SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Effects to System Performance of Different PWM Techniques in Field Oriented Speed Control with back-to-back Converter of PMSG

Naim Suleyman TİNG
YAKUP ŞAHİN
Pages
34–44
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, it is observed that SVPWM can produce about 15 percent higher than SPWM in output voltage

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, the performance of space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) and hysteresis current control (HCC) techniques used in speed control with back to back converter of permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) used in wind turbines are comparatively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PMSG used in simulations is surface mounted, bipolar and its power is 1.8 kW.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, it is observed that SVPWM can produce about 15 percent higher than SPWM in output voltage
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

In this paper, the performance of space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM) and hysteresis current control (HCC) techniques used in speed control with back to back converter of permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) used in wind turbines are comparatively analyzed. The comparative analysis includes dynamic response, total harmonic distortion (THD), torque ripple and current ripple. Furthermore, SVPWM and SPWM are compared in terms of the using DC link voltage. Analysis of system is realized with MATLAB/Simulink program. PMSG used in simulations is surface mounted, bipolar and its power is 1.8 kW. Also, the energy of PMSG is transferred to grid with Field Oriented Control (FOC). According to analysis results, it has been observed that SVPWM generally has more effective results than both HCC and SPWM control techniques. Finally, it is observed that SVPWM can produce about 15 percent higher than SPWM in output voltage

🔖

Cite This Article

TİNG, N. S., ŞAHİN, Y. (2018). Effects to System Performance of Different PWM Techniques in Field Oriented Speed Control with back-to-back Converter of PMSG. ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 34–44. https://ajindex.com/articles/141611

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. A. Rolan, A. Luna, G. Vazquez, D. Aguliar, and G. Azevedo, “Modelling of a Variable Speed Wind Turbine with a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator,” IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics,Seoul, pp. 734-739, 2009
  2. C. Busca, A.I. Stan, T. Stanciu D.I. Stroe, “Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator for Large Wind Turbines,” Industrial Electronics Symposiom, Bari 2010, pp. 3871-3876
  3. M.M. Hussein, M. Orabi, M.E. Ahmed, M.A. Sayed, “Simple Sensorless Control Technique of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator Wind Turbine, International Conference on Power and Energy,” Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2010, pp. 512-517.
  4. K. Huang, S. Huang, F. She, B. Luo, L. Cai, “A Control Strategy for Direct-drive Permanent Magnet Wind Power Generator Using Back to Back PWM Converter,” ICEMS 2008
  5. Conference, Wuhan, pp. 2283-2288
  6. S. Yang, L. Zhang, “Modelling and Control of the PMSG Wind Generation System with A Novel Controller,” Third International Conference on Intelligent System Design and Engineering Applications, 2013, pp. 946-949
  7. J. Pradeep, R. Devanathan, “Comparative Analysis and Simulation of PWM and SVPWM Inverter Fed Permanent Magnet Synchronuos Motor,” ICETEEEM Conference, 2012, India. A. Cimpoer, “Encoderless Vector Control of PMSG for Wind Turbine Applications,” Master Thesis, Aalborg University Institute of Energy Technology, 2010,
  8. Denmark E. Hendawi, F. Khater, A. Shaltout, “Anlysis, Simulation and Implementation of Space Vector Pulse Width Modulation Inverter,” 9th WSEAS International Conference K.V. Kumar, P.A. Michael, J.P. John, S.S. Kumar, “Simulation and Comparison of SPWM and SVPWM Control for Three Phase Inverter,” ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, pp. 63-74, 2010
  9. A. Nachiappan, K. Sudararajan, V. Malarselvam, “Current Controlled Voltage Source Inverter Using Hystresis Controller and PI Controller,” EPSCICON Conference, 2012,
  10. Kerela E. İsen, A.F. Bakan, “Comparison of SVPWM and HCC Control Techniques in Grid Connected Three Phase Inverters,” ELECO 2010, 264-268
  11. R. Bhosale, J. Shaikh, R. Bindu, “Analysis of Inverter Modulation Strategies for Vector Controlled Drives,” International Journal of Advances in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, pp. 80-87
  12. B. K. Swamy, P. N. Rao, “Simulation of A Space Vector PWM Controller for A Three-Level Voltage-Fed Inverter Motor Drive,” International Journal of Advanced Trend in Computer Science and Engineering, 2013, pp. 363-372
  13. H. Shariatpanah, R. Fadaeinedjad, G. Moschopoulos, “