Journals / Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 11 Issue: 3

High Efficiency Dust Removal Prototype for Tissue Paper Conversion Lines

Cem Sarı(ICM MAKINA VE MUHENDISLIK LTD STI)0000-0001-7277-1021
Ali Kibar(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ASIM KOCABIYIK MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, MAKİNE VE METAL TEKNOLOJİLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, MAKİNE PR.)0000-0002-2310-1088
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show an 86.6% reduction in airborne dust (from 783 to 105 µg/m³), and a weight loss of 1.41 g per 100-unit pack due to dust removal.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study introduces an innovative prototype designed to mitigate dust emissions in tissue paper manufacturing, addressing key challenges in product quality, worker health, and environmental sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The system integrates static charge neutralization, mechanical vibration, and vacuum extraction to effectively capture airborne particles.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show an 86.6% reduction in airborne dust (from 783 to 105 µg/m³), and a weight loss of 1.41 g per 100-unit pack due to dust removal.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tissue paper manufacturing · particulate matter control · electrostatic neutralization

Abstract

This study introduces an innovative prototype designed to mitigate dust emissions in tissue paper manufacturing, addressing key challenges in product quality, worker health, and environmental sustainability. The system integrates static charge neutralization, mechanical vibration, and vacuum extraction to effectively capture airborne particles. Experimental validation was performed in a controlled 55 m³ environment (4 × 4.3 × 3.2 m) with a line speed of 250 m/min and a web width of 350 mm. Comparative trials under active and inactive conditions utilized a laser particle sensor and precision balance to quantify ambient dust concentrations and product mass variations. Results show an 86.6% reduction in airborne dust (from 783 to 105 µg/m³), and a weight loss of 1.41 g per 100-unit pack due to dust removal. Over an 8-hour shift, a total of 418.7 g of dust is extracted from the tissue—93.7 g captured in the filter and 325 g in the cyclone. These findings highlight improvements in production hygiene, reduced respiratory risks for workers, and enhanced sustainability through waste minimization. The prototype facilitates compliance with occupational health and safety standards and demonstrates scalability across various tissue production lines, including recycled and virgin fibre applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

Sarı, C., Kibar, A. (2025). High Efficiency Dust Removal Prototype for Tissue Paper Conversion Lines. Gazi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 11 Issue: 3. https://ajindex.com/articles/1397351

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. T. De Assis, J. Pawlak, L. Pal, H. Jameel, R. Venditti et al., and W. Gonzalez, “Comparison of wood and non-wood market pulps for tissue paper application,” Bioresources, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 6781–6810, 2019.
  2. J. C. Vieira, P. T. Fiadeiro, and A. P. Costa, “Converting operations impact on tissue paper product properties – a review,” Bioresources, vol. 18, no. 1, 2023. doi: 10.15376/BIORES.18.1.VIEIRA
  3. R. Frazier, “Methods of dust assessment and control in the paper industry and a proposed methodology for evaluation of dust in hygiene tissue papers,” Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., North Carolina, USA, 2022.
  4. “Tissue & Hygiene Paper - Worldwide | Market Forecast,” Statista.com, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/tissue-hygiene-paper/worldwide. [Accessed: Jul. 10, 2025].
  5. C. Campbell, T. De Assis, L. Pawlowska, and C. Nurse, “Kemira’s new generation field test dust and lint particle analyser,” Tissue World Magazine, no. 4, pp. 25-26, July/August 2020.
  6. R. P. Linder, G.S. Furman, R.M. Lowe, D. Castro, R. Anthony et al., and M.A. Billings, “Tissue dust reduction,” US Patent 10648133B2, May 15, 2017.
  7. R. Wathén, “Studies on fiber strength and its effect on paper properties,” Ph.D. dissertation, Aalto Univ. School of Chemical Engineering, Finland, 2006.
  8. E. Andersson, G. Sällsten, S. Lohman, R. Neitzel, and K. Torén, “Lung function and paper dust exposure among workers in a soft tissue paper mill,” Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 105–110, Jan. 2020. doi: 10.1007/S00420-019-01469-6
  9. J. E. Bradbury, D. Ziegelman, J. E. Sealey, and B. T. Miller, “Process for reducing lint from tissue and towel products,” WO Patent 2018200460A1, Apr. 24, 2018.
  10. A. de O. Mendes, J.C. Vieira, A.M. Carta, J.M.R. Curto, M.E. Amaral et al., and P.T. Fiadeiro, “Tissue paper softness: A comparison between different experimental assessment approaches,” Materials, vol. 18, no. 2, p. 228, Jan. 2025. doi: 10.3390/MA18020228
  11. A. Tafese, A. Kumie, B.E. Moen, T. Abegaz, W. Derssa et al., and M. Bratveit “Respiratory symptoms and paper dust exposure among workers in the paper industry in Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 21, no. 10, p. 1331, Oct. 2024. doi: 10.3390/IJERPH21101331
  12. Z. Ceylan and Ş. D. Aydın, “Green production—clean technology and eco-efficiency keys for sustainability,” PEN Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 347–358, 2021. doi: 10.21533/pen.v9.i2.743
  13. E. Hassan, W. Abou-Elseoud, S. El-Mekkawi, and M. Hassan, “Saccharification of paper sludge and fiber dust wastes from the tissue paper industry by Maximyze® enzymes,” J. Renew. Mater., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1169–1187, Jun. 2025. doi: 10.32604/JRM.2025.02024-0030
  14. A. C. Dias, R. Carvalho, C. Marques, R. Bértolo, A. Carta, and L. Machado, “Environmental sustainability assessment of tissue paper production,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 21, p. 9419, Oct. 2024. doi: 10.3390/SU16219419
  15. A. R. Noyon, S. Kerim, A. Rouf, M. Jarmal, R.K. Layek et al., and E. Uddin, “Fabrication of biodegradable kraft paper from buffing dust and jute fiber: Green solutions for packaging,” Polym. Eng. Sci., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 4032–4042, Dec. 2023. doi: 10.1002/PEN.26503
  16. A. Balea, N. Merayo, E. Fuente, C. Negro, M. Delgado-Agulilar et al., and A. Blanco, “Cellulose nanofibers from residues to improve linting and mechanical properties of recycled paper,” Cellulose, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1339–1351, Feb. 2018. doi: 10.1007/s10570-017-1618-x
  17. J. J. Pawlak, R. Frazier, R. E. Vera, Y. Wang, and R. Gonzalez, “Review: The softness of hygiene tissue,” Bioresources, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 3509–3550, 2022. doi: 10.15376/BIORES.17.2.PAWLAK
  18. C. Sarı, B. Kesmen, A. Kibar, “Cooling of the rubber embossing cylinder for tissue paper,” Gazi Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 172–182, 2024. doi:10.30855/gmbd.0705N14
  19. R. Frazier, F. Zambrano, J. J. Pawlak, and R. Gonzalez, “Methods to assess and control dusting and linting in the paper industry: a review,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 119, no. 9–10, pp. 5511–5528, Apr. 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00170-021-08482-5
  20. R. Frazier, F. Zambrano, J. J. Pawlak, I. Peszlen, D. Welsford, and R. Gonzalez, “The tissue dust analysis system: a new device and methodology to quantify dusting and linting propensity in hygiene tissue papers,” Cellulose, pp. 8387–8407, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10570-022-04779-0
  21. J. Lunewski and E. Schmidt, “Experimental investigation into paper dust formation during knife edge cutting on a laboratory scale,” Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 59–72, Mar. 2023. doi: 10.1515/npprj-2022-0070
  22. S. J. Kline and F. A. McClintock, “Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments,” Mechanical Engineering, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 1953.
  23. D. Xiao, S. Zhao, D. Xiao, and S. Zhao, “Electrostatics—Fundamentals and modern applications,” Electrostatics—Fundamentals and Modern Applications, Apr. 2025. doi: 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.111059