Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul

Pages
31–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, a field study was performed in Historical Peninsula, Tahtakale Region, and in-depth interviews and structured meetings were conducted with thirty-eight people to secure the contribution of different disciplines to the planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents a new planning approach within the context of the integration of archaeological and geological data in the planning process conducted in multi-layered cities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Even though the archaeological cultural heritage/inventory is more recognizable in the urban space, the construction of modern cities increases the developmental pressure on the underground cultural heritage/inventory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, a field study was performed in Historical Peninsula, Tahtakale Region, and in-depth interviews and structured meetings were conducted with thirty-eight people to secure the contribution of different disciplines to the planning.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

This study presents a new planning approach within the context of the integration of archaeological and geological data in the planning process conducted in multi-layered cities. The modern urban physical space in multi-layered cities requires greater integration of natural elements through the use of the new advanced technology. Even though the archaeological cultural heritage/inventory is more recognizable in the urban space, the construction of modern cities increases the developmental pressure on the underground cultural heritage/inventory. This study seeks an alternative method for transferring the archaeological and geological data for the Preservation-Oriented Zoning Practice Plan by using the Geographical Information Systems (GIS), in accordance with the decisions on registering the cultural assets in Turkey. With this approach, the aim is to change spatial planners’ perception of three-dimensional space and to propose a model for integrating archaeological data with the decisions based on the preservation plan. The effect of the elevation details of both the archaeological and geological data discussed on the integrated planning analysis and synthesis stage. The GIS were used for the spatialization of the archaeological data, while for the assessment and transfer of the obtained data by using ArcGIS software and “georeferencing” and “overlay analysis”. In addition, a field study was performed in Historical Peninsula, Tahtakale Region, and in-depth interviews and structured meetings were conducted with thirty-eight people to secure the contribution of different disciplines to the planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMRE, B., ERBAŞ, A. E. (2020). GIS-based approach to urban planning, archaeological inventory and geology structure in multilayered cities: The case of Tahtakale in Istanbul. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 31–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/141957

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ağır, A. (2009). İstanbul’un eski Venedik yerleşimi ve dönüşümü (Vol. 9). İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü. Altuğ, K. (2012). Planlama İlkeleri ve Yapım Teknikleri Açısından Tarihi Yarımada’daki Bizans Dönemi Sarnıçları. Restorasyon ve Konservasyon Çalışmaları Dergisi, (15), 3-22.
  2. Anichini, F., & Gattiglia, G. (2012). Urban Archaeological Information System. Considerations and critical aspects. Anichini F., Fabiani F., Gattiglia G., Gualandi ML, Mappa. Methodology Applied to Archaeological Potential Predicitivity, 1. Aysu, M. E. (1977). Eski kent mekanlarını düzenleme ilkeleri. İMMMA. Baratin, L., Bertozzi, S., & Moretti, E. (2013). GIS-Based Archaelogical Recording in Lebanon, 6th International Congress on “Science and Technology for the Safeguard of Cultural Heritage in the Mediterranean Basin”, pp. 187- 195, Athens, Greece Barvika, S., Bondars, E., & Bondare, S. (2018). Contemporary Challenges in Planning for Shrinkage of Historic Places: A Review. Architecture and Urban Planning, 14(1), 133-140.
  3. Bilgin, İ. (1996). Anadolu’da Modernleşme Sürecinde Konut ve Yerleşme. Tarihten Günümüze Anadolu’da Konut ve Yerleşme, 472-490.
  4. Binan, D. U. (2013). Türkiye’de Çok Katmanlı Yerleşimlerde Tanımlama- Koruma Yaklaşımı ve Öneriler: Bergama Örneği. Tasarım+ Kuram, 9(16), 1-26.
  5. Dinçer, İ. (2013). Kentleri dönüştürürken korumayı ve yenilemeyi birlikte düşünmek:“tarihi kentsel peyzaj” kavramının sunduğu olanaklar. Erbey, D. (2017). The challenges on spatial continuity of urban regeneration projects: the case of fener balat historical district in Istanbul. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 12(3), 498-507.
  6. Eyice, S. (1968). İstanbul maddesi. İslam Ansiklopedisi, 2. Feilden, B. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1998). Management guidelines for world cultural heritage sites. Goldberg, P., & Macphail, R. I. (2008). Practical and theoretical geoarchaeology. Oxford: Blackwell publishing. Saner, T., & Kızıltan, Z. (2011). İstanbul Arkeoloji Müzeleri arşiv belgeleri (1970-2010). 1. baskı. İstanbul. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, 9-40.
  7. Kuban, D. (1970). İstanbul’un tarihi yapısı. Mimarlık Dergisi, 5, 25-48. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, (2018). Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, 40. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı- 2018, cilt 1. sf 63, 80, 652, Yayın No: 183-1, Ankara 2019.
  8. Lefebvre, H. (2015).
  9. Şehir Hakkı, Sel Yayıncılık. Madanipour, A., & Hull, A. (2017). The Governance of Place: Space and planning processes. Routledge. Marull, J., Pino, J., Tello, E