Journals / İslami İlimler Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 10

FÂRÂBÎ’DE YÜKLEMLİ KIYASLAR

Halil İmamoğlugil(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
149–163
Publication Date
2010-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Alfarab no ted that categorical syllogisms had to have same special conditions in terms of quality and quantity for giving conclusions of each figure of the categorical syllogisms, and exemplifid the moods giving conclusion in every figure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, we examined how Alfarab approached to the subject of cate gorical syllogism within scope of his works entitled “Kitāb al-Kıyās al-Sağīr” and “Kitāb al-Kıyās”.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Alfarab defined syllogism as Aristoteles did it, and after defining it, made analysing of that definition, and then explained each of the terms which composed the definition in that analysing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Alfarab no ted that categorical syllogisms had to have same special conditions in terms of quality and quantity for giving conclusions of each figure of the categorical syllogisms, and exemplifid the moods giving conclusion in every figure.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Inference · syllogism · categorical syllogism

Özet

In this article, we examined how Alfarab approached to the subject of cate gorical syllogism within scope of his works entitled “Kitāb al-Kıyās al-Sağīr” and “Kitāb al-Kıyās”. Alfarab defined syllogism as Aristoteles did it, and after defining it, made analysing of that definition, and then explained each of the terms which composed the definition in that analysing. Categorical syllo gisms were the main syllogisms that Alfarab emphasised. Before him, Aris toteles also took up those syllogisms. He examined it in the Organon and did not mention the syllogisms composed of conditional propositions. Alfarab no ted that categorical syllogisms had to have same special conditions in terms of quality and quantity for giving conclusions of each figure of the categorical syllogisms, and exemplifid the moods giving conclusion in every figure.

🔖

Cite This Article

İmamoğlugil, H. (2010). FÂRÂBÎ’DE YÜKLEMLİ KIYASLAR. İslami İlimler Dergisi, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 10, 149–163. https://ajindex.com/articles/1416684

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Ahderî, Abdurrahman, es-Süllem (el-Mantıku’l-Munazzam içinde), Mısır t.y.
  2. Ahmet Cevdet, Mi’yâr-ı Sedâd, İstanbul 1293.
  3. Akkanat, Hasın, “Dördüncü Şeklin Aidiyatı, Meşrûiyeti ve İslâm Mantık Düşüncesindeki Yeri”, Felsefe Dünyası, Sy. 49, Ankara 2009, ss. 250-274.
  4. Ali Sedat, Mîzânu’l-Ukûl fi’l-Mantık ve’l-Usûl, İstanbul 1303.
  5. Aristoteles, Organon III, Birinci Analitikler, Çev. H. Ragıp Atademir, İstanbul 1996.