Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

Enhancing decision making processes in early design stages: Opportunities of BIM to achieve energy efficient design solutions

Pages
53–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To achieve these aims, we have used quantitative (questionaire), qual- itative (pure observation, participant observation, in-depth interviews and focus groups) and protocol analysis (retrospective analysis) methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Over the last decades, technological advancements were carried out with a great pace and that forced industries to drastic changes and paradigm shifts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main reason of this situation is identified as many significant deci- sions which directly affect the performance of the building and the relationship of the building with natural and built environment are taken, even if there is no certain and valid information.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To achieve these aims, we have used quantitative (questionaire), qual- itative (pure observation, participant observation, in-depth interviews and focus groups) and protocol analysis (retrospective analysis) methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Over the last decades, technological advancements were carried out with a great pace and that forced industries to drastic changes and paradigm shifts. These ad- vancements provide new opportunities that arise with their new requirements. Due to some of these requirements, AEC industry unwittingly caused some cru- cial global issues which are gaining momentum exponentially, cannot be ignored anymore. The main reason of this situation is identified as many significant deci- sions which directly affect the performance of the building and the relationship of the building with natural and built environment are taken, even if there is no certain and valid information. The focus of the study is to discuss and evaluate the collected data and the obtained findings from previously implemented 5 case studies with 25 unique participants in a same context to re-evaluate and under- stand how BIM can help designers in the early stages of architectural design, most particularly in decision making processes. In addition, we also focus on inves- tigating what opportunities it provides, what drawbacks it causes and what the user feedbacks about using the tool in these stages are. The focus of this study is not to offer an alternative way for traditional design practices but to explore if these kinds of tools have advantages for conceptual designing and/or design supporting. To achieve these aims, we have used quantitative (questionaire), qual- itative (pure observation, participant observation, in-depth interviews and focus groups) and protocol analysis (retrospective analysis) methods.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Ö. H., ÇAĞDAŞ, G. (2018). Enhancing decision making processes in early design stages: Opportunities of BIM to achieve energy efficient design solutions. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 53–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/142547

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. AGC. (n.d.) The Contractors’ Guide to BIM. http://www.agc.org.
  2. Akin, O. (1979). Exploration of the design process. Design Methods and Theories, 13 (3/4), 115-119.
  3. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form (Vol. 5). Harvard University Press.
  4. Arora, H. (2009). Building decision support for dynamic decision making: A design science approach. Arizona State University. Attia, S., De Herde, A. (2011). Ear- ly design simulation tools for net zero energy buildings: a comparison of ten tools, In: Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Sim- ulation Association, Sydney, Australia, pp. 94–101
  5. Azhar, S. (2011). Building informa- tion modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC in- dustry. Leadership and management in engineering, 11(3), 241-252.
  6. Azhar, S., Brown, J., Farooqui, R. (2009). BIM-based sustainability anal- ysis: An evaluation of building perfor- mance analysis software. In Proceed- ings of the 45th ASC annual conference (Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 90-93). Architecture 2030. (n.d.) http://goo. gl/o4FC5X. Brehmer, B. (1992). Dynamic deci- sion making: Human control of com- plex systems. Acta psychologica, 81(3), 211-241.
  7. Buchanan, R. (2001). Design re- search and the new learning. Design issues, 17(4), 3-23. buildingSmart. (n.d.) www.build- ingsmart.com. Carmel‐Gilfilen, C., Portillo, M. (2010). Creating mature thinkers in in- terior design: Pathways of intellectual development. Journal of Interior de- sign, 35(3), 1-20.
  8. Casakin, H. (2008). Factors Of De- sign Problem-Solving And Their Con- tribution To Creativity. Open house international, 33(1). Çavuşoğlu Ö. H., Çağdaş, G. (2017). Why Do We Need Building Informa- tion Modeling (BIM) in Conceptual Design Phase?. Çağdaş, G., Özkar, M., Gül, L. F., & Gürer, E. (Eds.). Comput- er-Aided Architectural Design: Future Trajectories: 17th International Con- ference, CAAD Futures 2017,
  9. Istanbul, Turkey, July 10-14, 2017, 121-135.
  10. Çavuşoğlu, Ö. H. (2015a). Building Information Modeling Tools: Oppor- tunities for Early Stages of Architec- tural Design. CAADRIA 2015 - 20th International Conference on Com- puter-Aided Architectural Design Re- search in Asia: Emerging Experiences in the Past, Present and Future of Digi- tal Architecture, 427-436.
  11. Çavuşoğlu, Ö. H. (2015b). The Posi- tion of BIM Tools in Conceptual De- sign Phase: Parametric Design and En- ergy Modeling Capabilities. eCAADe 2015 Volume 1 Real Time, 607-612.
  12. Deutsch, R. (2011).