SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 52

THE INFLUENCE OF U.S. MILITARY POLICIES ON THE SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND CAPTAIN HENRY METCALFE’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

ABD ASKERÎ POLİTİKALARININ BİLİMSEL YÖNETİM YAKLAŞIMINA ETKİSİ VE YÜZBAŞI HENRY METCALFE’NİN YÖNETİM BİLİMİNE KATKILARI

Fettah Kayra(SİİRT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6954-9910
Pages
449–476
Publication Date
2026-08-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this regard, the study seeks to provide a more comprehensive narrative of the development of scientific management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The emergence and development of the scientific management approach were significantly influenced by U.S. military production and by the officers and administrators involved in this field.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The primary contribution of this study is to highlight Metcalfe’s role in the history of scientific management and to incorporate an important yet overlooked figure into academic discussions on the evolution of management thought.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this regard, the study seeks to provide a more comprehensive narrative of the development of scientific management.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilimsel Yönetim · Yönetim Tarihi · Henry Metcalfe

Abstract

The emergence and development of the scientific management approach were significantly influenced by U.S. military production and by the officers and administrators involved in this field. Among these figures, Captain Henry Metcalfe stands out as one of the most important. This study focuses on the life and works of Captain Henry Metcalfe, whose contributions to the development of scientific management have received limited attention in the existing literature. The aim of this study is to examine the scientific management approach within its historical context by analyzing its relationship with developments in the U.S. Army and Metcalfe’s role in this process. The study adopts a qualitative research design and is conducted through a review of the relevant literature and various online sources. The primary contribution of this study is to highlight Metcalfe’s role in the history of scientific management and to incorporate an important yet overlooked figure into academic discussions on the evolution of management thought. In this regard, the study seeks to provide a more comprehensive narrative of the development of scientific management.

Özet

Bilimsel yönetim yaklaşımının ortaya çıkışı ve gelişiminde, ABD'nin askerî üretimi ve bu alanda çalışan subaylar ile yöneticilerin önemli bir rolü olmuştur. Bu isimlerden en önemli olanı Yüzbaşı Henry Metcalfe’dir. Bu çalışma, bilimsel yönetim yaklaşımının gelişimine katkı sunan ancak literatürde yeterince incelenmeyen Yüzbaşı Henry Metcalfe’nin hayatını ve çalışmalarını temel almaktadır. Çalışmanın amacı, bilimsel yönetim yaklaşımını tarihî bağlamda ele alarak, Amerikan ordusundaki gelişimiyle ilişkisini ve Metcalfe’nin bu süreçteki rolünü incelemektir. Çalışma, nitel araştırma yöntemine dayanmakta olup, literatür taraması ve çeşitli internet kaynaklarının incelenmesi yoluyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın temel katkısı, bilimsel yönetim tarihi içinde Metcalfe’nin rolünü vurgulayarak, yönetim düşüncesinin evri-minde göz ardı edilen önemli bir aktörü akademik tartışmaya dâhil etmektir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, bilimsel yönetimin gelişimine dair daha kapsayıcı bir anlatı sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayra, F. (2026). THE INFLUENCE OF U.S. MILITARY POLICIES ON THE SCIENTIFIC MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND CAPTAIN HENRY METCALFE’S CONTRIBUTIONS TO MANAGEMENT SCIENCE. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 52, 449–476. https://doi.org/10.18493/kmusekad.1665778

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (67)

  1. Aksay, B. ve Danışman, A. (2020). Taylor ve Bilimsel Yönetim Sistemi: Efsanevi Anlatılar ve ‘Bilim-sel’ Değerlendirmeler. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 1-33.
  2. Azad, R., Azad, R., Azad, K. ve Akbari, F. (2016). The Effect of Cost Accounting System Inventory on Increasing the Profitability of Products. Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information, 4(1), 83-87.
  3. Badem, A. C. (2016). The Origin of Term Budget for Business Enterprises: The Development of Busi-ness Budgeting from Beginning to the 1940s. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences Year, 2(24), 1-28.
  4. Battersby, T. (1878). The Perfect Double Entry Book-Keeper (Abridged) and the Perfect Prime Cost and Profit Demonstrator (on the departmental system) for Iron and Brass Founders, Machi-nists, Engineers, Shipbuilders, Manufacturers, etc. London.
  5. Beaver, D. R. (2004). The U.S. War Department in the Gaslight Era: Stephen Vincent Benét at the Ordnance Department, 1870-91. The Journal of Military History, 68(1), 105-132.
  6. Berle, A. A. ve Means, G. C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: The Macmillan Company.
  7. Biographs (2025). Henry Metcalfe. https://biographs.org/henry-metcalfe
  8. Burnham, J. (1941). The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World. New York: The John Day Company, Inc.
  9. Course Hero (2025). Contribution of Henry Metcalfe to Management While. https://www.coursehero.com/file/p2mm2gab/Contribution-of-Henry-Metcalfe-to-Management-While- Towne-was-developing-his/
  10. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1977). The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  11. Chen, R. S. ve Pan, S. D. (1980). Frederick Winslow Taylor's Contributions to Cost Accounting. Ac-counting Historians Journal, 7(2), 1-22.
  12. Dawson, A. (2006). A New Framework for Workshop Contracting: Philadelphia Machine Building, 1870–1914. Labor History, 47(3), 343-359.
  13. Drury, C. M. (2020). Management and Cost Accounting. Cengage.
  14. Famous Americans (2024). Henry Metcalfe. http://famousamericans.net/henrymetcalfe/
  15. Find a Grave (2024). Capt Henry “Harry” Metcalfe. https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/23867374/henry- metcalfe
  16. Foreman, P. (2001). The Transfer of Accounting Technology: A Study of the Commonwealth of Aust-ralia Government Factories, 1910-1916. Accounting History, 6(1), 31-59.
  17. Garner, S. P. (1954). Evolution of Cost Accounting to 1925. Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
  18. Guns International (2024). Model 1861 Springfield Percussion Rifle. https://www.gunsinternational.com/guns- for-sale-online/rifles/springfield-rifles---antique/model-1861-springfield-percussion-rifle---musket-dated- 1862-.cfm?gun_id=102620959#lg-1
  19. Hacker, B. C. (1993). Engineering a New Order: Military Institutions, Technical Education, and the Rise of the Industrial State. Technology and Culture, 34(1), 1-27.
  20. Harris, H. (2012). Coping with Competition: Cooperation and Collusion in the US Stove Industry, c. 1870–1930. Business History Review, 86(4), 657-692.
  21. Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M. ve Rajan, M. V. (2012). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Prentice Hall.
  22. Identify Medals (2025). The Order of Osmanieh. https://www.identifymedals.com/?s=order+of+osmanieh
  23. Jenks, L. H. (1960). Early Phases of the Management Movement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 421-447.
  24. Kayra, F. (2024). Taylor’dan Ötesi Bir Miras Olarak Bilimsel Yönetim Yaklaşımı: Derinlemesine Bir Bakış. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 73-109.
  25. Külli, B. (2019). Factory and Production Problems to Scientific Management Societies: Legitimacy of the Scientific Management Movement. Istanbul Management Journal, (87), 159-177.
  26. Külli, B. (2021). Discussions on the Nature of the Scientific Management Approach in the Early Times of U.S. Industry. Istanbul Management Journal, (90), 49-60.
  27. Landau, K. (2023). Psychotechnical Aspects in Engineering Disciplines. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswis-senschaft, 77(1), 23-38.
  28. Levenstein, M. (1998). Accounting for Growth: Information Systems and the Creation of the Large Corporation. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  29. Lewis, J. S. (1896). The Commercial Organisation of Factories. E. & FN Spon.
  30. Managers Help (2025). Taylors Scientific Management. http://www.managershelp.com/taylors-scientific- management2.htm
  31. Mass Live (2024). National Park Service Takes Note of Springfield’s Proud World War II Heritage (Editorial). https://www.masslive.com/opinion/2022/12/national-park-service-takes-note-of-springfields-proud- world-war-ii-heritage-editorial.html
  32. MDAH (2025). Individual Decorations and Citations-Series 2486. https://da.mdah.ms.gov/series/vab/s2486
  33. Metcalfe, H. (1885). The Cost of Manufactures and the Administration of Workshops: Public and Pri-vate. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Metcalfe, H. (1886). The Shop-order System of Accounts. Transactions of the ASME (American Soci-ety of Mechanical Engineers, 7(209), 440–488.
  35. Metcalfe, H. (1894). The Cost of Manufactures and the Administration of Workshops: Public and Pri-vate. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Montgomery, A. (2024). Research and Practice in Occupational and Organisational Psychology: Are We Learning from the Lessons of Our History?. History & Philosophy of Psychology, 24(1), 5-14.
  37. Myrick, D. (2012). Frederick Taylor as a Contributor to Public Administration. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(12), 10-20.
  38. Newton, I. (1687). Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica.
  39. Nişancı, Z. N. (2015). Geçmişten Günümüze Yönetim Düşüncesi. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(25), 257-294.
  40. Önday, Ö. (2016). Classical Organization Theory: From Generic Management of Socrates to Bureauc-racy of Weber. International Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(1), 87-105.
  41. Peoplepill (2025). American Business Theorist-Henry Metcalfe. https://peoplepill.com/i/captain-henry- metcalfe
  42. Petersen, P. B. (1989). The Pioneering Efforts of Major General William Crozier (1855-1942) in the Field of Management. Journal of Management, 15(3), 503-516.
  43. Petersen, P. B. (1991). The Evolution of the Gantt Chart and its Relevance Today. Journal of Manage-rial Issues, 3(2), 131-155.
  44. Raber, M. (2017). “It Would be Impossible to Estimate the Value of These Works.” Mass Production at Springfield Armory during the American Civil War. Arms & Armour, 14(1), 70-98.
  45. Romeo, G. C. ve Kyj, L. S. (2000). Anson O. Kittredge: Early Accounting Pioneer. The Accounting Historians Journal, 27(2), 117-143.
  46. Romeo, G. C. (2003). Notable 19th Century American Accountants that Could Be Considered for the Accounting Hall-of-Fame. Accounting Historians Notebook, 26(2), 1-9.
  47. Schachter, H. L. (1999). The Use of Market Metaphors in Public Participation Discourse. International Review of Public Administration, 4(2), 13-21.
  48. Schachter, H. L. (2016). Mary Parker Follett in Her Intellectual Environment. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 200–202.
  49. Shafritz, J. M., Ott, J. S. ve Jang, Y. S. (2015). Classics of Organization Theory. Boston: Cengage Learning.
  50. Sprague, L. G. (2007). Evolution of the Field of Operations Management. Journal of Operations Ma-nagement, 25(2007), 219-238.
  51. Stockton, D. A. (1970). Design of an In-Service Program for Assistant Principals of the English Scho-ols of the Montreal Catholic School Commission. (Doctoral dissertation). Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts.
  52. Taylor, F. W. (1895). A Piece-Rate System, Being a Step toward Partial Solution of the Labor Prob-lem. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 16, 856-883.
  53. Taylor, F.W. (1903). Shop Management. ASME Transactions, 24, 1337–1480.
  54. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York and London: Harper and Brothers.
  55. Towne, H. R. (1886). The Engineer as an Economist. Transactions of the American Society of Mecha-nical Engineers, 7, 428–432.
  56. Türk Dil Kurumu. (n.d.). Haddehane. Güncel Türkçe Sözlük içinde. https://sozluk.gov.tr
  57. Van De Water, T. J. (1997). Psychology's Entrepreneurs and the Marketing of Industrial Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 486-499.
  58. Wells, M. C. (1982). Taylor's Contribution to Cost Accounting: A Comment. The Accounting Histori-ans Journal, 9(2), 69-77.
  59. Witzel, M. (2012). A History of Management Thought. London and New York: Routledge.
  60. Wootton, C. W. ve Kemmerer, B. E. (2007). The Emergence of Mechanical Accounting in the U.S., 1880–1930. The Accounting Historians Journal, 34(1), 91-124.
  61. Wootton, C. W. ve Wolk, C. M. (2000). The Evolution and Acceptance of the Loose-Leaf Accounting System, 1885-1935. Technology and Culture, 41(1), 80-98.
  62. White, L. N. (2002). Does Counting Count: An Evaluation Study of the Use and Impact of Performan-ce Measurement in Florida Public Libraries. (Doctoral dissertation). The Florida State Univer-sity (School of Information Studies), Florida.
  63. White, L. N. (2008). Library Performance and Service Competition: Developing Strategic Responses. Oxford, England: Chandos Publishing.
  64. Whiting, R. J. (1963). John Richards—California Pioneer of Management Thought. California Mana-gement Review, 6(2), 35-38.
  65. Yates, J. (1990). Organizational Memory, 1850-1920. Business and Economic History, 19, 172-182.
  66. Yates, J. (1993). Control Through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. Bal-timore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  67. Raber, M. (2017). “It Would be Impossible to Estimate the Value of These Works.” Mass Production at Springfield Armory during the American Civil War. Arms & Armour, 14(1), 70-98.