Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts

Pages
143–157
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper starts by outlining an overall methodology for Spatial Layout Evaluation based on occupant movements.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Comparing architectural designs as well as measuring their level of success is a challenging task.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Tracking of occupant movements provides objective data facilitating the development of new metrics for evaluating spatial layouts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This paper starts by outlining an overall methodology for Spatial Layout Evaluation based on occupant movements.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Comparing architectural designs as well as measuring their level of success is a challenging task. Tracking of occupant movements provides objective data facilitating the development of new metrics for evaluating spatial layouts. This paper starts by outlining an overall methodology for Spatial Layout Evaluation based on occupant movements. Then, a platform for acquisition and interpretation of objective data to better understand how space is utilized by occupants is introduced. This platform is the Trajectory Data Processing Framework (TDPF). It supports investigating correlations between occupant movements and problems associated with spatial layouts. Finally, as a proof-of-concept implementation of this framework, a set of tools for analysis of occupant interaction with layouts, called Occupant Layout Interaction Analysis (OLIA), is presented.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞARIR, L. L., İLAL, M. E. (2020). Occupant trajectory analysis for evaluating spatial layouts. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 143–157. https://ajindex.com/articles/141960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Al-Sayed, K. (2014) Space Syntax methodology. [Book]. A teaching guide for the MRes/MSc Space Syntax course (version 5). Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL: London, UK. Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6, 47–65.
  2. Brunetti A., Buongiorno D., Trotta G.F., Bevilacqua V. (2018). Computer vision and deep learning techniques for pedestrian detection and tracking: A survey. Neurocomputing, 300, 17-33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom. 2018.01.092. Conroy, R. D. (2001). The Secret is to Follow Your Nose. Proceedings- 3rd International Space Syntax Symposium, 1–14.
  3. Cross, N. (2001). Can a Machine Design ? Design Issues, MIT Press, 17(4), 44–50.
  4. Dawes, M., & Ostwald, M. J. (2013). Precise Locations in Space: An Alternative Approach to Space Syntax Analysis Using Intersection Points. Architecture Research, 3(1), 1–11. https:// doi.org/10.5923/j.arch.20130301.01 Dehghan A., Idrees H., Zamir A.R., and Shah M. (2014). Automatic Detection and Tracking of Pedestrians in Videos with Various Crowd Densities. In: Weidmann U., Kirsch U., Schreckenberg M. (eds) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012.
  5. Springer, Cham Golledge, R. G. (1992). Place Recognition and Wayfinding: Making Sense of Space. Geoforum, 23(2), 199–214.
  6. Hartkopf, V., & Loftness, V. (1999). Global relevance of total building performance. Automation in Construction, 8(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0926-5805(98)00085-5
  7. Hillier, B., Major, M., Desyllas, J., Karimi, K., Campos, B., & Stonor, T. (1996).
  8. Tate Gallery, Millbank: A study of the existing layout and new masterplan proposal. Retrieved from http:// eprints.ucl.ac.uk/932 Inglay, R. S., Park, O., & Andheri, E. (2010). Application of Systematic Layout Planning in Hypermarkets. Application of Systematic Layout Planning in Hypermarkets. Jo, J. H., & Gero, J. S. (1998). Space layout planning using an evolutionary approach. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 12, 149–162.
  9. Krosnick, J. a., & Presser, S. (2010). Question and Questionnaire Design. Handbook of Survey Research, 94305, 886. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1976. tb10115.x Labeodan, T., Zeiler, W., Boxem, G., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Occupancy measurement in commercial office buildings for demand-driven control applications - A survey and detection system evaluation. Energy and Buildings, 93, 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild. 2015.02.028 Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Bui