Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Review: In the complex epoch is sustainability “out” resilience “in”?

Pages
41–59
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It can be summarized that the paper fundamentally; 1. emphasizes the fact that sustainability has to be updated and upgraded considering uncertainty based challenges; 2. points out that the main argument between sustainability and resilience is the passage from stability to dynamism; 3. highlights the connection between resilience and sustainability through the relation between the principal attributes of two concepts; 4. underlines that resilience helps to rearrange the basic principles of sustainability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The scientific literature since 2000s shows that sustainability definitions have been evolving by fascinating new notions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main concern of sustainability which is to preserve resources from generation to generation is always an indis- pensable approach for systems stability, however it has to be questioned if sustain- ability can still maintain stability when there comes an unexpected condition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It can be summarized that the paper fundamentally; 1. emphasizes the fact that sustainability has to be updated and upgraded considering uncertainty based challenges; 2. points out that the main argument between sustainability and resilience is the passage from stability to dynamism; 3. highlights the connection between resilience and sustainability through the relation between the principal attributes of two concepts; 4. underlines that resilience helps to rearrange the basic principles of sustainability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The scientific literature since 2000s shows that sustainability definitions have been evolving by fascinating new notions. The main concern of sustainability which is to preserve resources from generation to generation is always an indis- pensable approach for systems stability, however it has to be questioned if sustain- ability can still maintain stability when there comes an unexpected condition. In this case, often, the concept is coupled with resilience. Resilience stresses a new way of thinking by providing the uncertainty and dynamism based perspective and guiding in terms of orientation in the face of uncertainties. Even if there is an increasing attention in literature to address the “sustainability-resilience relation”, there is not a clear unique scheme about how to bind two concepts. Based on this realization, this paper aims to address what has to be clarified to draw attention to the link between resilience and sustainability through in-depth literature review, focusing on the basic attributes of sustainability which have to be continuously updated in this complex unpredictable epoch and the basic attri- butes of resilience which provides this required upgrade. It can be summarized that the paper fundamentally; 1. emphasizes the fact that sustainability has to be updated and upgraded considering uncertainty based challenges; 2. points out that the main argument between sustainability and resilience is the passage from stability to dynamism; 3. highlights the connection between resilience and sustainability through the relation between the principal attributes of two concepts; 4. underlines that resilience helps to rearrange the basic principles of sustainability.

🔖

Cite This Article

GALANTINI, Z. D. Y., TEZER, A. (2018). Review: In the complex epoch is sustainability “out” resilience “in”?. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 41–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/142545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Abesamis, N.P, Corrigan, C., Drew, M., Campbell, S., Samonte, G. (2006). Social Resilience: A literature review on building resilience into human marine communities in and around MPA networks. MPA Networks Learning Partnership, Global Conservation Program, USAID, Retrieved from http:// www.reefresilience.org/pdf/Social_Resilience_Literature_Review.pdf. Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related. Progress in Human Geography, 24 (3), 347–364. doi: 10.1191/030913200701540465. Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Land- scape and Urban Planning, 100 (4), 341–343. doi: 10.1016/j.landurb- plan.2011.02.021. Alexander, D.E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 2707–2716. doi:10.5194/ nhess-13-2707-2013.
  2. Allen, J., Ervin, D. (2007). Introduction to Sustainability Concepts and Theories, Center for Sustainable Processes and Practices PSU Academic Sustainability Programs, Retrieved from https://docslide.us/ documents/introduction-to-sustain- ability-concepts-and-theories-jenni- fer-allen-and-david.html. Armitage, D.R., Johnson, D. (2006). Can resilience be reconciled with globalization and the increasingly complex conditions of resource degradation in Asian coastal regions?. Ecology and Society 11(1): 2. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol11/iss1/art2/ Autin, W. J., Holbrook, J.M. (2012). Is the Anthropocene an issue of stratig- raphy or pop culture?. GSA Today, 22 (7). doi: 10.1130/G153GW.1 Bagheri, A., Hjorth, P. (2007). Planning for Sustainable Development: a Paradigm Shift Towards a Process-Based Approach. Sustainable Development, 15, 83–96. doi: 10.1002/sd.310. Bastianoni, S., Pulselli, F.M., Tiezzi, E. (2004). The problem of assigning responsibility for greenhouse gas emis- sions, Ecological Economics Issue 3,1 49, 253–257.
  3. Berke, P.R., Conroy, M.M. (2000). Are We Planning for Sustainable De- velopment?. Journal of the American Planning Association, 66 (1), 21-33. doi: 10.1080/01944360008976081. Berkes, F. (2007). Understanding uncertainty and reducing vulnerability: lessons from resilience thinking, Natural Hazards 41, 283-295.
  4. Berkes, F., Colding, J., Folke, C, (2003), Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Birkmann, J., Seng, D.C., Abeling, T., Huq, N., Wolfertz,. J, Karanci, N., İkizer, G., Kuhlicke, C., P