AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightTreatment response and overall survival of low grade and high grade patients, both according to Ann-Arbor and Lugano classification systems were similar.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal tract is the most common site of involvement in non-Hodgkin s lymphomas. Appropriate treatment regiments were not defined because of rare involvement. In the present study we aimed to evaluate treatment response of non-Hodgkin s lymphoma patients with stomach involvement. Methodology: 26 patients with stomach involvement were retrospectively analyzed between 01/01/1998 and 01/06/2014. Descriptive statistic was performed to analyze data. Methods: 20 of the patients (76.9%) were composed of primary stomach non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 of the patients (23.1%) were composed of patients secondary involvement of the advanced stage disease. All of the patients were subtypes of B cell lymphoma. 3 of the patients (11.5%) was indolent, 22 of the patients (84.6%) was aggressive, and 1 of them (3.8%) was very aggressive. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma was 72.9%; Maltoma was 8.7%, and Mantle cell lymphoma was %3.8. Complete response was achieved at 10 patients, partial response was achieved in 1 patient, and 7 patients were failed to response the treatment. Treatment response and overall survival of low grade and high grade patients, both according to Ann-Arbor and Lugano classification systems were similar. Patients with elevated sedimentation rate had significant lower survival than patients with normal sedimentation rate (p=0.027). Discussion: Together with the data from recent studies, aggressive treatment approach without organ preservation should not be performed on patients without higher inflammatory response and early stage presentation. Sedimentation rate might help to clinicians for the treatment of choice.