Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

Seeing Google through the Eyes of Turkish Academicians

Pages
105–119
Publication Date
2017-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results offer important insights about the academicians' perceptions of Google and how and why they make use of Google products.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With its new variety of IT products and services created in the last decade for students, teachers and schools, Google has changed the face of education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Google technologies that can be used completely free of charge via a single account in any device offer innovative alternatives to meet the needs of education.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results offer important insights about the academicians' perceptions of Google and how and why they make use of Google products.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Google · Google services · academician

Abstract

With its new variety of IT products and services created in the last decade for students, teachers and schools, Google has changed the face of education. Google technologies that can be used completely free of charge via a single account in any device offer innovative alternatives to meet the needs of education. These technologies also help continuously improve digital competencies of students and teachers. On the other hand, criticisms against the monopolization of the company as well as its privacy and transparency policies have been increasing. In the light of these developments, the current study aims to examine academicians’ metaphorical perceptions related to Google. The study was designed based on metaphorical analysis as a method of qualitative research. The study group was comprised of academicians working at education faculties of four state universities located in the middle west of Turkey. The data were collected through a closed web-based questionnaire consisting of open-ended questions. Results revealed that large majority of the academicians have a positive perception of Google. A group of participants also views it as a threat. Results offer important insights about the academicians' perceptions of Google and how and why they make use of Google products.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAKURT, T., BARDAKCI, S. (2017). Seeing Google through the Eyes of Turkish Academicians. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 105–119. https://ajindex.com/articles/139891

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Armenteros, M., Liaw, S.-S., Fernandez, M., Diaz, R. F., & Sanchez, R. A. (2013). Surveying FIFA instructors' behavioral intention toward the Multimedia Teaching Materials. Computers & Education, 61, 91-104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu. 2012.09.010 117 117 Bailey, J. J. (2000). Students as clients in a professional/client relationship. Journal of Management Education, 24(3), 353-365. doi: 10.1177/105256290002400306 BBC (2015, April 15). EU set to announce Google action. Retrieved June 10, 2015, from http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32307096
  2. Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox. Capar, G., & K. Tarim (2015). Efficacy of the cooperative learning method on mathematics achievement and attitude: A meta-analysis research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 15(2): 553-559. doi:10.12738/estp.2015.2.2098
  3. Cardozo, N., Opsahl, K., & Reitman, R. (2015). Who has your back? Online service providers’ privacy and transparency practices regarding government access to user data. Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved July 12, 2015, from https://www.eff.org/files/2015/06/18/who_has_your_back_2015_protecting_ your_data_from_government_requests_20150618.pdf. Cigdem, H., & Topcu, A. (2015). Predictors of instructors’ behavioral intention to use learning management system: A Turkish vocational college example. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 22-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.049
  4. Collins, E. C., & Green, J. L. (1990). Metaphors: The construction of a perspective. Theory into practice, 29(2), 71-77. doi:10.1080/00405849009543435 Cross, J. (2003). Informal learning - the other 80%. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://www.internettime.com/Learning/The%20Other%2080%25.htm.
  5. Coklar, A.N., & Bagci, H. (2010). What are the roles of prospective teachers on the educational technology use: A metaphor study. World Journal on Educational Technology, 2(3), 186-195
  6. Coklar, A.N., Vural, L., & Yuksel, I. (2010). Computer metaphors developed by the last year students of department of computer education and instructional technology, and department of computer engineering. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 3(1), 1-28
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  8. Dillenbourg P. (1999) What do you mean by collaborative learning?. In P. Dillen