Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

Multiple roles and enhancements of makers in the post-industrial design practices: An inquiry for non-expertise in design

Pages
53–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the last section, makers’ shared aspects with the critical views in design, such as their strategies for gaining autonomy in their practices and creating personal meanings, are discussed to overcome the separation of design tasks and rationalization processes in industrial design.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present paper aims to reflect possible enhancements of makers in design practices through the shared aspects of criticisms in industrial design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present study method included a literature review on various critical aspects of industrial design to demonstrate the ones shared by the makers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the last section, makers’ shared aspects with the critical views in design, such as their strategies for gaining autonomy in their practices and creating personal meanings, are discussed to overcome the separation of design tasks and rationalization processes in industrial design.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The present paper aims to reflect possible enhancements of makers in design practices through the shared aspects of criticisms in industrial design. Such criticisms included industrialization’s effects on the rationalization of design processes, separation of design tasks, and separation of the industrial design profession from the artisans and craftspeople. Makers’ multiple roles in post-industrial production and their interpretations of industrial products provided the article for understanding their possible interventions in industrial design. The main research question of this article is as follows: What are the possible enhancements of makers that are useful to overcome the problems of industrialization in design? The present study method included a literature review on various critical aspects of industrial design to demonstrate the ones shared by the makers. Selected quotations from the semi-structured interviews conducted with nineteen maker participants accompany the literature review to introduce their varied skills that emerged in the collaborative practices and their perspectives of making for the generation of new meanings in design. In the last section, makers’ shared aspects with the critical views in design, such as their strategies for gaining autonomy in their practices and creating personal meanings, are discussed to overcome the separation of design tasks and rationalization processes in industrial design.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİLEK, Ö., PAZARBAŞI, Ç. K. (2020). Multiple roles and enhancements of makers in the post-industrial design practices: An inquiry for non-expertise in design. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 53–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/141598

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abel, B, V., Klaassen, R., Evers, L., & Troxler, P. (Eds.). (2011). Open Design Now: Why Design Cannot Remain Exclusive. Retrieved from http:// opendesignnow.org/index.html in September 2019.
  2. Akin, Ö. (1996). Frames of Reference in Architectural Design: Analysing the Hyperacclamation (A-h-a-!). Design Studies, 17(4), 341–361.
  3. Atkinson, P. (2010). Boundaries? What Boundaries? The Crisis of Design in a Post-Professional Era. The Design Journal, 13(2), 137–155. Doi: 10.27 52/175470710X12735884220817 Beegan, G. & Atkinson, P. (2008).
  4. Professionalism, Amateurism and the Boundaries of Design. Journal of Design History, 21(4), 305–313.
  5. Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published in 1976).
  6. Boeva, Yana. (2018).
  7. Break, Make, Retake: Interrogating the Social and Historical Dimensions of Making as a Design Practice (Doctoral dissertation). York University, Faculty of Graduate Studies, TORONTO. Bousbaci, R. (2008). Models of Man in Design Thinking: The Bounded Rationality Episode. Design Issues, 24(4), 38–52. Doi: 10.1162/desi.2008.24.4.38 Bredies, K. Joost, G. & Chow, R. (2009). Designers and Users: Comparing Constructivist Design Approaches. Proceedings of the 8th European Academy of Design Conference, Aberdeen, 71–75.
  8. Bunnell, K. (2004). Craft and Digital Technology [PDF file]. Retrieved from https://www.autonomatic.org.uk/ archive/team/kb/craft%20and%20digital% 20technology.pdf in September 2019.
  9. Cohen, D. (2009). Three Lectures On Post-Industrial Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: The MIT Press.
  10. Cross, N. (1981). The Coming of Post-industrial Design. Design Studies, 2(1). 3–7.
  11. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing [E-book Version]. Retrieved from https://www.springer.com/ gp/book/9781846283000#otherversion=9781846283017 in September 2019.
  12. Crouch, C. & Pearce, J. (2012). Doing Research in Design. Oxford: Berg. Dilnot, C. (2013). The Question of Agency in The Understanding of Design. Journal of Design History, 26(3), 331–337.
  13. Dorst, K. & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing Paradigms for Describing Design Activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261–274.
  14. Escobar, A. (2015). Transiciones: A Space for Research and Design for Transitions to The Pluriverse. Design Philosophy Papers. 13(1), 13–23. Doi: 10.1080/14487136.2015.1085690 Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
  15. Findeli, A. (2001). Reth