SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 32

The Canonization of Tanach According to the Early Jewish Sources

ERKEN DÖNEM YAHUDİ KAYNAKLARINA GÖRE TANAH’IN KANONİZE EDİLMESİ

Eldar HASANOĞLU
Pages
25–48
Publication Date
2015-12-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By the 19th century, different views were put

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Standardized text of theTanach, Jewish sacred book, is a result of process.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Early Jewish sources contains different information about the content of the Tanach.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By the 19th century, different views were put
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tanah · Kanonizasyon · Rabbani Kaynaklar

Abstract

Standardized text of theTanach, Jewish sacred book, is a result of process. Early Jewish sources contains different information about the content of the Tanach. The issue of the canonic text in Judaism was left out through centuries. By the 19th century, different views were put

Özet

Yahudi kutsal kitabı Tanah’ın standart metin haline getirilmesi süreç içerisinde gerçekleşmiştir. Erken dönem Yahudi kaynaklarında Tanah’ın içeriğiyle ilgili farklı görüşler geçmektedir. Yahudilikte kanon meselesi asırlar boyunca tartışma konusu olmamıştır. XIX. yüzyıldan itibaren kanonizasyonun ne zaman gerçekleştiği konusunda farklı görüşler dile getirilmiştir. Bir kitabın kanonik listeye alınması sırasında rabbiler tarafından dile getirilen söylemlerde dinî, mezhepsel ve asabiyetçi kaygıların hâkim olduğu görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı erken dönem Yahudi kaynaklarda Tanah’ın standart metni ve rabbilerin kanon algısı meselelerini tanıtmak, XIX -XX. yüzyıla ait kanonizasyonla ilgili görüşleri sunmaktır. Sonuç kısmında kanonizasyonla ilgili kanaatimiz beyan edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HASANOĞLU, E. (2015). The Canonization of Tanach According to the Early Jewish Sources. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 32, 25–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/138733

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Adam, Baki, Yahudi Kaynaklarına Göre Tevrat, İstanbul: Pınar Yay., 2001.
  2. Alexander, Philip S., “The Parting of the Ways From the Perspective of Rabbinic Judaism”, Jews and Christians: The Parting of the Ways A.D. 70 to 135, ed. James D.G. Dunn, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1992, 1-26.
  3. Alon, Gedalyahu, Toldot ha-Yehudim be-eretz Yisrael be-tkufat ha-Mişna ve ha-Talmud, Bney Barak: Hotzaat ha-Kibutz ha-Meuhad, 1989,
  4. I. Aune, D.E., “On the Origins of the Council of Javneh Myth”, Journal of Biblical Litera- ture, 110: 3 (1991), 491-493.
  5. Bade, W. Frederic, “The Canonization of the Old Testament”, The Biblical World, 37: 3 (1911), 151-162.
  6. Beckwith, Roger T., The Old Testament Canon of the New Testament Church and its Background in Early Judaism, London: SPCK, 1985. “Ben La’anah”, Jewish Encyclopedia, http://jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/2880-ben- la-anah, (03.10.2014)
  7. Broyde, Michael, “Defilement of the Hands, Canonization of the Bible, and the Spe- cial Status of Esther, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Songs”, Judaism: a Quarterly Jo- urnal (http://www.thefreelibrary.com) (03.10.2014). Life and Thought, 44: 1 (1995), 65-79
  8. Buhl, Frants, Kanon und Text des Alten Testamentes, Leipzig: Akademische Buchhand- lung, 1891. Chapman, Stephen B., “Canon: Old Testament” The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Books of the Bible, ed. Michael D. Coogan, New York: Oxford UP, 96-109.
  9. Chapman, Stephen, “The Canon Debate: What It Is and Why It Matters”, Journal of Theological Interpretation, 4: 2 (2010), 273-294.
  10. Charles, R.H. The Apocrypha and the Pseudepygrapha of the Old Testament I-II, Oxford: Clarendon, 1913.
  11. Childs, Brevard S., Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments, Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1992.
  12. Christie, W.M., “The Jamnia Period in Jewish History”, The Journal of Theological Stu- dies, 26:104 (1925), 347-364.
  13. Collins, John J., Seers, Sibyls, and Sages in Hellenistic-Roman Judaism, Brill, 2001. Complete works of Josephus, tr. Syvert Havercamp, New York: Bigelow-Brown&Co., 1844, vol. IV. Cross, Frank Moore, From Epic to Canon: History and Literature in Ancient Israel, Balti- more: The John Hopkins UP, 2000.
  14. Dunbar, David, “The Biblical Canon”, Hermeneutics Authority and Canon, ed. D.A. Carson, J. Woodbridge, Eugene: Wipf&Stock Publishers, 2005. Religion, 8 (1979), 135-142.
  15. Maori, Yeshayahu, “Rabbinic Midrash as Evidence for Textual Variants in the Heb- rew Bible: History and Practice”, Modern Scholarship in the Study of Torah: Cont- ributions and Limitation, ed. Shalom Ca