SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Modern Education Studies / 2022 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

The Relationship Between Faculty Members’ Organizational Support Perceptions and Personal Growth Initiative Levels, The Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy

Başak Coşkun(NEVSEHIR HACI BEKTAS VELI UNIVERSITY)
Sevda Katıtaş
Halil Karadaş(MARDIN ARTUKLU UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0855-3702
Pages
—
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More research explaining the effect of organizational factors on self-efficacy and personal growth initiative is needed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between organizational support perceptions and personal growth initiative levels of the faculty members working in Turkey and to examine the effect of self-efficacy perceptions in this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was designed as a relational survey model. 346 faculty members from public universities in Turkey comprised the participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More research explaining the effect of organizational factors on self-efficacy and personal growth initiative is needed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Faculty members · Organizational support · Personal growth initiative

Abstract

The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between organizational support perceptions and personal growth initiative levels of the faculty members working in Turkey and to examine the effect of self-efficacy perceptions in this relationship. The study was designed as a relational survey model. 346 faculty members from public universities in Turkey comprised the participants. The data was collected with General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), Perceived Organizational Support Scale (POSS), Personal Growth Initiative Scale-II (PGIS-II). Descriptive analyses and structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to examine the structural relations among the variables. It was observed that faculty members’ organizational support perceptions had a significant direct effect on their personal growth initiative levels; organizational support perceptions had a significant effect on general self-efficacy beliefs; and the effect of general self-efficacy beliefs on personal growth initiative levels was significant. It was evidenced that faculty members’ self-efficacy beliefs fully mediated the relationship between perceived organizational support and personal growth initiative levels. These results are in line with the principles of Organizational Support Theory and Social Cognitive Theory. More research explaining the effect of organizational factors on self-efficacy and personal growth initiative is needed.

🔖

Cite This Article

Coşkun, B., Katıtaş, S., Karadaş, H. (2022). The Relationship Between Faculty Members’ Organizational Support Perceptions and Personal Growth Initiative Levels, The Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1413773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Abaci, R., & Okyay, B. (2013). A comparison of self confidence levels and personal growth initiative skills between managers and employees. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.006
  2. Ahmed, I., Nawaz, M. M., Ali, G., & Islam, T. (2015). Perceived organizational support and its outcomes: A meta-analysis of latest available literature. Management Research Review, 38(6), 627-639. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2013-0220
  3. Alola, U. V., Olugbade, O. A., Avci, T., & Öztüren, A. (2019). Customer incivility and employees' outcomes in the hotel: Testing the mediating role of emotional exhaustion. Tourism Management Perspectives, 29, 9-17.
  4. Aypay, A. (2010). Genel Öz Yeterlik Ölçeğinin (GÖYÖ) Türkçe'ye uyarlama çalışması [The adaptation study of General Self-Efficacy (GSE) Scale to Turkish]. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(2), 113-132.
  5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  6. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  8. Bandura, A. (2000). Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In W. Perrig and A. Grob (Eds.) Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer, (pp. 16-30), Taylor and Francis e-Library.
  9. Bandura, A. (2012). On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. Journal of Management, 38(1), 9-44. http://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410606
  10. Beri, N., & Jain, M. (2016). Personal growth initiative among undergraduate students: Influence of emotional self-efficacy and general well-being. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(2), 43-56. http://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v8n2.05
  11. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New York, NY, USA.
  12. Boz, M., Özkan, Ç., & Aydın, Ş. (2017). Algılanan örgütsel desteğin örgütsel bağlılığa etkisi: otelcilik sektöründe bir araştırma [The effect of perceived organizational support in organizational commitment: A research in the hospitality industry]. UİİİD-IJEAS, 2017 (16. UİK Special Issue): 71-86. https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.322256
  13. Büyükgöze, H. (2015). An investigation of pre-service science and mathematics teachers' personal growth ınitiative. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 8(3), 47-53.
  14. Caesens, G., & Stinglhamber, F. (2014). The relationship between perceived organizational support and work engagement: The role of self-efficacy and its outcomes. European Review of Applied Psychology, 64(5), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.08.002
  15. Chester, M. D., & Beaudin, B. Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 233-257.
  16. Claudia, M. (2018). The influence of perceived organizational support, job satisfaction and organizational commitment toward organizational citizenship behavior (a study of the permanent lecturers at University of Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin). Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (JIEB), 33(1), 23-45.
  17. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
  18. Çankaya, E. M., Dong, X., & Liew, J. (2017). An examination of the relationship between social self-efficacy and personal growth initiative in international context. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 61, 88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.10.001
  19. Çelik, E. (2015). Mediating and moderating role of academic self-efficacy in the relationship between student academic support and personal growth initiative. Australian Journal of Career Development, 24(2), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038416215583563
  20. Deniz Giray, M., & Sahin, D. N. (2012). Algilanan örgütsel, yönetici ve çalisma arkadaslari destegi ölçekleri: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalismasi [Perceived organizational, supervisor and coworker support scales: A study for validity and reliability]. Turkish Psychological Articles, 15(30), 1-9.
  21. Edwards, M. R., & Peccei, R. (2010). Perceived organizational support, organizational identification, and employee outcomes: testing a simultaneous multifoci model. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000007
  22. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42-51. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
  23. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Miller, P. A., Fultz, J., Shell, R., Mathy, R. M., & Reno, R. R. (1989). Relation of sympathy and personal distress to prosocial behavior: a multimethod study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(1), 55-66.
  24. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  25. Eisenberger, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organizational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.
  26. Fındıklı, M. A. (2014). Algılanan lider desteği ve algılanan örgütsel destek ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde örgütsel özdeşlemenin aracılık rolü: Istanbul’da kamu çalışanları üzerine bir araştırma [The mediating effect of organizational identification on the relationship among perceived leader support, organizational support and intention to leave: A survey for public employees in Istanbul]. Istanbul Management Journal, 25(77), 136-157.
  27. Geddes, D., & Stickney, L. T. (2011). The trouble with sanctions: Organizational responses to deviant anger displays at work. Human Relations, 64(2), 201-230. http://doi.org/10.1177/0018726710375482 Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 161-178.
  28. Hardin, E. E., Weigold, I. K., Robitschek, C., & Nixon, A. E. (2007). Self-discrepancy and distress: The role of personal growth initiative. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.86
  29. Hayton, J. C., Carnabuci, G., & Eisenberger, R. (2012). With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 235-249. http://doi.org/10.1002/job.755
  30. Henson, R. K. (2001). Relationships between Preservice Teachers' Self-Efficacy, Task Analysis, and Classroom Management Beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, February, 3, 2001, New Orleans.
  31. Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1989). Anxiety and self-concept as antecedents of stress and coping: A longitudinal study with German and Turkish adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 10(7), 785-792.
  32. Jex, S. M. (1998). Stress and job performance: Theory, research, and implications for managerial practice. Sage Publications Ltd.
  33. Joo, B. K. B., Park, S., & Lee, S. (2020). Personal growth initiative: the effects of person–organization fit, work empowerment and authentic leadership. International Journal of Manpower, 42(3), 502-517. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-02-2020-0056
  34. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied Psychology, 86(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.1.80
  35. Karasar, N. (2011). Bilimsel araştirma yöntemi [Scientific research methods], (11. edition) Ankara: Nobel Publishing House.
  36. Kalemci Tuzun, I., & Kalemci, R. A. (2012), Organizational and supervisory support in relation to employee turnover intentions, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(5), 518-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211235418
  37. Kashubeck-West, S., & Meyer, J. (2008). The well-being of women who are late deafened. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55(4), 463-472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013619
  38. Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1854-1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554
  39. Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R. F., & Smith, J. B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers' efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 190-208.
  40. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
  41. Loo, J. M., Tsai, J. S., Raylu, N., & Oei, T. P. (2014). Gratitude, hope, mindfulness and personal-growth initiative: Buffers or risk factors for problem gambling?. PloS one, 9(2), e83889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083889
  42. Lönnfjord, V., & Hagquist, C. (2018). The psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the general self-efficacy scale: A Rasch analysis based on adolescent data. Current Psychology, 37(4), 703-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9551-y
  43. Luyckx, K., & Robitschek, C. (2014). Personal growth initiative and identity formation in adolescence through young adulthood: Mediating processes on the pathway to well-being. Journal of Adolescence, 37(7), 973-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.07.009
  44. MacKinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-608. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085542
  45. Madan, P., & Srivastava, S. (2017). Does personal growth initiative lead to impression management: role of personality?. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 8(3), 234-248.
  46. Malik, N. I., Yasin, G., & Shahzadi, H. (2013). Personal growth initiative and self-esteem as predictors of academic achievement among students of technical training institutes. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 33(2), 435-446.
  47. Matsuo, M. (2019). Empowerment through self-improvement skills: The role of learning goals and personal growth initiative. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.05.008
  48. Michael, J. H., Evans, D. D., Jansen, K. J., & Haight, J. M. (2005). Management commitment to safety as organizational support: Relationships with non-safety outcomes in wood manufacturing employees. Journal of safety research, 36(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2005.03.002
  49. Moen, F., & Allgood, E. (2009). Coaching and the effect on self-efficacy. Organization Development Journal, 27(4), 69-82.
  50. Neff, K. D., Kirkpatrick, K. L., & Rude, S. S. (2007). Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.004
  51. Ogunyemi, A. O., & Mabekoje, S. O. (2007) Self-efficacy, risk-taking behavior and mental health as predictors of personal growth initiative among university undergraduates. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(2), 349-362.
  52. Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). Challenging the status quo: What motivates proactive behaviour?. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 623-629. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X180360
  53. Özdevecioğlu, M. (2004). Algılanan örgütsel desteğin işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkileri [A research for determining the effects of perceived organizational support on turnover intention]. Journal of Public Management, 37(4), 97-115.
  54. Summary of the Number of the Faculty Members in Turkey was reached on 08.07.2022 on https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/.
  55. Özyılmaz, A., Erdoğan, B., & Karaeminogullari, A. (2018). Trust in organization as a moderator of the relationship between self‐efficacy and workplace outcomes: A social cognitive theory‐ based examination. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91 (1), 181-204.
  56. Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of management, 36(3), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
  57. Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636-652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
  58. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 Prussia, G. E., Anderson, J. S., & Manz, C. C. (1998). Self‐leadership and performance outcomes: the mediating influence of self‐efficacy. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 19(5), 523-538.
  59. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698-714. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.698 Robitschek, C., Ashton, M. W., Spering, C. C., Geiger, N., Byers, D., Schotts, G. C., & Thoen, M. A. (2012). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 59(2), 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027310
  60. Robitschek, C. (1998). Personal growth initiative: The construct and its measure. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30(4), 183-198.
  61. Robitschek, C. (1999). Further Validation of the Personal Growth Initiative Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31(4), 197-210.
  62. Robitschek, C., & Keyes, C. L. (2009). Keyes's model of mental health with personal growth initiative as a parsimonious predictor. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(2), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013954
  63. Sanders, M. J., Van Oss, T., & McGeary, S. (2016). Analyzing reflections in service learning to promote personal growth and community self-efficacy. Journal of Experiential Education, 39(1), 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825915608872
  64. Song, J. H., Chai, D. S., Kim, J., & Bae, S. H. (2018). Job performance in the learning organization: The mediating impacts of self‐efficacy and work engagement. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 30(4), 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21251 Sharma, H. L., & Rani, R. (2014). Self-efficacy–a comparison among university postgraduates in demographic profiles. Research Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1), 1-7.
  65. Sharma, H. L., & Rani, R. (2013). Relationship of personal growth initiative with self-efficacy among university postgraduate students. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(16), 125-135.
  66. Shigemoto, Y., Ashton, M. W., & Robitschek, C. (2016). Predictors of growth in the aftermath of traumatic events: The role of personal growth initiative. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 21(5), 399-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2015.1110446
  67. Shorey, H. S., Little, T. D., Snyder, C. R., Kluck, B., & Robitschek, C. (2007). Hope and personal growth initiative: A comparison of positive, future-oriented constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(7), 1917-1926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.06.011
  68. Srivastava, S., & Singh, S. (2020). Linking personal growth initiative and organizational identification to employee engagement: testing the mediating-moderating effects in Indian hotel industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 45, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.07.005
  69. Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 240-261.
  70. Stewart, A. B. (2014). Emotional self-efficacy and other psychosocial variables as predictors of personal growth initiative (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation), Educational Psychology, Northern Arizona University.
  71. Tobin, T.J., Muller, R.O. & Turner, L.M. Organizational learning and climate as predictors of self-efficacy. Soc Psychol Educ 9, 301–319 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-4790-z
  72. Turunç, Ö., & Çelik, M. (2010). Çalışanların algıladıkları örgütsel destek ve iş stresinin örgütsel özdeşleşme ve iş performansına etkisi [The effect of perceived organizational support and work stress on organizational identification and job performance]. Journal of Management and Finance, 17(2), 183-206.
  73. Van Emmerik, I. H., Euwema, M. C., & Bakker, A. B. (2007). Threats of workplace violence and the buffering effect of social support. Group & Organization Management, 32(2), 152-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601106286784 Wang, Y. C., Shelley Tien, H. L., & Wu, C. L. (2018). The relation of career adaptability to work–family experience and personal growth initiative among Taiwanese working parents. Journal of Employment Counseling, 55(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/joec.12071
  74. Weigold, I. K., Porfeli, E. J., & Weigold, A. (2013). Examining tenets of personal growth initiative using the Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1396-1403. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034104
  75. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
  76. Yalcin, I., & Malkoç, A. (2013). Adaptation of Personal Growth Initiative Scale-II to Turkish and investigation of psychometric properties. Dusunen Adam The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 26(3), 258-266. https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2013260304
  77. Zhang, L., Qiu, Y., & Teng, E. (2017). Cross-level relationships between justice climate and organizational citizenship behavior: perceived organizational support as mediator. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 45(3), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.4842