Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2026 / Volume: 55 Issue: 4

A logistic-transform model on the unit interval: Distributional properties and likelihood-based inference

Arshid Khan(Kohat University of Science and Technology)0009-0001-6199-4307
Abdus Saboor(Kohat University of Science and Technology)0000-0002-8330-9489
Farrukh Jamal(Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk)0000-0001-6192-9890
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed unit-interval construction is presented as an analytically transparent and computationally convenient approach for bounded-response modeling, while avoiding claims of a new inferential mechanism beyond the underlying logistic transformation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We investigate a logistic-transform model on the unit interval, denoted by NULog, obtained by applying the inverse-logit transformation to a logistic location-scale random variable.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Specifically, letting $Z \sim \mathrm{Logistic}(\mu, s)$ with $(\mu, s) \in \mathbb{R} \times (0, \infty)$ and defining $X = (1 + e^{-Z})^{-1}$ yields a tractable transformation-based model on $(0, 1)$ rather than a fundamentally new stochastic family.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed unit-interval construction is presented as an analytically transparent and computationally convenient approach for bounded-response modeling, while avoiding claims of a new inferential mechanism beyond the underlying logistic transformation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fisher information · hazard rate · likelihood equivalence

Abstract

We investigate a logistic-transform model on the unit interval, denoted by NULog, obtained by applying the inverse-logit transformation to a logistic location-scale random variable. Specifically, letting $Z \sim \mathrm{Logistic}(\mu, s)$ with $(\mu, s) \in \mathbb{R} \times (0, \infty)$ and defining $X = (1 + e^{-Z})^{-1}$ yields a tractable transformation-based model on $(0, 1)$ rather than a fundamentally new stochastic family. We establish boundary and tail asymptotics, stochastic ordering properties, and explicit representations of the hazard rate together with analytically justified shape transitions. A central structural result shows that likelihood-based inference for $(\mu, s)$ under the unit-interval representation is exactly equivalent, up to a parameter-free Jacobian term, to inference under the classical logistic location--scale family applied to the logit-transformed observations. This equivalence yields explicit score equations, diagonal Fisher information, and standard asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimators. Finite-sample performance is examined through Monte Carlo experiments. We further develop a quantile-regression extension based on the closed-form quantile representation, and illustrate the practical behavior of the model using real datasets with standard goodness-of-fit criteria and graphical diagnostics. The proposed unit-interval construction is presented as an analytically transparent and computationally convenient approach for bounded-response modeling, while avoiding claims of a new inferential mechanism beyond the underlying logistic transformation.

🔖

Cite This Article

Khan, A., Saboor, A., Jamal, F. (2026). A logistic-transform model on the unit interval: Distributional properties and likelihood-based inference. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Volume: 55 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1850239

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. H.S. Bakouch, T. Hussain, M. Tosic, V.S. Stojanovi and N. Qarmalah, Unit exponential probability distribution: Characterization and applications in environmental and engineering data modeling, Mathematics 11 (19), 4207, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11194207
  2. N.L. Johnson, Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation, Biometrika 36 (1–2), 149–176, 1949. https://doi.org/10.2307/2332539
  3. A.K. Gupta and S. Nadarajah, Handbook of Beta Distribution and Its Applications, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, 2004.
  4. M.S. Khan, R. King and I.L. Hudson, Transmuted Kumaraswamy distribution, Stat. Transition New Ser. 17 (2), 183–210, 2016.
  5. M.Ç. Korkmaz, A new heavy-tailed distribution defined on the bounded interval: The logit slash distribution and its application, J. Appl. Stat. 47 (12), 2097–2119, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1670595
  6. P. Kumaraswamy, A generalized probability density function for double-bounded random processes, J. Hydrol. 46 (1–2), 79–88, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 1694(80)90036-0
  7. J. Mazucheli, M.Ç. Korkmaz, A.F.B. Menezes and L.B. Fernandes, The unit generalized half-normal quantile regression model: Formulation, estimation, diagnostics, and numerical applications, Soft Comput. 27, 279–295, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07420-2
  8. J. Mazucheli, A.F.B. Menezes, L.B. Fernandes, R.P. de Oliveira and M.E. Ghitany, The unit-Weibull distribution as an alternative to the Kumaraswamy distribution for modeling of quantiles conditional on covariates, J. Appl. Stat. 47 (6), 954–974, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1589172
  9. E. Mahmoudi and A.A. Jafari, Generalized Lindley distributions with applications, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 82 (9), 1351–1366, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2011.562504
  10. A.M. Mathai, R.K. Saxena and H.J. Haubold, The H-Function: Theory and Applications, Springer, New York, 2010.
  11. R. Pouso, S. Nadarajah and M.H. Tahir, General results for the Kumaraswamy-G distribution, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 91 (5), 951–979, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2020.1831274
  12. Q. Shao, A new distribution: the exponential Burr XII distribution, Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 33 (9), 2299–2311, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1081/STA-200026568
  13. J. Swain, V. Sekhar and R.W. James, Least-squares estimation of distribution functions in Johnson’s translation system, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 29 (4), 271–297, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949658808811068
  14. W. Weibull, A statistical distribution function of wide applicability, J. Appl. Mech. 18 (3), 293–297, 1951. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4010337
  15. C. Chesneau and F. Jamal, Some new facts about the unit-Rayleigh distribution with applications, Mathematics 8 (11), 1954, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8111954
  16. A. Saeed, I. Elbatal, A. Saboor, F. Jamal, S. Khan and A.B. Ghorbal, Novel parameters based trigonometric probability distribution having bathtub shape with bounded support, J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci. 18 (2), 101443, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2025.101443