecognized States in the International System (London: Routledge). Cedeno, Victor R. (2003), Sixth Report On Unilateral Acts Of States (New York: United Nation). Crawford, James R. (2006), The Creation of States in the International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Crawford, James R. (2015), “Responsibility, Fraternity and Sustainability in International Law”, The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 52: 1-34.
  5. Çakmak, Cenap (2014),
  6. Uluslararası Hukuk, Giriş, Teori, Uygulama: Bir Uluslararası İlişkiler Yaklaşımı (Bursa: Ekin Yayıncılık). Florea, Adrian (2014), “De Facto States in International Politics (1945–2011): A New Data Set”, International Interactions, 40 (5): 788-811.
  7. Frear, Thomas (2014), “The Foreign Policy Options of a Small Unrecognised State: The Case of Abkhazia”, Caucasus Survey, 1 (2): 83-107.
  8. Geldenhuys, Deon (2009), Contested States in World Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan). Grant, John P. ve Craig J. Barker (2009), Encyclopedic Dictionary of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press). Harvey, James ve Gareth Stansfield (2011), “Theorizing the Unrecognized States:Sovereignty, Secessionism and Political Economy”, Caspersen, Nina ve Gareth Stansfield (Der.), Unrecognized States in the International System (London: Routledge): 11-26.
  9. Hille, Charlotte (2010), State Building and Conflict Resolution in the Caucasus (Leiden: Brill). Hills, Christopher (2003), The Challenging