Journals / Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2

Knowledge Status of Nursing Students Regarding Hemodynamic Monitoring with Noninvasive Methods

Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin Noninvaziv Yöntemlerle Hemodinamik İzleme İlişkin Bilgi Durumları

Filiz Özel Çakır(KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8862-3514
Canan Kaş(KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1637-0690
Mahinur Durmuş(KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0050-6680
Pages
223–230
Publication Date
2026-08-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When analyzing the correct answer rates by grade level, it was found that second-grade students had the highest correct answer rate for question 1; fourth-grade students had the highest correct answer rate for question 4; and second- and third-grade students had the highest correct answer rates for questions 6 and 9.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study was conducted to determine the status of knowledge of nursing students about hemodynamic monitoring with noninvasive methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample for the study was collected online using a Google survey from second-, third-, and fourth-year nursing students between September 15, 2023, and December 31, 2023.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When analyzing the correct answer rates by grade level, it was found that second-grade students had the highest correct answer rate for question 1; fourth-grade students had the highest correct answer rate for question 4; and second- and third-grade students had the highest correct answer rates for questions 6 and 9.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Nusing · students · noninvasive methods

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine the status of knowledge of nursing students about hemodynamic monitoring with noninvasive methods. Methods: This research is descriptive type research. The sample for the study was collected online using a Google survey from second-, third-, and fourth-year nursing students between September 15, 2023, and December 31, 2023. Data were collected using the “Socio-demographic Characteristics Form and Information Form on Hemodynamic Monitoring with Noninvasive Methods” developed by the researchers. The sample of the study consisted of 202 nursing students. Results: It was determined that 75.7% of the nursing students participating in the study were female and 41.6% were 2nd year students. 47% of the students correctly defined the definition of hemodynamic monitoring and 78.7% correctly defined the steps of hemodynamic monitoring. When the knowledge status of the students in hemodynamic monitoring parameters was examined, it was determined that blood pressure (88.6%) was the highest and body temperature was the lowest (48.5%). When analyzing the correct answer rates by grade level, it was found that second-grade students had the highest correct answer rate for question 1; fourth-grade students had the highest correct answer rate for question 4; and second- and third-grade students had the highest correct answer rates for questions 6 and 9. When analyzing differences in answer accuracy based on whether students had completed an internship in the intensive care unit, it was determined that students who had not completed an internship gave more correct answers to the first question, while students who had completed an internship gave more correct answers to the fifth question. Conclusion: In conclusion, nursing students have been found to have gaps in their knowledge regarding hemodynamic monitoring using noninvasive methods; to address these gaps, it is recommended that educational activities such as simulation exercises and case discussions be increased prior to clinical practice courses.

Özet

Amaç: Bu araştırma, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin noninvaziv yöntemlerle hemodinamik izleme ilişkin bilgi durumlarının belirlenmesi amacıyla gerçekleştirildi. Yöntem: Bu araştırma, tanımlayıcı tipte bir araştırmadır. Araştırmanın örneklemi, 15 Eylül 2023-31 Aralık 2023 tarihleri arasında ikinci, üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf hemşirelik öğrencilerinden Google anketi kullanılarak çevrimiçi olarak toplandı. Veriler araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen “Birey Tanıtım Formu ve Noninvaziv Yöntemlerle Hemodinamik İzleme İlişkin Bilgi Formu” kullanılarak toplandı. Araştırmanın örneklemini 202 hemşirelik öğrencisi oluşturdu. Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan hemşirelik öğrencilerinin %75,7'sinin kadın ve %41,6'sının 2. sınıf öğrencisi olduğu belirlendi. Öğrencilerin %47’si hemodinamik izlemin tanımını, %78,7’si hemodinamik izlem basamaklarını doğru tanımladı. Öğrencilerin hemodinamik izlem parametrelerinde bilgi düzeylerine bakıldığında kan basıncı (%88,6) en yüksek, vücut sıcaklığı en düşük (%48,5) bilgi düzeyi olduğu belirlendi. Sınıf seviyelerine göre doğru cevap oranları analiz edildiğinde; 1 numaralı soruda en yüksek doğru cevap oranının ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinde olduğu; 4 numaralı soruda en yüksek doğru cevap oranının dördüncü sınıf öğrencilerinde olduğu ve 6 ve 9 numaralı sorularda en yüksek doğru cevap oranlarının ikinci ve üçüncü sınıf öğrencilerinde olduğu bulundu. Öğrencilerin yoğun bakım ünitesinde staj yapıp yapmadıklarına göre cevap doğruluğundaki farklılıklar analiz edildiğinde ise; staj yapmamış öğrencilerin 1. soruya daha fazla doğru cevap verdiği ve staj yapmış öğrencilerin 5. soruya daha fazla doğru cevap verdiği belirlendi. Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, hemşirelik öğrencilerinin noninvaziv yöntemlerle hemodinamik izleme yönelik eksiklikler yaşadığı, bu eksikliklerin giderilmesi için klinik uygulama dersleri öncesi simülasyon uygulamaları, vaka tartışması gibi eğitimlerin arttırılması önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çakır, F. Ö., Kaş, C., Durmuş, M. (2026). Knowledge Status of Nursing Students Regarding Hemodynamic Monitoring with Noninvasive Methods. Ege Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.53490/egehemsire.1723016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (35)

  1. Alkhelaiwi, W. A., Traynor, M., Rogers, K., Wilson, I. (2024). Assessing the Competence of Nursing Students in Clinical Practice: The Clinical Preceptors’ Perspective. Healthcare, 12(10), 1031.
  2. Altun, N., Altun Uğraş, G., Yüksel, S. (2022). The Effect of Training to Nurses Working at Emergency Department on Pulse Oximetry Knowledge. Health Academy Kastamonu, 7(2), 246-259.
  3. Beltrame, M., Bellan, M., Patrucco, F., Gavelli, F. (2025). Non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients: A guide for emergency physicians. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(19), 7002.
  4. Brezić, J., Kurtović, B., Friganović, A. (2021). Levels of knowledge in nursing students on hemodynamic monitoring: A cross-sectional study. Croatian Nursing Journal, 5(1), 29–39.
  5. Bülbül, A., Selalmaz, M., Kunt, A., Demirel, Ş., Uslu, H.S. (2014). Pediatric health care providers’ knowledge about patient follow-up with pulse oximetry. Med.Bull. Sisli Etfal Hosp., 48(4), 303-307.
  6. Cain, C. (2018). Choosing Wisely for Monitoring Patients. Am J Crit Care, 27(1), 51.
  7. Cove, M.E., Pinsky, M.R. (2012). Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol., 26(4), 453-462.
  8. Cutuli, S.L., See, E.J., Osawa, E.A., Ancona, P., Marshall, D., Eastwood, G.M., Glassford, N.J., Bellomo, R. (2021). Accuracy of non-invasive body temperature measurement methods in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Resusc., 23(1), 6-13.
  9. Çelik, Y., Karadaş, C., Akdağ, C., Özkeçeci, G. (2015). Evaluation of ECG Knowledge of the employees in the Emergency and Intensive Care Nurses. Turk Soc Cardiol Turkish Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 6(9), 75-85.
  10. Çetinkaya, B., Turan, T., Ceylan, S.S., Altundağ, S. (2008). Knowledge Levels of Pulse Oximetry UsageAmong Pediatric Ward Nurses' and Physicians'. ADÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(2), 25-28.
  11. Çevik, B., Kılıç, G., Kav, S., Karahan, A., Karaaslan Eşer, A., Doğan, N. (2020). Nurses's Knowledge Status And Difficulties About Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Measurement. Journal of Intensive Care Nursing, 24(2), 89-98.
  12. De Meulenaere, S. (2007). Pulse oximetr: uses and limitations. JNP, 3(5), 312-317.
  13. Dönmez, L. (2015). Usability Of Theoretical Knowledge Level On Measurement Of Blood Pressure Among Adult Subjects As An Indicator For Evaluation Of The Medical Education. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 14(43), 75-82.
  14. Erdal, E. (1989). Çocuklarda beden ısısının ölçülmesi. EGEHFD, 5(1), 38-42.
  15. Ergin, E., Alcan, A.O., Zaman, F. (2022). Intensive Care Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitudes And Behaviors Regarding Central Venous Pressure Measurement. IDUHES, 5(2), 379-390.
  16. Eyüboğlu, T.Ş., Güleryüz, O.D., Keleş, E., Budakoğlu, I.İ. (2018). What do intern doctors know about the use of pulse oximetry in pediatric patients?. GMJ., 29(2), 119-122.
  17. Giannetta, N., Campagna, G., Di Muzio, F., Di Simone, E., Dionisi, S., Di Muzio, M. (2020). Accuracy and knowledge in 12-lead ECG placement among nursing students and nurses: a web-based Italian study. Acta Biomed., 91(12-S), e2020004.
  18. Jeshvaghani, T. A., Nikravan Mofard, B., Farahani, B., Nasiri, S. (2021). Nurses’ educational needs assessment for hemodynamic monitoring in intensive care units. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 41(3), 169–175.
  19. Kajander-Unkuri, S., Meretoja, R., Katajisto, J., Saarikoski, M., Salminen, L., Suhonen, R., Leino-Kilpi, H. (2014). Self-assessed level of competence of graduating nursing students and factors related to it. Nurse Educ Today, 34(5), 795-801.
  20. Karahan, A., Kav, S. (2018). Professional Competency in Nursing. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, 5(2), 160-168.
  21. Keskin Kızıltepe, S., Kurtgöz, A., Keskin, H. (2023). Hemşirelik Eğitiminde verilen temel elektrokardiyografi dersinin klinik yansımaları: Nitel bir Çalışma. Turk J Cardiovasc Nurs., 14(34), 68-75.
  22. Kim, S.O., Choi, Y.J. (2019). Nursing competency and educational needs for clinical practice of Korean nurses. Nurse Educ Pract., 34, 43-47.
  23. Kömeağaç, A., Bektaş, A. (2018). Effect of the evidence-based pediatric fever management training given to nursing students. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(2), 860-867.
  24. Mirus, M., Saugel, B., Spieth, P.M. (2026). Hemodynamic monitoring: basic principles in operation room and intensive care unit. J Clin Monit Comput., 40(2), 375-389.
  25. Nibbelink, C.W., Young, J.R., Carrington, J.M., Brewer, B.B. (2018). Informatics Solutions for Application of Decision-Making Skills. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am., 30(2), 237-246.
  26. Oktay, A.A., Yel, F., Gülpak, M., Uzun H., Önal, Ö. (2017). Knowledge Levels Of The Vital Signs Of Nursing Students. KSU Medical Journal, 12(2), 21-27.
  27. Özışık, O., Sayhan, M.B., Salt, Ö. (2020). 112 The Knowledge, Attitude and Behaviorus of 112 Emergency Medical Personnel About Electrocardiography. JAREN, 6(1), 8-13.
  28. Pour-Ghaz, I., Manolukas, T., Foray, N., Raja, J., Rawal, A., Ibebuogu, U.N., Khouzam, R.N. (2019). Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?. Ann Transl Med., 7(17), 421.
  29. Robinson, B.K., Dearmon, V. (2013). Evidence-based nursing education: effective use of instructional design and simulated learning environments to enhance knowledge transfer in undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 29(4), 203-209.
  30. Sessler D. I. (2016). Perioperative thermoregulation and heat balance. Lancet (London, England), 387(10038), 2655–2664.
  31. Sökün, D., Gözen, D. (2017). Pediatric Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Fever and Fever Management. F.N.J.N., 25(1), 21-30.
  32. Summers, R.L., Pipke, M., Wegerich, S., Conkright, G. Isom, K.C. (2014). Functionality of empirical model-based predictive analytics for the early detection of hemodynamic instabilty. Biomed Sci Instrum., 50, 219-224.
  33. Terzioğlu, F., Yücel, Ç., Koç, G., Şimşek, Ş., Yaşar, B.N., Şahan, F.U….Yıldırım, S. (2016). A new strategy in nursing education: From hybrid simulation to clinical practice. Nurse Educ Today, 39, 104-108.
  34. Yildirim, M., Sahin, M. (2025). Evaluating undergraduate nursing education and student competencies: a mixed-methods study using the input–process–output framework. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 760.
  35. Zaybak, A., Güneş, Ü. (2007). Hemşirelerin indirekt arteriyel kan basıncı ölçüme yöntemleriyle ilgili gözlemsel bir çalışma. CÜ Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 11(3), 23-28.