SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

The Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (TAQ): A Study of Validity and Reliability in Turkish

Zehra Aydoğan(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-4185-0063
Sevgi Kutlu(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-2175-5280
Emre Ocak(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ, CERRAHİ TIP BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, KULAK, BURUN, BOĞAZ HASTALIKLARI ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0003-0652-2777
Suna Tokgoz Yilmaz(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SAĞLIK BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4656-099X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The TAQ has demonstrated internal consistency and construct validity for assessing tinnitus acceptability in the Turkish adult population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To create a Turkish version of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (TAQ) and to examine its reliability and validity in an adult population.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: A total of 92 individuals (56 females, 36 males) with a mean age of 47.59±13.58 years and a diagnosis of tinnitus were included in this validation study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The TAQ has demonstrated internal consistency and construct validity for assessing tinnitus acceptability in the Turkish adult population.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:tinnitus · inventory · reliability

Abstract

Objective: To create a Turkish version of the Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (TAQ) and to examine its reliability and validity in an adult population. Method: A total of 92 individuals (56 females, 36 males) with a mean age of 47.59±13.58 years and a diagnosis of tinnitus were included in this validation study. The subjects completed the Turkish version of the TAQ. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), which has Turkish validity and reliability, was also completed. Internal consistency and reliability of the Turkish version were assessed using Cronbach's alpha. In 24 individuals, test-retest reliability was assessed. Intraclass correlation (95% confidence interval), Spearman correlation, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient were used for test-retest reliability and internal consistency. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05. Number (n), frequency (%), arithmetic mean, standard deviation, median, percentage 75, and percentage 25 were used to evaluate the data. Results: In the reliability analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficients of Factor 1, Factor 2, and Factor 3 for TAQ were 0.84, 0.74, and 0.65, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total scale is 0.71. The model fit criteria indicate a good fit to the structure (RMSEA<0.08, CMIN/DF<3, GFI, AGFI, NFI>0.80, and CFI>0.90). Conclusion: The TAQ has demonstrated internal consistency and construct validity for assessing tinnitus acceptability in the Turkish adult population.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aydoğan, Z., Kutlu, S., Ocak, E., Yilmaz, S. T. (2025). The Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (TAQ): A Study of Validity and Reliability in Turkish. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.1522382

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Aksoy, S., Firat, Y., & Alpar, R. (2007). The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: a study of validity and reliability. International tinnitus journal, 13(2), 94.PMID: 18229787.
  2. Baguley, D., McFerran, D., & Hall, D. (2013). Tinnitus. The Lancet, 382(9904), 1600-1607. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60142-7.
  3. Fackrell, K., Hall, D. A., Barry, J. G., & Hoare, D. J. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population. Hearing research, 335, 220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009.
  4. Hallam, R. S., McKenna, L., & Shurlock, L. (2004). Tinnitus impairs cognitive efficiency. International journal of audiology, 43(4), 218-226. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050030.
  5. Ivansic, D., Besteher, B., Gantner, J., Guntinas-Lichius, O., Pantev, C., Nenadic, I., & Dobel, C. (2019). Psychometric assessment of mental health in tinnitus patients, depressive and healthy controls. Psychiatry research, 281, 112582. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112582.
  6. Langguth, B., Landgrebe, M., Kleinjung, T., Sand, G. P., & Hajak, G. (2011). Tinnitus and depression. The world journal of biological psychiatry, 12(7), 489-500. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.575178.
  7. McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107(1-2), 159-166. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012.
  8. Meikle, M. B., Stewart, B. J., Griest, S. E., & Henry, J. A. (2008). Tinnitus outcomes assessment. Trends in Amplification, 12(3), 223-235. doi: 10.1177/1084713808319943.
  9. Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C. A., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., De Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2019). COSMIN Study Design checklist for Patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019, 1-32.
  10. Murphy, C. E. (2012). The effect of social support on quality of life for tinnitus sufferers. The international tinnitus journal, 17(2), 173-179. doi: 10.5935/0946-5448.20120031.
  11. Newman, C. W., Jacobson, G. P., & Spitzer, J. B. (1996). Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 122(2), 143-148. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007.
  12. Nondahl, D. M., Cruickshanks, K. J., Dalton, D. S., Klein, B. E., Klein, R., Schubert, C. R.,. & Wiley, T. L. (2007). The impact of tinnitus on quality of life in older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18(03), 257-266.
  13. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. (1978). The role of university in the development of entrepreneurial vocations: A Spanish study. Psychometric theory, 387-405
  14. Roland, L. T., Lenze, E. J., Hardin, F. M., Kallogjeri, D., Nicklaus, J., Wineland, A. M.,. & Piccirillo, J. F. (2015). Effects of mindfulness based stress reduction therapy on subjective bother and neural connectivity in chronic tinnitus. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 152(5), 919-926. doi: 10.1177/0194599815571556.
  15. Shekhawat, G. S., Searchfield, G. D., Kobayashi, K., & Stinear, C. M. (2013). Prescription of hearing-aid output for tinnitus relief. International journal of audiology, 52(9), 617-625. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.799787.
  16. Takabatake, S., Takahashi, M., Kabaya, K., Sekiya, Y., Sekiya, K., Harata, I.,. & Akechi, T. (2022). Validation of the tinnitus acceptance questionnaire: Japanese version. Audiology research, 12(1), 66-76. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12010006.
  17. Weise, C., Kleinstäuber, M., Hesser, H., Westin, V. Z., & Andersson, G. (2013). Acceptance of tinnitus: validation of the tinnitus acceptance questionnaire. Cognitive behaviour therapy, 42(2), 100-115. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2013.781670.
  18. Newman, C. W., Jacobson, G. P., & Spitzer, J. B. (1996). Development of the tinnitus handicap inventory. Archives of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 122(2), 143-148. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007.
  19. Nondahl, D. M., Cruickshanks, K. J., Dalton, D. S., Klein, B. E., Klein, R., Schubert, C. R.,. & Wiley, T. L. (2007). The impact of tinnitus on quality of life in older adults. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 18(03), 257-266.
  20. Roland, L. T., Lenze, E. J., Hardin, F. M., Kallogjeri, D., Nicklaus, J., Wineland, A. M.,. & Piccirillo, J. F. (2015). Effects of mindfulness based stress reduction therapy on subjective bother and neural connectivity in chronic tinnitus. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, 152(5), 919-926. doi: 10.1177/0194599815571556.
  21. Takabatake, S., Takahashi, M., Kabaya, K., Sekiya, Y., Sekiya, K., Harata, I.,. & Akechi, T. (2022). Validation of the tinnitus acceptance questionnaire: Japanese version. Audiology research, 12(1), 66-76. doi: 10.3390/audiolres12010006.