SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatomy / 2019 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Improving the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations for undergraduate anatomy education

İlker SELÇUK
Mehmet ÜLKİR
Caner KÖSE
Burak ERSAK
Yağmur ZENGİN
İlkan TATAR
Deniz DEMİRYÜREK
Journal
Anatomy
Pages
200–204
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate if student number is a factor for the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate if student number is a factor for the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate if student number is a factor for the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate if student number is a factor for the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anatomy teaching · cadaveric dissection · undergraduate

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate if student number is a factor for the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations

🔖

Cite This Article

SELÇUK, İ., ÜLKİR, M., KÖSE, C., ERSAK, B., ZENGİN, Y., TATAR, İ., DEMİRYÜREK, D. (2019). Improving the efficacy of cadaveric demonstrations for undergraduate anatomy education. Anatomy, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 200–204. https://ajindex.com/articles/142438

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Selcuk I, Tatar I, Huri E. Cadaveric anatomy and dissection in surgical training. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;16(1):72-5
  2. Dissabandara LO, Nirthanan SN, Khoo TK, Tedman R. Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):205-12
  3. Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: A critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151-7
  4. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83-93
  5. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):15-22
  6. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(2):173-80
  7. Cottam WW. Adequacy of medical school gross anatomy education as perceived by certain postgraduate residency programs and anatomy course directors. Clin Anat. 1999;12(1):55-65
  8. Selcuk I. Barut C, Caliskan E. Impact of a gynecologic oncology cadaveric dissection course for surgical training. Anatomy. 2019;13(1):56-60
  9. Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J, Atkinson MA, Davies DC, Dyball R, et al. The Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine. J Anat. 2016;228(1):15-23
  10. Jeyakumar A, Dissanayake B, Dissabandara L. Dissection in the Modern Medical Curriculum: An Exploration into Student Perception and Adaptions for the Future. Anat Sci Educ. 2019
  11. Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, Cowie RJ, Ayeni SA, Dunn BK. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec. 2002;269(1):20-32
  12. Pais D, Casal D, Mascarenhas-Lemos L, Barata P, Moxham BJ, Goyri-O'Neill J. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(2):127-36
  13. Stringer MD, Nicholson HD. Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy: Modern models are already being applied. BMJ. 2008;337:a1966.