Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2005 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Attitudinal Belief on Adoption of E-MBA Program in Malaysia

Pages
115–124
Publication Date
2005-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results indicated that trialability and image were significant influencing behavior intention towards e-MBA adoption.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:E-learning describes the use of information communications technology for learning beyond the boundaries of the conventional classroom.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this paper is to determine what are the factors that are significant in explaining intention towards e-learning, particularly e-MBA adoption in Malaysia .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results indicated that trialability and image were significant influencing behavior intention towards e-MBA adoption.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Attitudinal Belief · Behavior Intention · Higher Learning.

Abstract

E-learning describes the use of information communications technology for learning beyond the boundaries of the conventional classroom. The objective of this paper is to determine what are the factors that are significant in explaining intention towards e-learning, particularly e-MBA adoption in Malaysia . Results indicated that trialability and image were significant influencing behavior intention towards e-MBA adoption.

🔖

Cite This Article

MAHMOD, R., DAHLAN, N., RAMAYAH, T., KARIA, N., ASAARI, M. H. A. H. (2005). Attitudinal Belief on Adoption of E-MBA Program in Malaysia. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 115–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/140846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 179-211.
  2. Ajzen, I. (2001). “Nature and operation of attitude,” Annual Review of Psychology, 52:1,2760. Asirvatham, D. (2001). “E-Learning: Evolution of education,” DISVE-2001
  3. Symposium, November 16-17, 2002,
  4. Pusan, Korea. Azmi, T. (2002). “Multimedia and e-learning: A new direction for productivity promotion and enhancement,” Report of the APO Seminar, March 25-29,
  5. Republic of China. Chang, M.K. & Cheung, W. (2001). “Determinants of the intention to use Internet/www at work: A confirmatory study,” Information and Management, 39, 1-14.
  6. Choi, H., Choi, M., Kim, J., & Yu, H. (2002). “An empirical study on the adoption of information appliances with a focus on interactive TV,” Telematics and Informatics, Uncorrected proof. Davis, F.D. (1989). “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13: 3, 319-340.
  7. Hair, J.F. Jr., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc. Jeong, M. & Lambert, C.U. (2002). “Adaptation of an informational quality framework to measure customers’ behavioral intentions to use lodging web sites,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20, 129-146.
  8. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W. & Chervany, M.L. (1999). “Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs,” MIS Quarterly, 23: 2, 183-213.
  9. Kwon, H.S. & Chidambaram, L (2000). “A test of the technology acceptance model: The case of cellular telephone adoption,” Proceeding of the 3rd. Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences, 3-6.
  10. Lord, D. (2000). “Critical success factors in online education,” The International Journal of Educational Management, 14: 5, 216-223.
  11. Morris, M.G. & Dillon, A. (1997). “How user perceptions influence software use,” IEEE Transactions, July/August, 58-65.
  12. Ndubisi, N.O., Jantan, M. & Richardson, S. (2001). “Is the technology acceptance model valid for entrepreneurs? Model testing and examining usage determinants,” Asian Academy of Management Journal, 6:2, 31-54.
  13. Segars, A.H. & Grover, V. (1993). “Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis,” MIS Quarterly, 517-525.
  14. Sheth, J.N., Newman, B.I., & Gross, B.I. (1991). “Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values,” Journal of Business Research in Market