Journals / Acta Medica Anatolia / 2016 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Quantitative Comparison of 2D and 3D MRI Techniques for the Evaluation of Chondromalacia Patellae in 3.0T MR Imaging of the Knee

Pages
118–123
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: FST2 sequence is equal or superior in detecting every grade of patellar chondromalacia in 3.0T MR imaging of the knee in comparison to FSPD, T2mD, WATSc, 3DT2FFE, and 3DmFFE images.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Chondromalacia patellae is a very common disorder of patellar cartilage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although many MRI sequences have been used in MR imaging of the patellar cartilage and the optimal pulse sequence is controversial, fat-saturated proton density images have been considered very valuable to evaluate patellar cartilage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: FST2 sequence is equal or superior in detecting every grade of patellar chondromalacia in 3.0T MR imaging of the knee in comparison to FSPD, T2mD, WATSc, 3DT2FFE, and 3DmFFE images.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Chondromalacia patellae is a very common disorder of patellar cartilage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a powerful non-invasive tool to investigate patellar cartilage lesions. Although many MRI sequences have been used in MR imaging of the patellar cartilage and the optimal pulse sequence is controversial, fat-saturated proton density images have been considered very valuable to evaluate patellar cartilage. The purpose of this study is to quantitatively compare the diagnostic performance of various widely used 2D and 3D MRI techniques for the evaluation of chondromalacia patellae in 3.0T MR imaging of the knee using T2 mapping images as the reference standard. Methods: Seventy-five knee MRI exams of 69 adult consecutive patients were included in the study. Fat-saturated T2-weighted (FST2), fat-saturated proton density (FSPD), water-only T2-weighted DIXON (T2mD), T2-weighted 3 dimensional steady state (3DT2FFE), merged multi-echo steady state (3DmFFE), and water selective T1-weighted fatsuppressed (WATSc) images were acquired. Quantitative comparison of grade 1 and grade 5 lesions were made using contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios. Grade 2-4 lesions were scored qualitatively and scorings of the lesions were compared statistically. Analysis of variance and Tukey's tests were used to compare CNR data. Two sample z-test was used to compare the ratio of MR exams positive for grade 1 lesions noted on T2-mapping and other conventional sequences. Paired samples t-test was used to compare two different pulse sequences. Results: In detecting grade 1 lesions, FSPD, FST2 and T2mD images were superior in comparison to other sequences. FSPD and FST2 images were statistically superior in detecting grade 2-4 lesions. Although all grade 5 lesions were noted in every single sequence, FST2 images have the highest mean CNR followed by 3DT2FFE images. Conclusion: FST2 sequence is equal or superior in detecting every grade of patellar chondromalacia in 3.0T MR imaging of the knee in comparison to FSPD, T2mD, WATSc, 3DT2FFE, and 3DmFFE images.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZGEN, A., FIRAT, Z. (2016). Quantitative Comparison of 2D and 3D MRI Techniques for the Evaluation of Chondromalacia Patellae in 3.0T MR Imaging of the Knee. Acta Medica Anatolia, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 118–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/141643

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Outerbridge RE. The etiology of chondromalacia patel- lae. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43(4):752-757. Pihlajamäki HK, Kuikka PI, Leppänen VV, Kiuru MJ, Mattila VM. Reliability of clinical findings and magnet- ic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of chondroma- lacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(4):927- 934. Gold GE, Chen CA, Koo S, Hargreaves BA, Bangerter NK. Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(3):628-638.
  2. Crema MD, Roemer FW, Marra MD, Burstein D, Gold GE, Eckstein F, et al. Articular cartilage in the knee: cur- rent MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. Radiographics 2011;31(1):37- 62. Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detec- tion of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormali- ties. Radiology 1996;198(1): 209-212.
  3. Duc SR, Koch P, Schmid MR, Horger W, Hodler J, Pfirrmann CWA. Diagnosis of articular cartilage le- sions of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence. Radiology 2007;243(2):475-482.
  4. Milewski MD, Smitaman E, Moukaddam H, Katz LD, Es- sig DA, Medvecky MJ, et al. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular carti- lage in the knee on a 3 T system scientific research. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(7):1637-1643.
  5. Kim HJ, Lee SH, Kang CH, Ryu JA, Shin MJ, Cho KJ, et al. Evaluation of the chondromalacia patella using a micros- copy coil: comparison of the two-dimensional fast spin echo techniques and the three-dimensional fast field echo techniques. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(1):78-88.
  6. Kijowski R, Blankenbaker DG, Munoz Del Rio A, Baer GS, Graf BK. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping se- quence to a routine MR imaging protocol. Radiology 2013;267(2):503-513.
  7. Dautry R, Bousson V, Manelfe J, Perozziello A, Boyer P, Loriaut P, Koch P, et al. Correlation of MRI T2 mapping sequence with knee pain location in young patients with normal standard MRI. JBR-BTR 2014;97(1):11-16.
  8. Xu J, Xie G, Di Y, Bai M, Zhao X. Value of T2-mapping and DWI in the diagnosis of early knee cartilage injury. J Radiol Case Rep. 2011;5(2):13-18.
  9. Noyes FR, Stabler CL. A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17(4):505-513.
  10. Brittberg M, Winalski CS. Evaluation of cartilage inju- ries and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A Sup