SavedAdd your journal

Journals / ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE / 2018 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

Solving Process Planning, WATC Scheduling and Due-date Assignment Problem Concurrently Using Genetic and Hybrid Search Algorithms for Weighted Customers

Halil İbrahim DEMİR
CANER ERDEN
ALPER GÖKSU
ÖZER UYGUN
Pages
87–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since these three functions affect each other and if we don’t integrate, then they will become poor input for downstream and overall performance will be poor.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traditionally process planning, scheduling, and due-date assignment functions are applied sequentially and separately.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since these three functions affect each other and if we don’t integrate, then they will become poor input for downstream and overall performance will be poor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At this study every customer has weight and they are scheduled by considering weights to improve performance value
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Traditionally process planning, scheduling, and due-date assignment functions are applied sequentially and separately. Since these three functions affect each other and if we don’t integrate, then they will become poor input for downstream and overall performance will be poor. In this competitive era, we must be competitive also. Integrating these functions will improve overall performance. In this study, we investigated the benefit of integration. We tested different integration level. First, we looked at unintegrated results and later step by step three functions are integrated and finally, we integrated these two functions with WATC (Weighted Apparent Tardiness Cost) Dispatching. In this study, we observed that as integration level increases the solution becomes better. Integrating due-date assignment or scheduling with process planning improves overall performance and if we integrate WATC dispatching with these two functions then we get the best performance. In addition to integration levels, we also compared the benefit of search techniques, especially genetic (directed) and hybrid (semi-directed) searches. At this study every customer has weight and they are scheduled by considering weights to improve performance value

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, H. İ., ERDEN, C., GÖKSU, A., UYGUN, Ö. (2018). Solving Process Planning, WATC Scheduling and Due-date Assignment Problem Concurrently Using Genetic and Hybrid Search Algorithms for Weighted Customers. ACADEMIC PLATFORM-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 87–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/141605

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. V. S. Gordon, J.-M. Proth, and C. Chu, “Due date assignment and scheduling: SLK, TWK and other due date assignment models,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 117–132, 2002.
  2. Y. Yin, M. Liu, T. C. E. Cheng, C. C. Wu, and S. R. Cheng, “Four single-machine scheduling problems involving due date determination decisions,” Information Sciences, vol. 251, pp. 164–181, 2013. H. I. Demir and H. Taşkın, “Integrated Process Planning, Scheduling and Due-Date Assignment,” Sakarya Üniversitesi,
  3. Sakarya, Turkey, 2005.
  4. H. I. Demir, T. Cakar, Ibrahim Cil, Dugenci, Muharrem, and Erden, Caner, “Integrating Process Planning, WMS Dispatching, and WPPW Weighted Due Date Assignment Using a Genetic Algorithm,” 3rd International Conference on Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering (ICCESEN 2016), vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 1258–1266, 2016. E. Ceven and H. H. I. Demir, “Benefits of Integrating Due-Date Assignment with Process Planning and Scheduling,” Master of Science Thesis, Sakarya University, 2007. W. Tan and B. Khoshnevis, “Integration of process planning and schedulin: a review,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 51–63, 2000
  5. X. Li, L. Gao, C. Zhang, and X. Shao, “A review on integrated process planning and scheduling,” International Journal of Manufacturing Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 161–180, 2010.
  6. R. Phanden, A. Jain, and R. Verma, “An approach for integration of process planning and scheduling,” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 284–302, 2013.
  7. Y. K. Kim, K. Park, and J. Ko, “A symbiotic evolutionary algorithm for the integration of process planning and job shop scheduling,” Computers & Operations Research, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1151–1171, 2003. N. Nasr and E. A. Elsayed, “Job shop scheduling with alternative machines,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1595–1609, 1990. J. M. Usher, “Evaluating the impact of alternative plans on manufacturing performance,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 585–596, 2003. J. Jiang and W. Hsiao, “Mathematical programming for the scheduling problem with alternate process plans in FMS,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 27, no. 1–4, pp. 15–18, Sep. 1994 N. Morad and A. Zalzala, “Genetic algorithms in integrated process planning and scheduling,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 169–179, 1999.
  8. C. Moon, J. Kim, and S. Hur, “Integrated process planning and scheduling wit