SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Leveraging Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms for Energy Efficiency and Carbon Footprint Reduction in Diesel Engines

Emrah Arda(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES)0000-0002-5496-3764
Mehmet Demir(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES)0009-0007-6105-3439
Samet Çelebi(SAKARYA UYGULAMALI BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ARİFİYE MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-4616-3935
Üsame Demir(BILECIK SEYH EDEBALI UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7383-1428
Ömer Seçgin(SAKARYA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES)0000-0001-6158-3164
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-04-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this respect, the study significantly advances the digitization of engine testing in both academia and industry.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, machine learning-based models were employed to estimate brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) using the data derived from 300 experimental engine tests conducted under varying loads, EGR ratios, and fuel combinations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Statistical tools such as the R² coefficient and Mean Square Error (MSE) were utilized to assess the performance of the models.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this respect, the study significantly advances the digitization of engine testing in both academia and industry.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial Intelligence in Combustion Analysis · Diesel Engine · Fuel Consumption Prediction

Abstract

In this study, machine learning-based models were employed to estimate brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) using the data derived from 300 experimental engine tests conducted under varying loads, EGR ratios, and fuel combinations. Eleven alternative algorithms, including AdaBoost, Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, SVM, and Neural Network, were evaluated using datasets derived from real engine data. Statistical tools such as the R² coefficient and Mean Square Error (MSE) were utilized to assess the performance of the models. The best results were derived using Gradient Boosting (R² = 0.9998), AdaBoost (R² = 0.9998), and Random Forest (R² = 0.9997). In the prediction process of the Gradient Boosting model, the minimum absolute error was found to be 0.0000000, and the maximum absolute error was found to be 0.000002. The model's prediction accuracy ranges from 98.30% to 99.39%. This degree of accuracy demonstrates that fuel consumption can be predicted from engine data alone, without installing fuel-measurement equipment. The model's forecasting performance has been examined by analyzing the most and least successful examples. The results simplify fuel-consumption measurement procedures, provide the infrastructure for AI-supported test systems, and reduce time and labor. In this respect, the study significantly advances the digitization of engine testing in both academia and industry.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arda, E., Demir, M., Çelebi, S., Demir, Ü., Seçgin, Ö. (2026). Leveraging Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms for Energy Efficiency and Carbon Footprint Reduction in Diesel Engines. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1896122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (89)

  1. Llopis-Albert C, Rubio F, Valero F. Impact of digital trans-formation on the automotive industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2021;162:120343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120343.
  2. Singh KV, Bansal HO, Singh D. A comprehensive review on hybrid electric vehicles: architectures and components. Jour-nal of Modern Transportation 2019;27:77–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-019-0184-3.
  3. Tzeng S-C, David Huang K, Chen C-C. Optimization of the dual energy-integration mechanism in a parallel-type hybrid vehicle. Appl Energy 2005;80:225–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2004.04.010.
  4. Basurko OC, Uriondo Z. Condition-Based Maintenance for medium speed diesel engines used in vessels in operation. Appl Therm Eng 2015;80:404–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.01.075.
  5. Karabacak YE. Condition monitoring of internal combustion engines with vibration signals and fault detection by using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Auto-motive Engineering and Technologies 2024;13:191–200. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1251886.
  6. Aradi A, Varga AK. Real-Time Acoustic Anomaly Detection in Vehicles Using AI Processor and Machine Learning. Inter-national Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 2025;9:96–100. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1769036.
  7. Fayyazi M, Sardar P, Thomas SI, Daghigh R, Jamali A, Esch T, et al. Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning in Energy Management Systems, Control, and Optimization of Hydro-gen Fuel Cell Vehicles. Sustainability 2023;15:5249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065249.
  8. Ineza Havugimana LF, Liu B, Liu F, Zhang J, Li B, Wan P. Review of Artificial Intelligent Algorithms for Engine Per-formance, Control, and Diagnosis. Energies (Basel) 2023;16:1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031206.
  9. Dam QT. Adaptive PID Controller Design for Velocity Con-trol of a Hydrogen Internal Combustion Engines using RBF Neural Networks. Engineering Perspective 2025;1:41–8. https://doi.org/10.29228/eng.pers.76280.
  10. Sathishkumar S, Ibrahim MM. Evaluation of machine learn-ing algorithms on hydrogen boosted homogeneous charge compression ignition engine operation for performance and emission prediction. Process Safety and Environmental Pro-tection 2025;195:106756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2025.01.010.
  11. Ağbulut Ü, Gürel AE, Sarıdemir S. Experimental investiga-tion and prediction of performance and emission responses of a CI engine fuelled with different metal-oxide based nano-particles–diesel blends using different machine learning algo-rithms. Energy 2021;215:119076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119076.
  12. Küçüksariyildiz H, Çarman K, Sabanci K. Prediction of Spe-cific Fuel Consumption of 60 HP 2WD Tractor Using Artifi-cial Neural Networks. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology 2021;5:436–44. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1010318.
  13. Kabudake P, Kharade YR, Gavahane RS, Mhaske MS. Ceri-um Oxide Blended Biodiesel: Machine Learning and Re-sponse Surface Methodology for Prediction of Responses. In-ternational Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 2024;8:589–601. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1442326.
  14. Çelik A, Kunt MA. A Study on Predicting Engine Perfor-mance Outputs by Machine Learning Algorithms in a Single Cylinder HCCI Engine. Engineering Perspective 2026:57–68. https://doi.org/10.64808/engineeringperspective.1782349.
  15. Lan T, Huang L, Ma R, Ruan Z, Ma S, Li Z, et al. A novel method of fuel consumption prediction for wing-diesel hy-brid ships based on high-dimensional feature selection and improved blending ensemble learning method. Ocean Engi-neering 2024;307:118156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118156.
  16. Godwin DJ, Varuvel EG, Martin MLJ. Prediction of combus-tion, performance, and emission parameters of ethanol pow-ered spark ignition engine using ensemble Least Squares boosting machine learning algorithms. J Clean Prod 2023;421:138401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138401.
  17. Güngör C. Application of RSM for prediction and optimiza-tion of performance and emissions of diesel engine fuelled with butanol-diesel blends. International Journal of Automo-tive Engineering and Technologies 2025;14:98–109. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1565350.
  18. Coşman S. Experimental Assessment of N-((2-Chloropyridin-3-yl) Carbamothioyl) Thiophene-2-Carboxamide in a Spark-Ignition Engine Operating on Di-chloromethane – Gasoline Blend. Engineering Perspective 2026;6:92–105. https://doi.org/10.64808/engineeringperspective.1839259.
  19. Koca S, Zincirci O, Aktaş F. Investigation of the Effect of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics in Diesel Engines. International Journal of Au-tomotive Science And Technology 2024;8:242–51. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1478380.
  20. Dezong Zhao, Stobart R, Guangyu Dong, Winward E. Real-Time Energy Management for Diesel Heavy Duty Hybrid Electric Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 2015;23:829–41. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2014.2343939.
  21. Niroomand N, Bach C. Integrating Machine Learning for Predicting Internal Combustion Engine Performance and Segment-Based CO 2 Emissions Across Urban and Rural Set-tings. IEEE Access 2024;12:66223–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3399025.
  22. Kasap M, Çinar E, Yazici A, Özkan K. An Experimental Evaluation Of Intelligent Fault Detection And Classification For Induction Motors Utilizing Machine Learning Approaches. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 2021;29:126–36. https://doi.org/10.31796/ogummf.853090.
  23. Çakır Şencan A, Duran A, Şeker U, Koçak MR, Şencan C. The Effect of Internal and External MQL Methods Used for Environmentally Friendly Manufacturing on Machining Per-formance in Drilling AA2024 Alloys: A Comparison for ANN And Taguchi Analyzes. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi 2025;27:86–98. https://doi.org/10.21205/deufmd.2025277912.
  24. Ozkul T, Topallı A. Comparison of machine learning meth-ods for limited predictive maintenance. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi 2025;14:183–91. https://doi.org/10.28948/NGUMUH.1465282.
  25. Kaan B, Tarihi G. Comparison of hybrid binary GWO-PSO algorithm with feature selection methods by using machine learning classifiers. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri En-stitüsü Dergisi 2025;27:170–87. https://doi.org/10.25092/BAUNFBED.1469682.
  26. Sok R, Jeyamoorthy A, Kusaka J. Novel virtual sensors de-velopment based on machine learning combined with convo-lutional neural-network image processing-translation for feedback control systems of internal combustion engines. Appl Energy 2024;365:123224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2024.123224.
  27. van Engelen JE, Hoos HH. A survey on semi-supervised learning. Mach Learn 2020;109:373–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10994-019-05855-6/FIGURES/5.
  28. Qi GJ, Luo J. Small Data Challenges in Big Data Era: A Sur-vey of Recent Progress on Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2022;44:2168–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3031898.
  29. Chen Y, Mancini M, Zhu X, Akata Z. Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Deep Visual Learning: A Survey. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2024;46:1327–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3201576.
  30. Alnuaimi AFAH, Albaldawi THK. An overview of machine learning classification techniques. BIO Web Conf 2024;97:00133. https://doi.org/10.1051/BIOCONF/20249700133.
  31. Sen PC, Hajra M, Ghosh M. Supervised Classification Algo-rithms in Machine Learning: A Survey and Review. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 2020;937:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7403-6_11.
  32. Gülcan He, Gültekin N, Ciniviz M. Effect of diesel injection pressure for enhancing combustion and reducing mechanical vibration and noise emissions in a non-road diesel engine. Eu-ropean Mechanical Science 2023;7:199–208. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1337141.
  33. P K, S N, M P SK, Rashid M, S N. Optimization of Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions Characteristics with To-mato Seed Blends and EGR Using Response Surface Meth-odology. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology 2023;7:223–33. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1326036.
  34. Savaş A, Uslu S, Saral Ş. Enabling a Sustainable Diesel Fu-ture: Emission Control and Performance Enhancement with B₂O₃ Nanoparticles via RSM Optimization. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 2025;9:174–85. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1679467.
  35. Çelebi S, Demir Ü. Noise and vibration behavior of a diesel engine operating with CNT-blended fuels and different EGR rates. International Journal of Automotive Engineering and Technologies 2025;14:199–214. https://doi.org/10.18245/ijaet.1651115.
  36. Gültekin N, Gülcan He, Ciniviz M. Determination of effects of some alcohol blends on performance, emission, mechani-cal vibration and noise in diesel engines. European Mechani-cal Science 2023;7:259–67. https://doi.org/10.26701/ems.1337150.
  37. Poorghasemi K, Saray RK, Solmaz H, Mousavi SM, Zehni A. Multi-Dimensional 3D-CFD/Chemical-Kinetics Modeling of Natural Gas–Diesel RCCI Engines: Combustion Phasing, Ef-ficiency and Emissions. Engineering Perspective 2026;6:69–82. https://doi.org/10.64808/engineeringperspective.1802746.
  38. Chen Y, Zheng Z, Lu Z, Wang H, Wang C, Sun X, et al. Ma-chine learning-based screening of fuel properties for SI and CI engines using a hybrid group extraction method. Appl En-ergy 2024;366:123257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123257.
  39. Ficenec K, Singer M, Hodge C. Predicting U.S. federal fleet electric vehicle charging patterns using internal combustion engine vehicle fueling transaction statistics. Appl Energy 2025;378:124778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124778.
  40. Zhu Y, He Z, Xuan T, Shao Z. An enhanced automated ma-chine learning model for optimizing cycle-to-cycle variation in hydrogen-enriched methanol engines. Appl Energy 2024;362:123019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123019.
  41. Domínguez VM, Hernández JJ, Ramos Á, Rodríguez-Fernández J. Role of the Compression Ratio in Dual-Fuel Compression Ignition Combustion with Hydrogen and Meth-anol. Energy & Fuels 2024;38:19127–36. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.4c02741.
  42. Cameretti MC, De Robbio R, Tuccillo R, Perrone D, Castiglione T. CFD Modelling and Experimental Validation of an Ethanol Spark-Ignition Heavy-Duty Engine. Energies (Ba-sel) 2025;18:3349. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18133349.
  43. Olson AL, Tunér M, Verhelst S. Investigation of the combus-tion characteristics and knock tendencies of neat C1–C4 al-cohol fuels using a CFR engine. Fuel 2025;381:133499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133499.
  44. Shi J, Wang C, Zhang W, Meng K. Effects of Biodiesel–Ethanol–Graphene Droplet Volume and Graphene Content on Microexplosion: Distribution, Velocity and Acceleration of Secondary Droplets. Processes 2025;13:2646. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr13082646.
  45. Zhuang Y, Qian Y, Hong G. Lean Burn Performance of a Spark Ignition Engine with an Ethanol–Gasoline Dual Injec-tion System. Energy & Fuels 2018;32:2855–68. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03028.
  46. Can Ö, Öztürk E, Arcaklioğlu E. Artificial neural network based determination of the performance and emissions of a Diesel engine using ethanol-diesel fuel blends. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology 2021;5:43–51. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.805531.
  47. Gamboa D, Herrera B, Acevedo J, López D, Cacua K. Ex-perimental evaluation of a diesel engine using amide-functionalized carbon nanotubes as additives in commercial diesel and palm-oil biodiesel. International Journal of Ther-mofluids 2024;22:100669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2024.100669.
  48. Jokubynienė V, Slavinskas S. The Effect of ZnO and CNT Nanoparticles on the Combustion Characteristics and Emis-sion Performance of a Common Rail Diesel Engine Fueled with Diesel and Biodiesel. Energies (Basel) 2025;18:2564. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18102564.
  49. Jokubynienė V, Slavinskas S, Kreivaitis R. The Effect of Nanoparticle Additives on the Lubricity of Diesel and Bio-diesel Fuels. Lubricants 2023;11:290. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants11070290.
  50. Ali MM, Paul BK, Ahmed K, Bui FM, Quinn JMW, Moni MA. Heart disease prediction using supervised machine learn-ing algorithms: Performance analysis and comparison. Com-put Biol Med 2021;136:104672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104672.
  51. Uddin S, Khan A, Hossain ME, Moni MA. Comparing dif-ferent supervised machine learning algorithms for disease prediction. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019;19:281. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-1004-8.
  52. Jiao H. Application of Supervised Learning Algorithms in Data Prediction. Applied and Computational Engineering 2025;133:122–8. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2025.20609.
  53. Alloghani M, Al-Jumeily D, Mustafina J, Hussain A, Aljaaf AJ. A Systematic Review on Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Data Science, 2020, p. 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22475-2_1.
  54. Gao Huang, Shiji Song, Gupta JND, Cheng Wu. Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Extreme Learning Machines. IEEE Trans Cybern 2014;44:2405–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2014.2307349.
  55. Qi G-J, Luo J. Small Data Challenges in Big Data Era: A Sur-vey of Recent Progress on Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Methods. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2022;44:2168–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3031898.
  56. Sinaga KP, Yang M-S. Unsupervised K-Means Clustering Algorithm. IEEE Access 2020;8:80716–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988796.
  57. Naeem S, Ali A, Anam S, Ahmed MM. An Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithms: Comprehensive Review. Inter-national Journal of Computing and Digital Systems 2023;13:911–21. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/130172.
  58. van Engelen JE, Hoos HH. A survey on semi-supervised learning. Mach Learn 2020;109:373–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6.
  59. Yang X, Song Z, King I, Xu Z. A Survey on Deep Semi-Supervised Learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2023;35:8934–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2022.3220219.
  60. Szepesvári C. Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning. 2009.
  61. Naeem M, Rizvi STH, Coronato A. A Gentle Introduction to Reinforcement Learning and its Application in Different Fields. IEEE Access 2020;8:209320–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3038605.
  62. Shakya AK, Pillai G, Chakrabarty S. Reinforcement learning algorithms: A brief survey. Expert Syst Appl 2023;231:120495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120495.
  63. Todorov E, Jordan MI. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. Nat Neurosci 2002;5:1226–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn963.
  64. Liu D, Todorov E. Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control. The Jour-nal of Neuroscience 2007;27:9354–68. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1110-06.2007.
  65. Rahmaty M. Machine learning with big data to solve real-world problems. Journal of Data Analytics 2023;2:9–16. https://doi.org/10.59615/jda.2.1.9.
  66. Lary DJ, Alavi AH, Gandomi AH, Walker AL. Machine learning in geosciences and remote sensing. Geoscience Fron-tiers 2016;7:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2015.07.003.
  67. Sarker IH. Machine Learning: Algorithms, Real-World Ap-plications and Research Directions. SN Comput Sci 2021;2:160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00592-x.
  68. Liu J, He W, Wang Y, Zhang B. Evaluation of dimensionali-ty reduction and unsupervised clustering methods in breast datasets. Applied and Computational Engineering 2024;31:218–28. https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/31/20230153.
  69. Narula P. Analysis of Unsupervised Clustering Algorithms and Impact of Dimensionality Reduction: A Data Driven Ap-proach. Machine Learning and Applications: An International Journal 2025;12:169–84. https://doi.org/10.5121/mlaij.2025.12111.
  70. Saputra DM, Saputra D, Oswari LD. Effect of Distance Met-rics in Determining K-Value in K-Means Clustering Using El-bow and Silhouette Method. Proceedings of the Sriwijaya In-ternational Conference on Information Technology and Its Applications (SICONIAN 2019), Paris, France: Atlantis Press; 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisr.k.200424.051.
  71. U.O. E, O.O. M, G. O-O, H. N. C. New K-means Clustering Method Using Minkowski’s Distance as its Metric. British Journal of Computer, Networking and Information Technolo-gy 2021;4:28–41. https://doi.org/10.52589/BJCNIT-XEPSJBWX.
  72. Afzal S, Afzal A, Amin M, Saleem S, Ali N, Sajid M. A Novel Approach for Outlier Detection in Multivariate Data. Math Probl Eng 2021;2021:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1899225.
  73. Gewers FL, Ferreira GR, Arruda HF De, Silva FN, Comin CH, Amancio DR, et al. Principal Component Analysis. ACM Comput Surv 2022;54:1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3447755.
  74. Wilkinson L. Visualizing Big Data Outliers Through Distrib-uted Aggregation. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2018;24:256–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744685.
  75. Karagöl T, Karagöl A. Benchmarking GROMACS on Opti-mized Colab Processors and the Flexibility of Cloud Compu-ting for Molecular Dynamics 2024. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.14.623563.
  76. V V, C RA, Suhas B, T A. Solution for XOR Problem with Neural Networks Using Google Colab and MATLAB / Sim-ulink. Saudi Journal of Engineering and Technology 2023;8:16–28. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjet.2023.v08i01.003.
  77. Ye JC. Linear, Logistic, and Kernel Regression, 2022, p. 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6046-7_3.
  78. Skiena SS. The Data Science Design Manual. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55444-0.
  79. Praveen Gujjar J, Prasanna Kumar HR, Chiplunkar NN. Im-age classification and prediction using transfer learning in colab notebook. Global Transitions Proceedings 2021;2:382–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gltp.2021.08.068.
  80. Li Z. Construction of Computer Mathematical Model Based on Improved Algorithm. 2023 International Conference on Data Science and Network Security (ICDSNS), IEEE; 2023, p. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDSNS58469.2023.10245626.
  81. Castro-Amoedo R, Granacher J, Maréchal F. A combined genetic algorithm and active learning approach to build and test surrogate models in Process Systems Engineering. Com-put Chem Eng 2024;181:108517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108517.
  82. Gao T, Lu W. Reduced-order electrochemical models with shape functions for fast, accurate prediction of lithium-ion batteries under high C-rates. Appl Energy 2024;353:121954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121954.
  83. Aradi A, Varga AK. Real-Time Acoustic Anomaly Detection in Vehicles Using AI Processor and Machine Learning. Inter-national Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 2025;9:96–100. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1769036.
  84. Küçüksariyildiz H, Çarman K, Sabanci K. Prediction of Spe-cific Fuel Consumption of 60 HP 2WD Tractor Using Artifi-cial Neural Networks. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology 2021;5:436–44. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1010318.
  85. Kabudake P, Kharade YR, Gavahane RS, Mhaske MS. Ceri-um Oxide Blended Biodiesel: Machine Learning and Re-sponse Surface Methodology for Prediction of Responses. In-ternational Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 2024;8:589–601. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1442326.
  86. Koca S, Zincirci O, Aktaş F. Investigation of the Effect of TiO2 Nanoparticles on Engine Performance and Emission Characteristics in Diesel Engines. International Journal of Au-tomotive Science And Technology 2024;8:242–51. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1478380.
  87. P K, S N, M P SK, Rashid M, S N. Optimization of Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions Characteristics with To-mato Seed Blends and EGR Using Response Surface Meth-odology. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology 2023;7:223–33. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1326036.
  88. Savaş A, Uslu S, Saral Ş. Enabling a Sustainable Diesel Fu-ture: Emission Control and Performance Enhancement with B₂O₃ Nanoparticles via RSM Optimization. International Journal of Automotive Science And Technology 2025;9:174–85. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1679467.
  89. Can Ö, Öztürk E, Arcaklioğlu E. Artificial neural network based determination of the performance and emissions of a Diesel engine using ethanol-diesel fuel blends. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology 2021;5:43–51. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.805531.