Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Development of a Route-Specific Driving Cycle for the Istanbul Metrobus Line: Integration of Operational Dynamics and Topography

Bayram Hasan Yiğit(Ulaşım İç ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş.)0000-0001-8221-128X
Oğuzhan Arı(Ulaşım İç ve Dış Ticaret A.Ş.)0009-0002-4196-9435
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-03-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These profiles were integrated into MATLAB/Simulink-based vehicle dynamics and powertrain simulations to realistically estimate traction force, road resistance, regenerative braking potential, and overall energy demand.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a route-specific driving cycle for the Beylikdüzü–Söğütlüçeşme–Beylikdüzü Istanbul Metrobus line was developed to reflect its operational and topographical characteristics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:High-resolution telemetry data were collected from 132 LF25 diesel buses, including speed, acceleration, stop times, and segment-based speed profiles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These profiles were integrated into MATLAB/Simulink-based vehicle dynamics and powertrain simulations to realistically estimate traction force, road resistance, regenerative braking potential, and overall energy demand.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:LF25 Diesel Metrobus · LF25 Electric Metrobus · Istanbul Metrobus Route

Abstract

In this study, a route-specific driving cycle for the Beylikdüzü–Söğütlüçeşme–Beylikdüzü Istanbul Metrobus line was developed to reflect its operational and topographical characteristics. The cycle considers real-world gradients, frequent stops, and high passenger loads, addressing the limitations of standard flat-road assumptions. High-resolution telemetry data were collected from 132 LF25 diesel buses, including speed, acceleration, stop times, and segment-based speed profiles. Five representative vehicles were selected based on statistical consistency, and vehicle motion was divided into acceleration, constant speed, deceleration, and stop phases. Time-based speed and distance values were calculated for each segment, and stop altitudes along the route were obtained from Google Earth with linear interpolation applied to generate continuous distance–altitude profiles. These profiles were integrated into MATLAB/Simulink-based vehicle dynamics and powertrain simulations to realistically estimate traction force, road resistance, regenerative braking potential, and overall energy demand. The simulation framework enables evaluation of energy consumption and powertrain performance for 25-meter bi-articulated electric Metrobus vehicles. The developed driving cycle provides a robust representation of real operational conditions and serves as a foundation for future studies on energy efficiency, motor torque requirements, and battery performance. Furthermore, the methodology can be adapted for electric or fuel-cell public transit vehicles, supporting the transition toward zero-emission urban transportation in Istanbul.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yiğit, B. H., Arı, O., Karamangil, M. İ. (2026). Development of a Route-Specific Driving Cycle for the Istanbul Metrobus Line: Integration of Operational Dynamics and Topography. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1836826

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Bostancı S, Tanrıvermiş Y. Türkiye’de Kent İçi Ulaşım Sorun-ları ve Çözüm Önerileri: Ankara İli Örneği. Kent Akademisi Dergisi. 2024;17(2):346. https://doi.org/10.35674/kent1408317
  2. Deng T, Nelson JD. Recent developments in bus rapid transit: a review of the literature. Transp Rev. 2011;31(1):69-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.492455
  3. Yazıcı MA, Levinson HS, Kamga C. A Bus Rapid Transit Line Case Study: Istanbul’s Metrobüs System. J Public Trans. 2013;16(1). https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.1.8
  4. Rendek KE. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): The B-Line Services, A Transit Innovation for Greater Vancouver. Calgary; 2002.
  5. Yılmaz A. Powertrain Sizing, Power and Energy Management of 18 Meters Series Hybrid Electric BRT for Metrobus İstan-bul. Presented at the OTEKON; 2016; Bursa, Turkey.
  6. Yurdagül E. İstanbul Avcılar-Söğütlüçeşme Metrobüs Sistemi-nin Bileşenlerinin Değerlendirmesi ve Dünyadaki Metrobüs Sistemleri ile Karşılaştırılması [thesis]. İstanbul Technical Uni-versity; 2012.
  7. Kaymaz H, Korkmaz H, Erdal H. Development of a driving cycle for Istanbul bus rapid transit based on real-world data using stratified sampling method. Transp Res D Transp Envi-ron. 2019;75:123-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.023
  8. Sezer V. Metrobüs Şaft Torkunun Sınırlandırılmasına Yönelik Hibrit Güç Aktarma Yapısı ve Güç Yönetim Sistemi Tasarımı. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2018. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.316190
  9. Timuçin B. Hibrit Elektrikli Otobüste (Phileas) Sürücü Sistem-lerinin Modellenmesi ve Güç Aktarma Organlarının Tasarımı [thesis]. Yıldız Technical University; 2016.
  10. Cervero R. Bus Rapid Transit (BRT): An Efficient and Com-petitive Mode of Public Transport. Report No. 2013-01; 2013.
  11. Yılmazlar AM. Dizel Motorlu Otobüsler için Yakıt Tü-ketiminin Sanal Analizi ve Optimizasyonu [thesis]. Sakarya University; 2025.
  12. Mišanović S, Spasojević V. Measurement the Fuel Consump-tion of Buses for Public Transport by The Methodology “SORT” (Standardised On-Road Tests Cycles). Mobility & Vehicle Mechanics. 2015;41(2):56-63.
  13. Demuynck J, Bosteels D, De Paepe M, Favre C, May J, Ver-helst S. Recommendations for the new WLTP cycle based on an analysis of vehicle emission measurements on NEDC and CADC. Energy Policy. 2012;49:234-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.081
  14. Altay A. Elektrikli Otobüslerin Metrobüs Hattında Kullanımının Tekno-Ekonomik Analizi [thesis]. Yıldız Tech-nical University; 2017.
  15. Kaymaz H. Hibrit ve Elektrikli Metrobüs Araçları İçin Sürüş Çevrimi Oluşturulması [thesis]. Marmara University; 2018.
  16. Keskin H. The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Transition from BRT System to Bi-Articulated Trolleybus System in İstanbul [thesis]. Sabancı University; 2019.
  17. Tanyeri MN. An Electrification Solution for İstanbul Metrobus Line [thesis]. Hacettepe University; 2019.
  18. Yiğit BH, Karamangil İ. Selection powertrain for 25 m bi-articulated series hybrid, electric or fuel cell vehicle operation on Istanbul Bus Rapid Transit Line. Eng Sci Tech Int J. 2024;54:101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101719
  19. Yiğit BH, Arı O, Karamangil İ. İstanbul Metrobüs Hattı Çevriminin Geliştirilmesi. Presented at the OTEKON; 2024; Bursa, Turkey.
  20. Ekici YE, Akdağ O, Yıldıran N, Karadağ T. The Impact of Driver Behavior on Electric Bus Energy Consumption: Opti-mizing Driver Performance with Bio-Inspired WUTP Algo-rithm with Real-Time Big Data. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(4):602-617. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1789079
  21. Jazar RN. Vehicle Dynamics: Theory and Application. 3rd ed. Springer; 2017.
  22. Jamadar N, Jamadar S. Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Manage-ment in Electric Vehicles. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(3):397-408. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1711318
  23. Ekici YE, Akdağ O, Yıldıran N, Karadağ T. The Impact of Driver Behavior on Electric Bus Energy Consumption: Opti-mizing Driver Performance with Bio-Inspired WUTP Algo-rithm with Real-Time Big Data. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(4):602-617. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1789079
  24. Jamadar N, Jamadar S. Comparative Analysis of Multi-Objective and Multi-Verse Optimization for Energy Manage-ment in Electric Vehicles. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(3):397-408. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1711318