SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

The Impacts of Tourism Development on Residents’ Personal and Community Quality of Life

Turizm Gelişiminin Yerel Halkın Bireysel ve Toplumsal Yaşam Kalitesine Etkileri

PAŞA MUSTAFA ÖZYURT
MUSTAFA GÜLMEZ
Pages
52–62
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Furthermore, results indicate that tourism has significant effects on residents’ personal as well as community quality of life for both groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the relation of tourism and quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the study, which has been carried out in Alanya district of Antalya city, a total of 679 questionnaires collected of which 390 obtained from tourism dependents and 289 obtained from non-tourism dependents.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, results indicate that tourism has significant effects on residents’ personal as well as community quality of life for both groups.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the relation of tourism and quality of life. In this context, multidimensional relations among tourism impacts, residents’ personal and community quality of life and support towards tourism development have been investigated over two different groups based on economic dependence on tourism. For the study, which has been carried out in Alanya district of Antalya city, a total of 679 questionnaires collected of which 390 obtained from tourism dependents and 289 obtained from non-tourism dependents. While results of factor analyses indicate that both groups perceive tourism impacts in six dimensions, findings of the path analyses reveal two different tourism and quality of life models for tourism dependents and non-tourism dependents. Furthermore, results indicate that tourism has significant effects on residents’ personal as well as community quality of life for both groups.

Özet

Bu çalışma turizm ve yaşam kalitesi ilişkisini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Bu kapsamda turizmin etkileri, yerel halkın bireysel ve toplumsal yaşam kalitesi ve turizm gelişimine yönelik destek değişkenleri arasındaki çok boyutlu ilişkiler, turizme ekonomik bağımlılık düzeyine göre iki farklı grup üzerinden incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında Antalya’nın Alanya ilçesinde 390 adet gelirini turizmden kazananlardan, 289 adet ise turizmden gelir elde etmeyenlerden olmak üzere 679 anket toplanmıştır. Uygulanan faktör analizi bulguları her iki grubun da turizmin etkilerini altı boyutta algıladığını gösterirken, yol analizleri sonucunda elde edilen bulgular ise turizmden gelir elde edenler ile turizmden gelir elde etmeyenler için iki farklı turizm ve yaşam kalitesi modelinin ortaya çıktığını göstermiştir. Bununla beraber elde edilen bulgular her iki grup için de turizmin yerel halkın hem bireysel hem de toplumsal yaşam kalitesi üzerinde anlamlı etkilere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZYURT, P. M., GÜLMEZ, M. (2020). The Impacts of Tourism Development on Residents’ Personal and Community Quality of Life. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 52–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/141435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Andereck, K. L. ve Vogt, C. A. (2000). The Relationship Between Residents’ Attitudes Toward Tourism and Tourism Development Options, Journal of Travel Research, 39(1): 27-36.
  2. Avcı, N. (2018). Turizmin Yöre Halkının Yaşam Kalitesine Etkileri: Çeşme İlçesi Örneği, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 29(2): 164-174.
  3. Bognar, G. (2005).
  4. The Concept of Quality of Life, Social Theory and Practice, 31(4): 561-580.
  5. Chancellor, C., Yu, C. P. S. ve Cole, S. T. (2011). Exploring Quality of Life Perceptions in Rural Midwestern (USA) Communities: An Application of The Core–Periphery Concept in a Tourism Development Context, International Journal of Tourism Research, 13(5): 496-507.
  6. Cooper, C. ve Hall, M. (2013). Contemporary Tourism, an International Approach. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishing. Crouch, G. I. ve Ritchie, J. B. (2012). Destination Competitiveness and its Implications for Host-Community QOL. İçinde M. Uysal, R. Perdue ve M. Sirgy, (Editörler), Handbook of Tourism and Quality-of-Life Research, (ss. 491-513). Hollanda: Springer. Cummins, R. A. (1996). The Domains of Life Satisfaction: An Attempt to Order Chaos, Social Indicators Research, 38(3): 303-328.
  7. Cummins, R. A. (1997). Assessing Quality of Life. İçinde R. Brown, (Editör) Quality of Life for People With Disabilities, Modes, Researches and Practices, (ss.116-150). Londra: Nelson Thornes. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz L ve Diener, M. (1993). The Relationship Between Income and Subjective WellBeing: Relative or Absolute, Social Indicator Reserch, 28(3): 195-223.
  8. Diener, E. ve Seligman, M. E. (2004). Beyond Money Toward an Economy of Well-being, Psychological Science in The Public Interest, 5(1): 1-31.
  9. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. (1995). the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Position Paper From the World Health Organization, Social Science &Medicine, 41(10): 1403-1409.
  10. Galloway, S. (2006). Cultural Participation and Individual Quality of Life: A Review of Research Findings, Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(3): 323-342.
  11. Garcia, F. A., Vazquez, A. B. ve Macais, R. C. (2015). Resident’s Attitudes Towards the Impacts of Tourism, Tourism Management Perspectives, 13: 33-40.
  12. George, D. ve Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics 23 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. NewYork: Routledge. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. ve Anderson, R. E. (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Upper Saddle River: PrenticeHall. Haralambopoulos, N. ve Pizam, A. (1996).