Journals / Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics / 2026 / Volume: 55 Issue: 4

Robust adaptive EWMA–CUSUM control charts for monitoring autocorrelated and non-normal processes

Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-08-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed RAEC chart consistently achieves shorter out-of-control average run lengths than conventional EWMA, CUSUM, and existing hybrid monitoring schemes, particularly for small and moderate process shifts, while maintaining satisfactory in-control performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Control charts are widely used for monitoring process stability; however, their performance deteriorates when observations exhibit both autocorrelation and non-normality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study proposes a Robust Adaptive EWMA–CUSUM (RAEC) control chart that integrates robust location and scale estimation with an adaptive EWMA–CUSUM model in which the shift estimate is updated dynamically according to recent process behavior, thereby improving responsiveness to evolving process changes while maintaining robustness to outliers and distributional departures from normality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed RAEC chart consistently achieves shorter out-of-control average run lengths than conventional EWMA, CUSUM, and existing hybrid monitoring schemes, particularly for small and moderate process shifts, while maintaining satisfactory in-control performance.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adaptive control charts · autocorrelated processes · CUSUM

Abstract

Control charts are widely used for monitoring process stability; however, their performance deteriorates when observations exhibit both autocorrelation and non-normality. This study proposes a Robust Adaptive EWMA–CUSUM (RAEC) control chart that integrates robust location and scale estimation with an adaptive EWMA–CUSUM model in which the shift estimate is updated dynamically according to recent process behavior, thereby improving responsiveness to evolving process changes while maintaining robustness to outliers and distributional departures from normality. The performance of the proposed chart was evaluated through extensive Monte Carlo simulations under normal, heavy-tailed Student’s (t), skewed lognormal, and contaminated distributions, and was illustrated using 130 daily observations of the Kenya shilling overnight interbank average benchmark interest rate. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed RAEC chart consistently achieves shorter out-of-control average run lengths than conventional EWMA, CUSUM, and existing hybrid monitoring schemes, particularly for small and moderate process shifts, while maintaining satisfactory in-control performance. The real-data application further illustrates the proposed method’s ability to identify emerging structural changes in an autocorrelated financial process. Although the empirical illustration is based on a single financial time series, the proposed framework provides a flexible and robust monitoring strategy that can be extended to a broader range of industrial, financial, and environmental applications, with future validation on larger and more diverse datasets.

🔖

Cite This Article

Wanyonyi, M., Gogo, J. (2026). Robust adaptive EWMA–CUSUM control charts for monitoring autocorrelated and non-normal processes. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Volume: 55 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1913358

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Z. Jalilibal, A. Amiri and M. B. C. Khoo, A literature review on joint control schemes in statistical process monitoring, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 38 (6), 3270—3289, 2022.
  2. D. R. Prajapati and S. Singh, Control charts for monitoring the autocorrelated process parameters: a literature review, Int. J. Prod. Qual. Manag. 10 (2), 207–249, 2012.
  3. M. Abid, H. Z. Nazir, M. Riaz, and Z. Lin, In-control robustness comparison of different control charts, Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 40 (13), 3860–3871, 2018.
  4. I. S. Triantafyllou and M. Ram, Nonparametric EWMA-type control charts for monitoring industrial processes: An Overview, Int. J. Math. Eng. Manag. Sci. 6 (3), 708, 2021.
  5. C. da Cunha Alves, A. C. Konrath, E. Henning, O. M. F. C. Walter, E. P. Paladini, T. A. Oliveira and A. Oliveira, The Mixed CUSUM-EWMA (MCE) control chart as a new alternative in the monitoring of a manufacturing process, Braz. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 16 (1), 1—13, 2019.
  6. A. M. Chaudhary, A. Sanaullah, M. Hanif, M. M. A. Almazah, N. A. Albasheir and F. S. Al-Duais, Efficient monitoring of a parameter of non-normal process using a robust efficient control chart: A comparative study, Mathematics 11 (19), 4157, 2023.
  7. R. Osei-Aning, S. A. Abbasi and M. Riaz, Monitoring of serially correlated processes using residual control charts, Sci. Iran. 24 (3), 1603—1614, 2017.
  8. S. Jafarian-Namin, M. S. Fallah Nezhad, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam and A. Salmasnia, Robust design of ARMA and ACC charts for imperfect and autocorrelated processes under uncertainty, J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 94 (4), 762—786, 2024.
  9. N. Saeed, A. A.-A. M. F. Bataineh, M. O. A. Abu-Shawiesh and F. Haddad, Sensitivity and reliability comparisons of EWMA mean control chart based on robust scale estimators under non-normal process: COVID data application, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 40 (8), 4513—4529, 2024.
  10. A. Imtiaz, N. Khan, M. Saleem and M. Aslam, Development and application of a modified EWMA control chart for early detection of process shifts in skewed distributions, J. Chin. Inst. Eng. 48 (5), 680-–690, 2025.
  11. L. Xue, Q. Wang, Z. He and P. Qiu, A nonparametric EWMA control chart for monitoring mixed continuous and count data, Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 21 (5), 749-–765, 2024.
  12. Y.-C. Lin, C.-Y. Chou and C.-H. Chen, Robustness of the EWMA median control chart to non-normality, Int. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 25 (1), 35—58, 2017.
  13. H. Z. Nazir, T. Hussain, N. Akhtar, M. Abid and M. Riaz, Robust adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control charts with applications of manufacturing processes, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 105 (1), 733—748, 2019.
  14. H. AlQadi, A. Safeer, M. Alquraish and H. M. Aljohani, Outlier-Resistant Process Monitoring Using a RCV-Based EWMA Control Chart, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 42 (3), 1149-–1158, 2026.
  15. S. Sukparungsee, A. Kaewphengkro, C. Chantarapap and T. Maneerat, To Improve Sensitivity and Resilience to Change Tracking for Novel Distribution-Free Extended EWMA Control Chart, Thailand Stat. 24 (2), 443—461, 2026.
  16. K.-J.Wang and L. J. Asrini, Multivariate auto-correlated process control by a residualbased mixed CUSUM-EWMA model, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 39 (4), 1120-–1142, 2023.
  17. R. Osei-Aning, S. A. Abbasi and M. Riaz, Mixed EWMA-CUSUM and mixed CUSUM-EWMA modified control charts for monitoring first order autoregressive processes, Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 14 (4), 429-–453, 2017.
  18. W. T. Sheu, S. H. Lu and Y. L. Hsu, The Generally Weighted Moving Average Control Chart for Monitoring the Process Mean of Autocorrelated Observations, Ann. Oper. Res. 349 (1), 139-–167, 2025.
  19. Z. Wang and Y. Li, Construction and application of AEWMA control chart for autocorrelation process, in Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Computational Modeling, Simulation and Data Analysis, pp. 449-–456, 2024.
  20. M. A. Sarwar, M. Noor-ul-Amin, I. Khan, E. A. Ismail, W. Sumelka and M. Nabi, A Weibull process monitoring with AEWMA control chart: an application to breaking strength of the fibrous composite, Sci. Rep. 13 (1), 19873, 2023.
  21. Y. Supharakonsakun, Y. Areepong and K. Silpakob, Explicit ARL Computational for a Modified EWMA Control Chart in Autocorrelated Statistical Process Control Models, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 145 (1), 2025.
  22. A. A. H. Ahmadini, I. Khan, A. O. Alshammari, H. AlQadi and W. Sumelka, Adaptive VSS-EWMA Control Chart for Monitoring the Process Dispersion, Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 21795, 2025.
  23. M. W. Kazmi and M. Noor-ul-Amin, Artificial Neural Network-Based Adaptive Cumulative Sum Control Chart for Process Monitoring, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int., 2026.
  24. J. Neammai, Y. Areepong and S. Sukparungsee, An Advanced Quality Control Approach: Integrating Quadruple EWMA Strategy for Enhanced Sensitivity in Process Monitoring, Mathematics 14 (11), 1917, 2026.
  25. L. Zulfa, M. Ahsan and M. Mashuri, Adaptive Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Max Multivariate Control Chart for Simultaneous Monitoring of Process Mean and Variability, in 2025 International Conference on Data Science and Its Applications (ICoDSA), pp. 1172-–1177, 2025.
  26. I. A. Nafisah, M. M. A. Almazah, A. Y. Al-Rezami, and S. Hussain, Variable sample size based EWMA control chart with an exponential scaling mechanism for production process monitoring, Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 30964, 2025.
  27. B. Liu, M. Noor-ul-Amin, I. Khan, E. A. Ismail and F. A. Awwad, Integration of Bayesian adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart and paired ranked-based sampling for enhanced semiconductor manufacturing process monitoring, Processes 11 (10), 2893, 2023.
  28. Z. Abbas, T. Abbas, H. Z. Nazir and M. Riaz, A novel adaptive CUSUM system for efficient process mean monitoring: An application in piston ring manufacturing process, Alex. Eng. J. 106, 87-–100, 2024.
  29. W. Peerajit, An integral equation approach for average run length of incorporation of exogenous variable in seasonal autoregressive fractionally integrated model, AIP Conf. Proc. 3084 (1), 030002, 2024.
  30. Y. Areepong and W. Peerajit, Integral equation solutions for the average run length for monitoring shifts in the mean of a generalized seasonal $ARFIMAX(P, D, Q, r)s$ process running on a CUSUM control chart, PLoS ONE 17(2):e0264283, 2022.