SavedAdd your journal

Journals / EMO Bilimsel Dergi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3

A Hybrid Stochastic-Robust Optimization Framework for Industrial Energy Management under Renewable Generation and Price Uncertainty

Yenilenebilir Enerji Üretimi ve Fiyat Belirsizliği Altında Endüstriyel Enerji Yönetimi için Hibrit Stokastik-Sağlam Optimizasyon Çerçevesi

Erhan Baran(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5897-8680
Pages
37–48
Publication Date
2026-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings highlight the potential of hybrid optimization strategies for reliable and sustainable industrial energy management.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The increasing penetration of renewable energy resources in industrial microgrids has introduced significant operational uncertainties, particularly due to photovoltaic (PV) generation variability and electricity price fluctuations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These uncertainties complicate energy management decisions and may lead to inefficient scheduling and increased operational risks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings highlight the potential of hybrid optimization strategies for reliable and sustainable industrial energy management.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hibrit optimizasyonu · Enerji yönetimi · PV belirsizliği

Abstract

The increasing penetration of renewable energy resources in industrial microgrids has introduced significant operational uncertainties, particularly due to photovoltaic (PV) generation variability and electricity price fluctuations. These uncertainties complicate energy management decisions and may lead to inefficient scheduling and increased operational risks. To address this challenge, this study proposes a hybrid stochastic–robust optimization framework for industrial energy management systems. The proposed model integrates scenario-based stochastic programming with robust optimization to simultaneously capture expected system performance and protection against worst-case deviations. A two-stage decision structure is developed in which day-ahead scheduling decisions are determined under stochastic scenarios, while real-time adjustments are safeguarded through a robust uncertainty set. The model also incorporates battery energy storage dynamics and carbon emission costs to reflect environmental considerations in industrial energy planning. A case study based on a grid-connected industrial microgrid with PV generation and battery storage is conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Comparative results with deterministic, stochastic, and robust models demonstrate that the hybrid model achieves improved cost stability, enhanced resilience to uncertainty, and better renewable energy utilization. The findings highlight the potential of hybrid optimization strategies for reliable and sustainable industrial energy management.

Özet

Endüstriyel mikro şebekelerde yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının artan yaygınlığı, özellikle fotovoltaik (PV) üretim değişkenliği ve elektrik fiyat dalgalanmaları nedeniyle önemli operasyonel belirsizlikler ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu belirsizlikler, enerji yönetimi kararlarını karmaşıklaştırır ve verimsiz planlamaya ve artan operasyonel risklere yol açabilir. Bu zorluğun üstesinden gelmek için, bu çalışma endüstriyel enerji yönetim sistemleri için hibrit bir stokastik-sağlam optimizasyon çerçevesi önermektedir. Önerilen model, beklenen sistem performansını ve en kötü durum sapmalarına karşı korumayı aynı anda yakalamak için senaryo tabanlı stokastik programlamayı sağlam optimizasyonla entegre eder. Günlük planlama kararlarının stokastik senaryolar altında belirlendiği, gerçek zamanlı ayarlamaların ise sağlam bir belirsizlik kümesi aracılığıyla güvence altına alındığı iki aşamalı bir karar yapısı geliştirilmiştir. Model ayrıca, endüstriyel enerji planlamasında çevresel hususları yansıtmak için batarya enerji depolama dinamiklerini ve karbon emisyon maliyetlerini de içermektedir. Önerilen yaklaşımın etkinliğini değerlendirmek için PV üretimi ve batarya depolaması bulunan şebekeye bağlı bir endüstriyel mikro şebekeye dayalı bir vaka çalışması yapılmıştır. Deterministik, stokastik ve sağlam modellerle yapılan karşılaştırmalı sonuçlar, hibrit modelin daha iyi maliyet istikrarı, belirsizliğe karşı daha yüksek direnç ve daha iyi yenilenebilir enerji kullanımı sağladığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, güvenilir ve sürdürülebilir endüstriyel enerji yönetimi için hibrit optimizasyon stratejilerinin potansiyelini vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Baran, E. (2026). A Hybrid Stochastic-Robust Optimization Framework for Industrial Energy Management under Renewable Generation and Price Uncertainty. EMO Bilimsel Dergi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 3, 37–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/1390242

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. M’hamed, R., Youcef, H., Bousmaha, B., Mouaadh, Y.,“Energy management of photovoltaic plant for smart street lighting system”, Energy Engineering, 122(12):4899-4918, (2025).
  2. Ye, W., Huang, S., Herdem, M.S., Sun, W., Nathwani, J., Wen, J.,“Transformer-based predictive energy management in hydrogen-integrated renewable systems”, Energy, 341:139474, (2025).
  3. Zhang, L., Feng, G., Li, A., Bi, Y., Huang, K., Wang, Z., Chang, S., Liu, Y.,“An optimized energy management strategy for wing-PV hybrid heat pump systems with dual storage: enhancing power-to-load interaction”, Energy, 340:139046, (2025).
  4. Baran, E.,“A multi-criteria decision-making approach integrated with machine learning for energy resource supply”, Systems, 14(2):200, (2026).
  5. Chen, G., Wang, H., Zhang, C., Luo, L., Zhang, B.,“Research on composite micro-energy systems and adaptive energy management method”, Energy Conversion and Management:X, 28:101347, (2025).
  6. Ikeda, S., Ooka, R.,“Metaheuristic optimization methods for a comprehensive operating schedule of battery, thermal energy storage, and heat source in a building energy system”, Applied Energy, 151:192-205, (2015).
  7. Zhang, X., Xu, Y., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Zuo, Z., Guo, H., Huang, Y., Chen, H.,“A near-isothermal expander for isothermal compressed air energy storage system”, Applied Energy, 225:955-964, (2018).
  8. Bermudez, M.F.O., Cabrera, J.D.G., Montoya, O.D., Ramirez, D.A.G.,“Energy management system for battery banks in active distrivution networks using the arithmetic optimization algorithm”, Results in Engineering, 28:108259, (2025).
  9. Bouaziz, F., Abdelkafi, A., Masmoudi, A., Krichen, L.,“Energy management for hybrid building with grid-connected shared DC parking equipment with PV-energy storage system”, Journal of Building Engineering, 115:114534, (2025).
  10. Mazouzi, A., Hadroug, N., Hafaifa, A., Iratni, A., Colak, I.,“Particle swarm optimization of fuzzy logic-based energy management system for enhanced efficiency in fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles”, Sustainable Computing: Informatics and Systems, 48:101239, (2025).
  11. Baran, E.,“Deep learning-based detection and forecasting of performance losses in solar PV systems using multi-sensor data”, Applied Sciences, 16(4):1709, (2026).
  12. Siluk, J.C.M., Carvalho, P.S., Thomasi, V., Pappis, C.A.O., Schaefer, J.L.,“Cloud-based energy management systems: terminologies, concepts and definitions”, Energy Research & Social Science, 106:103313, (2023).
  13. Mezdi, K.E., Magri, A.E., Myasse, I.E., Watil, A., Bahatti, L., Elaadouli, N., Ouabi, H.,“Performance improvement through nonlinear control design and power management of a grid-coneected wind-battery hybrid energy storage system”, Results in Engineering, 20:101491, (2023).
  14. Modu, B., Abdullah, M.P., Bukar, A.L., Hamza, M.F., Adewolu, M.S.,“Energy management and capacity planning of photovoltaic-wind-biomass energy system considering hydrogen-battery storage”, Journal of Energy Storage, 73:109294, (2023).
  15. Quintero, J.F.F., Robles, R.V., Martinez, S.B., Escolar, M.C., Miracle, D.M.,“A flexibility management system for behind-the-meter flexibility with distributed energy resources: a sensitivity analysis”, Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 60:103404, (2023).
  16. Tong, W., Lu, Z., Hunt, J.D., Zhao, H., Han, M., Zhao, G.,“Energy management system for modular-gravity energy stırage plant”, Journal of Energy Storage, 74:109283, (2023).
  17. Molu,, R.J.J., Naoussi, S.R.D., Wira, P., Mbasso, W.F., KEnfack, S.T., Kamel, S.,“Optimization-based energy management system for grid-connected photovoltaic/battery microgrids under uncertainty”, Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 8:100464, (2023).
  18. Javid, S.S.M., Derakhshan, G., Hakimi, S.M.,“Energy scheduling in a smart energy hub system with hydrogen storage systems and electrical demand management”, Journal of Building Engineering, 80:108129, (2023).
  19. Taye, B.A., Choudhury, N.B.D.,“Adaptive filter based method for hybrid energy storage system management in DC microgrid”, Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 5:100259, (2023).
  20. Hu, Y., Q., L., Gu, F., Fathi, G.,“Comprehensive energy system optmization using developed coyote algorithm for effective management of battery, heat source and thermal storage”, Energy Reports, 10:4218-4230, (2023).
  21. Baran, E., KorkusuzPolat, T.,“Classification of industry 4.0 for total quality management: a review”, Sustainability, 14(6):3329, (2022).
  22. KorkusuzPolat, T., Baran, E.,“A blockchain-based quality 4.0 application for warehouse management system”, Applied Sciences, 14(23):10950, (2024).