SavedAdd your journal

Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2020 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of relationship between chronological age, dental age and skeletal age in children of Turkish population

Türk popülasyonundaki çocuklarda kronolojik yaş, dişsel yaş ve iskelet yaşı arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi

Derya İÇÖZ
Hilal ÖZBEY
Burak Kerem APAYDIN
Pages
123–128
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Although there is no statistically significant difference for males, it is possible to say that both the skeletal and dental maturation according to the used techniques are early in Turkish children.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between chronological age, skeletal and dental age obtained by using Fishman and Willems techniques in Turkish population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Hand-wrist radiographs and digital panoramic radiographs of 150 individuals (75 female and 75 male) aged 11-15.9 years were evaluated according to Fishman and Willems technique to determine skeletal and dental ages of individuals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Although there is no statistically significant difference for males, it is possible to say that both the skeletal and dental maturation according to the used techniques are early in Turkish children.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between chronological age, skeletal and dental age obtained by using Fishman and Willems techniques in Turkish population. Materials and Methods: Hand-wrist radiographs and digital panoramic radiographs of 150 individuals (75 female and 75 male) aged 11-15.9 years were evaluated according to Fishman and Willems technique to determine skeletal and dental ages of individuals. The relationship between the obtained data was statistically analyzed using paired sample t test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Both skeletal age and dental age were higher than chronological age in females and no statistically significant difference was seen in males. Skeletal and dental ages were found to be compatible for both males and females. Conclusion: Although there is no statistically significant difference for males, it is possible to say that both the skeletal and dental maturation according to the used techniques are early in Turkish children.

Özet

Amaç: Son yıllarda yaş tahmin yöntemleri, bireylerin kimliklerinin belirlenmesinin yanı sıra yasal sorumluluklar, doğum kayıtları, evlilik, iş başvuruları, cerrahi ve ortodontik tedavi planlamaları gibi birçok sebeple yaşayan bireyler için de yaygın kullanılır hale gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk popülasyonundaki çocuklarda Fishman ve Willems teknikleri kullanılarak elde edilen iskelet yaşı ve dental yaşın birbirleriyle ve kronolojik yaşla ilişkisini değerlendirmekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: Yaşları 11-15.9 arasında değişen 150 bireye ait (75 kız ve 75 erkek) el-bilek radyografları Fishman tekniğine göre ve dijital panoramik radyograflar ise Willems tekniğine göre değerlendirilerek bireylerin iskelet ve dental yaşları belirlendi. Elde edilen veriler arasındaki ilişki eşleştirilmiş örneklem t testi ve Wilcoxon işaret sıralı testi kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Kızlarda hem iskelet yaşı hem dental yaş kronolojik yaşa göre yüksek tahmin edilirken, erkeklerde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark gözlenmedi. Hem kız hem de erkeklerde iskelet yaşı dental yaşla uyumlu bulundu. Sonuç: Erkeklerde istatistiksel olarak fark anlamlı olmamakla birlikte Türk çocuklarında, kullanılan tekniklere göre hem iskeletsel hem de dental matürasyonun erken olduğunu söylemek mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

İÇÖZ, D., ÖZBEY, H., APAYDIN, B. K. (2020). Evaluation of relationship between chronological age, dental age and skeletal age in children of Turkish population. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 123–128. https://ajindex.com/articles/141949

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Palanisamy V, Rao A, Shenoy R, Baranya SS. Correlation of dental age, skeletal age and chronological age among children aged 9-14 years: A retrospective study. J Indian Soc J Pedod Prev Dent 2016; 34: 310-314
  2. Mohammed RB, Kalyan VS, Tircouveluri S, Vegesna GC, Chirla A, Varma DM. The reliability of Fishman method of skeletal maturation for age estimation in children of South Indian population. J Nat Sc Biol Med 2014; 5: 297-302
  3. Kumar V, Hedge SK, Bhat SS. The relationship between dental age, bone age and chronological age in children with sort stature. Int J Contemporary Dentistry 2011; 2: 6-11
  4. Macha M, Lamba B, Avula JSS, Muthineni S, Margana PGJS, Chitoori P, et al. Estimation of correlation between chronological age, skeletal age and dental age in children – A cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: 1-4
  5. Suma GN, Rao BB, Annigeri RG, Dayashankara Rao JK, Goel S. Radiographic correlation of dental and skeletal age: Third molar, an age indicatior. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011; 3: 14-18
  6. Green LJ. The interrelationships among height, weight and chronological, dental and skeletal ages. Angle Orthod 1961; 31: 189-193
  7. Varghese ST, Kumar V, Paul S, Jose LK, Mathew T, Siddique S. Estimation of dental and bone age in obese children of South India. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2018; 8: 153-159
  8. Mohammed RB, Reddy MAL, Jain M, Singh JR, Sanghvi P, Thetay AAR. Digital radiographic evaluation of hand-wrist bone maturation and prediction of age in South Indian adolescents. HAND 2014; 9: 375-383
  9. Patel PS, Chaudhary AR, Dudhia BB, Bhatia PV, Soni NC, Jani YV. Accuracy of two dental and one skeletal age estimation methods in 6-16 year old Gujarati children. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015; 7: 18-27
  10. Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod 1982; 52: 88-112
  11. Warhekar AM, Wanjari PV, Phulambrikar T. Correlation of radiographic and chronological age in human by using Demirjian’s method: A radiographic study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2011; 23: 1-4
  12. Balwant R, Anand SC. Tooth developments: An accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods. World J Med Sci 2006; 1: 130-132
  13. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973; 45: 211-227
  14. Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B, Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian childern: Demirjian’s technique revisited. J Forensic Sci 2001; 46: 893-895.