SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

The Comparison of Destination Marketing Organizations’ Social Media Performance

Destinasyon Pazarlama Organizasyonlarının Sosyal Medya Performansının Kıyaslanması

Doğuş KILIÇARSLAN
Tahir ALBAYRAK
Pages
149–160
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings indicate that London is more active at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram than other destinations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In contrast to the use of social media as an alternative marketing/promotion channel by Destination Marketing Organisations (DMOs), number of the studies about social media performance of destinations are limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, performances of the top 10 cities in Europe, according to visitor numbers, are compared at Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and Instagram.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings indicate that London is more active at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram than other destinations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In contrast to the use of social media as an alternative marketing/promotion channel by Destination Marketing Organisations (DMOs), number of the studies about social media performance of destinations are limited. In this study, performances of the top 10 cities in Europe, according to visitor numbers, are compared at Facebook, Youtube, Twitter, and Instagram. Findings indicate that London is more active at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram than other destinations. Istanbul and Antalya destinations which are visited by the greatest number of tourists in Turkey position at the latest ranks in these platforms. When compared to other platforms, Youtube is rarely used by DMOs. Moreover, there is a significant relationship between Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram performances and destination visitor numbers.

Özet

Sosyal medya, Destinasyon Pazarlama Organizasyonları (DPO) tarafından alternatif bir pazarlama/tanıtım kanalı olarak kullanılmasına karşın, destinasyonların sosyal medya performansını ele alan araştırmalar kısıtlı sayıdadır. Bu çalışmada, ziyaretçi sayısı açısından Avrupa’da ilk 10 sırada yer alan şehirlere ait DPO’ların Facebook, Youtube, Instagram ve Twitter performansı kıyaslanmıştır. Bulgular Avrupa’nın en çok ziyaret edilen 10 destinasyonu içerisinde Londra’nın Facebook, Twitter ve Instagram’da diğer destinasyonlara kıyasla daha aktif olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Türkiye’nin en fazla turist çeken destinasyonları olan İstanbul ve Antalya, bu üç platformda son sıralarda yer almaktadır. Diğer platformlara kıyasla Youtube’un DPO’lar tarafından çok fazla kullanılmadığı tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca Facebook, Twitter ve Instagram performansı ile destinasyonların ziyaretçi sayısı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇARSLAN, D., ALBAYRAK, T. (2020). The Comparison of Destination Marketing Organizations’ Social Media Performance. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 149–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/141788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aghaei, S., Nematbakhsh, M. A. ve Farsani, H. K. (2012). Evolution of the World Wide Web: From WEB 1.0 TO WEB 4.0, International Journal of Web & Semantic Technology, 3(1): 1- 10. Brown, R. (2018). The Impact of Social Media on Travel Inspiration, http://www.olapic.com/resources/the-impact-ofsocial-media-on-travel-inspiration_blog p1aw-f1tr-v1tht1sm/, Erişim tarihi: 3 Ağustos 2018.
  2. Buhalis, D. ve Law, R. (2008). Progress in Information Technology and Tourism Management: 20 Years on and 10 Years After the Internet the State of Etourism Research, Tourism Management, 29(4): 609–623. Dreamgrow.com İnternet Sitesinden Alınan Elektronik Referans. (2018). https://www.dreamgrow.com/top-15-mostpopular-social-networking-sites, Erişim tarihi: 25 Şubat 2018. Euromonitor.com internet sitesinden alınan elektronik referans. (2017). http://go.euromonitor.com/Top_100_City_ Destinations_WTM_Form_Download.html#download-link, Erişim tarihi: 11 Nisan 2018.
  3. Hays, S., Page, S. J. ve Buhalis, D. (2013). Social Media as a Destination Marketing Tool: Its Use by National Tourism Organisations, Current Issues in Tourism, 16(3): 211-239.
  4. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. ve Tseng, B. (2007). Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities, 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 Workshop On Web Mining And Social Network Analysis (ss. 56-65). ABD: San Jose, Kaliforniya. Johnson, B. (2011). Visit Britain to Cut Jobs and Refocus, https://www.marketingweek.com/2011/02/09/visitbritainto-cut-jobs-and-refocus, Erişim tarihi: 15 Ocak 2018.
  5. Kabadayi, S. ve Price, K. (2014). Consumer - Brand Engagement on Facebook: Liking and Commenting Behaviors, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 8 (3): 203-223.
  6. Kaplan, A. ve Haenlein, M. (2010).
  7. Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media, Business Horizons, 53(1): 59-68.
  8. Lu, Y., Chen, Z. ve Law, R. (2018). Mapping the Progress of Social Media Research in Hospitality and Tourism Management from 2004 to 2014, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 35(2): 102-118.
  9. Lund, N. F., Cohen, S. A. ve Scarles, C. (2018). The Power of Social Media Storytelling in Destination Branding, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 8: 271-280.
  10. Milwood, P., Marchiori, E. ve Zach, F. (2013). A Comparison of Social Media Adoption and Use in Different Countries: The Case of the United States and Switzerland, Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(1-2): 165-168.
  11. Munar, A. M. (2012). Social Media Strategies and Destination Ma