Furthermore, academic achievement and gender were not the strong determiners in e-learning compared with face to face learning.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This purpose of this study was to understand e-learners and face to face learners’ views towards learning English through e-learning in vocational higher school context and to determine the role of academic achievement and gender in e-learning and face to face learning.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was conducted at a state-run university in 2012-2013 academic year and subjects were 221 students from two different Vocational Higher Schools taking up English course through e-learning and traditional learning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Furthermore, academic achievement and gender were not the strong determiners in e-learning compared with face to face learning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012-2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Face To Face Or E-Learning · E-Learning In Language Teaching · E-Language Learning.
Abstract
This purpose of this study was to understand e-learners and face to face learners’ views towards learning English through e-learning in vocational higher school context and to determine the role of academic achievement and gender in e-learning and face to face learning. This study was conducted at a state-run university in 2012-2013 academic year and subjects were 221 students from two different Vocational Higher Schools taking up English course through e-learning and traditional learning. The results of the study revealed that there was no significant difference between e-learners and face to face learners about the views towards learning English via e-learning. Furthermore, academic achievement and gender were not the strong determiners in e-learning compared with face to face learning.
SOLAK, E., CAKIR, R. (2014). Face To Face Or E-Learningin Turkish Efl Context. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 37–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/140165
Bencheva, N. (2010). Learning Styles and E-Learning Face-to-Face to the Traditional Learning. Научни Трудове На Русенския Университеt, 49, 63-67. Retrieved from http://conf.ru.acad.bg/bg/docs/cp10/3.2/3.2-11.pdf
Cantoni V., Cellario M. & Porta M. (2004). Perspectives and challenges in e-learning: Towards natural interaction paradigms. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing. 15: 333-345.
Caspi A., Chajut E. & Saporta, K. (2008). Participation in class and in online discussions: Gender differences. Computers & Education 50, 3,718–724 Castaño-Muñoz, J., Duart, M., J., & Sancho-Vinuesa, T. (2013). The Internet in face- toface higher education: Can interactive learning improve academic achievement? BritishJournal of Educational Technology. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12007
Dillon, C. L., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). A framework for the evaluation of telecommunications-based distance education. Paper presented at the 17th World Conference for Distance Education, Birmingham, UK. Fahad, F. (2010). The Learners’ satisfaction toward online e-learning implemented in the college of applied studies and community service: Can e-learning replace the conventional system of education? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education TOJDE 1302-6488 Volume: 11 Number: 2 Article 2. Fuller, A, Awyzio, G. & McFarlane, P. (2001). Using WebCT to support team teaching Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 315-3
Junco, R. & Mastrodicasa, J. (2007). Connecting to the Net.Generation: What higher education professionals need to know about today’s students. Washington, DC: NASPA. Hofmann, J. (2002). Peer-To-Peer: The Next Hot Trend in E-Learning? ASTD Learning Circuits [on-line]. http://www.learningcircuits.org/2002/jan2002/hofmann.html
Kocoglu, Z., Ozek, Y. & Kesli, Y. (2011). Blended learning: Investigating its potential in an English language teacher training program Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1124-1134.
Ladyshewsky, R. K. (2003). E-learning compared with face to face: Differences in the academic achievement of postgraduate business students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 20(3), 316-336.
Larson, D., & Sung, C. (2009). Comparing student performance: Online