SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 3

Integration of Topology Optimization and ANN-Based Shape Optimization for Weight Reduction of a Control Arm

Mehmet Kopar(OSTIM TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7347-4192
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-09
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that meta-heuristic optimization reduced the weight of the lower control arm by approximately 11.4%, while the maximum stress increased by approximately 6%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study employs an integrated approach using topology optimization, artificial neural networks (ANN) based models, and meta-heuristic algorithms to reduce the weight of a lower control arm, a component of automotive suspension.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, topology optimization of the part was performed using the finite element method, resulting in a 7.83% reduction in the weight of the lower control arm compared to the main model.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that meta-heuristic optimization reduced the weight of the lower control arm by approximately 11.4%, while the maximum stress increased by approximately 6%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artificial neural network · Control arm · Light weight

Abstract

This study employs an integrated approach using topology optimization, artificial neural networks (ANN) based models, and meta-heuristic algorithms to reduce the weight of a lower control arm, a component of automotive suspension. First, topology optimization of the part was performed using the finite element method, resulting in a 7.83% reduction in the weight of the lower control arm compared to the main model. Following topology optimization, the lower control arm was redesigned, six geometric design variables were created, and ANN-based proxy models were developed to estimate mass-stress values. These proxy models achieved faster and more efficient optimization than the finite element method. During the optimization process, comparisons were made with Genetic Algorithm (GA), Grey Wolf Algorithm (GWO), and Starfish Optimization Algorithm (SFOA). The results showed that meta-heuristic optimization reduced the weight of the lower control arm by approximately 11.4%, while the maximum stress increased by approximately 6%. Despite this increase in stress, the component remained within safe operating limits. Among the evaluated algorithms, SFOA produced a marginally lower weight estimate than GA and GWO under the adopted optimization settings. As a result of the study, it was shown that meta-heuristic algorithms supported by ANN-based surrogate models can be used for weight reduction in automotive sub-control arms.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kopar, M. (2026). Integration of Topology Optimization and ANN-Based Shape Optimization for Weight Reduction of a Control Arm. International Journal of Automotive Science and Technology, Volume: 10 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech..1946704

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Lee S, Kang N. Vehicle suspension recommendation system: multi-fidelity neural network-based mechanism design optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2025;68(3):44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-024-03957-x
  2. Romero J, Queipo N. Reliability-based and deterministic design optimization of a FSAE brake pedal: a risk allocation analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2017;56(3):681-695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1747-8
  3. Li J, Tan J, Dong J. Lightweight design of front suspension upright of electric formula car based on topology optimization method. World Electr Veh J. 2020;11(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj11010015
  4. Borda F, La Rosa AD, Filice L, Gagliardi F. Environmental impact of process constrained topology optimization design on automotive component’ life. Int J Mater Form. 2023;16(5):48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01771-2
  5. Tyflopoulos E, Lien M, Steinert M. Optimization of brake calipers using topology optimization for additive manufacturing. Appl Sci. 2021;11(4):1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041437
  6. Ismail AY, Na G, Koo B. Topology and response surface optimization of a bicycle crank arm with multiple load cases. Appl Sci. 2020;10(6):2201. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10062201
  7. Li C, Kim IY, Jeswiet J. Conceptual and detailed design of an automotive engine cradle by using topology, shape, and size optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2015;51(2):547-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1151-6
  8. Dao TP. Structural optimization and modelling for a new topology-optimized compliant gripper. Eng Optim. 2026:1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2026.2625030
  9. Zhu P, Zhang Y, Chen G. Metamodeling development for reliability-based design optimization of automotive body structure. Comput Ind. 2011;62(7):729-741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2011.05.008
  10. Ni P, Su X, Fu J, Bai Y. A hybrid snake optimizer with crisscross learning strategy for constrained structural optimization. Eng Optim. 2026;58(2):488-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2025.2469664
  11. Zuo W. An object-oriented graphics interface design and optimization software for cross-sectional shape of automobile body. Adv Eng Softw. 2013;64:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.04.003
  12. Doğan O, Kalay O, Kartal E, Karpat F. Optimum design of brake pedal for trucks using structural optimization and design of experiment techniques. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2020;4(4):272-280. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.783552
  13. Butkewitsch S, Steffen V Jr. Shape optimization, model updating and empirical modeling applied to the design synthesis of a heavy truck side guard. Int J Solids Struct. 2002;39(18):4747-4771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00372-4
  14. Tan Y, Zhang S, Qian S, Song J. Weighted topology optimization of back-up supporting structures of antennas. Eng Optim. 2024;56(6):874-895. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2023.2208030
  15. Geng D, Yan J, Xu Q, Zhang Q, Zhou M, Fan Z, et al. Real-time structure topology optimization using CNN driven moving morphable component method. Eng Struct. 2023;290:116376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116376
  16. Hsu MH, Hsu YL. Generalization of two- and three-dimensional structural topology optimization. Eng Optim. 2005;37(1):83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150412331271208
  17. Wang L, Tang L, Wu P, Chen J. Research on the optimization of automobile plastic front frame structure. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2022;2022:2340342. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2340342
  18. Sandalcılar H, Çağırankaya F, Arslanoğlu M, Dikici B. Structural optimization of a Formula Student upright using the BESO method: enhancing performance through lightweight design. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(4):536-546. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1724606
  19. Huri D, Mankovits T. Parameter selection of local search algorithm for design optimization of automotive rubber bumper. Appl Sci. 2020;10(10):3584. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10103584
  20. Gürses D. Optimal design of automobile suspension control arm using metaheuristic algorithms. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(3):305-309. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1749077
  21. Almonti D, Salvi D, Mingione E, Vesco S. Lightweight and sustainable steering knuckle via topology optimization and rapid investment casting. J Manuf Mater Process. 2025;9(8):252. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp9080252
  22. Armentani E, Giannella V, Parente A, Pirelli M. Design for NVH: topology optimization of an engine bracket support. Procedia Struct Integr. 2020;26:211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.06.024
  23. Choi JW, Kim MG, Kim JJ, Kim J. Topology optimization of automotive vibration test jig: natural frequency maximization and weight reduction. Mathematics. 2025;13(11):1716. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13111716
  24. Kaur A, Singh L, Dhillon JS. Modified krill herd algorithm for constrained economic load dispatch problem. Int J Ambient Energy. 2022;43(1):4332-4342. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2021.1888798
  25. Qin H, Liu Z, Zhong H, Liu Y, Lv C. Two-level multiple cross-sectional shape optimization of automotive body frame with exact static and dynamic stiffness constraints. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2018;58(5):2309-2323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2025-0
  26. Salmani H, Khalkhali A, Ahmadi A. Multi-objective optimization of vehicle floor panel with a laminated structure based on V-shape development model and Taguchi-based grey relational analysis. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2022;65(3):95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-03100-0
  27. Triller J, Lopez ML, Nossek M, Frenzel MA. Multidisciplinary optimization of automotive mega-castings merging classical structural optimization with response-surface-based optimization enhanced by machine learning. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):21678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47937-5
  28. Gupta S, Abderazek H, Yıldız BS, Yildiz AR, Mirjalili S, Sait SM. Comparison of metaheuristic optimization algorithms for solving constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;183:115351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115351
  29. Yang Y, Chen H, Heidari AA, Gandomi AH. Hunger games search: visions, conception, implementation, deep analysis, perspectives, and towards performance shifts. Expert Syst Appl. 2021;177:114864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114864
  30. Hussien AG. An enhanced opposition-based Salp swarm algorithm for global optimization and engineering problems. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022;13(1):129-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-02892-9
  31. Abualigah L, Yousri D, Abd Elaziz M, Ewees AA, Al-Qaness MAA, Gandomi AH. Aquila optimizer: a novel meta-heuristic optimization algorithm. Comput Ind Eng. 2021;157:107250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107250
  32. Xu Z, Gui W, Heidari AA, Liang G, Chen H, Wu C, et al. Spiral motion mode embedded grasshopper optimization algorithm: design and analysis. IEEE Access. 2021;9:71104-71132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3077616
  33. Pereira JLJ, Guedes FC, Francisco MB, Chiarello AG, Gomes GF. Multi-objective design optimization of a high performance disk brake using Lichtenberg algorithm. Mech Based Des Struct Mach. 2024;52(6):3038-3051. https://doi.org/10.1080/15397734.2023.2197034
  34. Akçay Ö, İlkılıç C. Light-weight design of aerospace components using genetic algorithm and dandelion optimization algorithm. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci. 2025;26(5):2898-2909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-025-00900-2
  35. Akçay Ö, İlkılıç C. Structural optimization of the brake pedal using artificial intelligence. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2023;7(3):187-195. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1330096
  36. Zhou D, Wang Y, Li S, Mao X, Zhou C, Kang Z, et al. Optimization of aluminum alloy steering knuckle for automotive lightweighting and performance enhancement. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng. 2025;47(7):327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-025-05575-0
  37. Selim A, Kamel S, Alghamdi AS, Jurado F. Optimal placement of DGs in distribution system using an improved Harris Hawks optimizer based on single- and multi-objective approaches. IEEE Access. 2020;8:52815-52829. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2980245
  38. Dhawale D, Kamboj VK, Anand P. An effective solution to numerical and multi-disciplinary design optimization problems using chaotic slime mold algorithm. Eng Comput. 2022;38(Suppl 4):2739-2777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01409-4
  39. Duan Y, Liu C, Li S, Guo X, Yang C. Manta ray foraging and Gaussian mutation-based elephant herding optimization for global optimization. Eng Comput. 2023;39(2):1085-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-021-01494-5
  40. Talatahari S, Azizi M. Optimization of constrained mathematical and engineering design problems using chaos game optimization. Comput Ind Eng. 2020;145:106560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106560
  41. Kaur M, Kaur R, Singh N, Dhiman G. SChoA: a newly fusion of sine and cosine with chimp optimization algorithm for HLS of datapaths in digital filters and engineering applications. Eng Comput. 2022;38(Suppl 2):975-1003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01233-2
  42. Nandi A, Kamboj VK. A meliorated Harris Hawks optimizer for combinatorial unit commitment problem with photovoltaic applications. J Electr Syst Inf Technol. 2021;8(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43067-020-00026-3
  43. Ridha HM, Heidari AA, Wang M, Chen H. Boosted mutation-based Harris hawks optimizer for parameters identification of single-diode solar cell models. Energy Convers Manag. 2020;209:112660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112660
  44. Hu H, Ao Y, Bai Y, Cheng R, Xu T. An improved Harris's Hawks optimization for SAR target recognition and stock market index prediction. IEEE Access. 2020;8:65891-65910. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985596
  45. Alexakis K, Benekis V, Kokkinakos P, Askounis D. Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimisation for energy-efficient building retrofitting: a systematic review. Energy Build. 2025;328:115216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115216
  46. Nematzadeh H, García-Nieto J, Hurtado S, Aldana-Montes JF, Navas-Delgado I. Model-agnostic local explanation: multi-objective genetic algorithm explainer. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2025;139:109628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109628
  47. Uzunoglu A, Gahm C, Tuma A. Machine learning based algorithm selection and genetic algorithms for serial-batch scheduling. Comput Oper Res. 2025;173:106827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2024.106827
  48. Sadraei S, Gholhaki M, Rezaifar O. Model updating method for detect and localize structural damage using generalized flexibility matrix and improved grey wolf optimizer algorithm (I-GWO). Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):24300. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09499-6
  49. Dagal I, Ibrahim AW, Harrison A. Leveraging a novel grey wolf algorithm for optimization of photovoltaic-battery energy storage system under partial shading conditions. Comput Electr Eng. 2025;122:109991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2024.109991
  50. Tabar ME, Katlav M, Turk K. Explainable ensemble algorithms with grey wolf optimization for estimation of the tensile performance of polyethylene fiber-reinforced engineered cementitious composite. Mater Today Commun. 2025;44:112028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2025.112028
  51. Zhong C, Li G, Meng Z, Li H, Yildiz AR, Mirjalili S. Starfish optimization algorithm (SFOA): a bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization compared with 100 optimizers. Neural Comput Appl. 2025;37(5):3641-3683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-10694-1
  52. Wang X, Lin K, Guo G, Wen X, Chen D. Research on high-density discrete seismic signal denoising processing method based on the SFOA-VMD algorithm. Geosciences. 2025;15(11):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15110409
  53. Doğan O, Kalay O, Kartal E, Karpat F. Optimum design of brake pedal for trucks using structural optimization and design of experiment techniques. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2020;4(4):272-280. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.783552
  54. Sandalcılar H, Çağırankaya F, Arslanoğlu M, Dikici B. Structural optimization of a Formula Student upright using the BESO method: enhancing performance through lightweight design. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(4):536-546. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1724606
  55. Gürses D. Optimal design of automobile suspension control arm using metaheuristic algorithms. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2025;9(3):305-309. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1749077
  56. Akçay Ö, İlkılıç C. Structural optimization of the brake pedal using artificial intelligence. Int J Automot Sci Technol. 2023;7(3):187-195. https://doi.org/10.30939/ijastech.1330096