SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 42

Adaptation of Character and Values as Global Citizens Assessment Questionnaire into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study

Dünya Vatandaşlığı İçin Karakter ve Değerler Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Dilek KARIŞAN
Özgül YILMAZ TÜZÜN
Pages
74–85
Publication Date
2017-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study provided a valid and reliable Turkish version of CVGCA questionnaire for future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to generate a Turkish version of the Character and Values as Global Citizens Assessment (CVGCA) questionnaire originally developed by Lee, Yoo, Choi, Kim, Krajcik, Herman and Zeidler (2013).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Turkish version of the scale was administered to 241 junior and senior pre-service science teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study provided a valid and reliable Turkish version of CVGCA questionnaire for future studies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sosyobilimsel konular · karakter eğitimi · Değerler Eğitimi

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to generate a Turkish version of the Character and Values as Global Citizens Assessment (CVGCA) questionnaire originally developed by Lee, Yoo, Choi, Kim, Krajcik, Herman and Zeidler (2013). The CVGCA questionnaire composed of three structural characteristics -ecological worldview, social and moral compassion, and socioscientific accountability. The Turkish version of the scale was administered to 241 junior and senior pre-service science teachers. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted and produced a four factor structure for the Turkish version of the CVGCA questionnaire that included: sustainable development, empathetic concerns, moral and ethical sensitivity, and willingness to act. In order to check the factor structure explored by EFA, the CFA analysis was followed. CFA analysis confirmed the four factor structures found in EFA analysis. This study provided a valid and reliable Turkish version of CVGCA questionnaire for future studies.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Lee, Yoo, Choi, Kim, Krajcik, Herman ve Zeidler (2013) tarafından geliştirilen Dünya Vatandaşlığı İçin Karakter ve Değerler Ölçeği’nin (DVKDÖ)Türkçe uyarlaması geçerlik ve güvenirlik araştırmasını yapmaktır. Ölçek üç yapısal karakteristiğe sahiptir; ekolojik dünya görüşü, toplumsal ve ahlaki merhamet, ve sosyobilimsel hesap verebilirlik. Ölçek fen bilgisi öğretmenliği programında öğrenim görmekte olan 241 adet üçüncü ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencisine uygulanmıştır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonucuna göre ölçek sürdürülebilir kalkınma, empatik endişeler, ahlaki ve etik duyarlılık, harekete geçme isteği olmak üzere dört alt boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizinde ortaya çıkan boyutları test etmek için doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarının da dört boyutu desteklediği ( faktör analiz sonuçları 1 den 4 e sırası ile: 0.70, 0.70, 0.45, ve 0.53) görülmüştür. Bu çalışma literatüre Dünya vatandaşlığı için karakter ve değerler ölçeğinin geçerli ve güvenilir bir uyarlama örneği sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARIŞAN, D., TÜZÜN, Ö. Y. (2017). Adaptation of Character and Values as Global Citizens Assessment Questionnaire into Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 42, 74–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/138520

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Baumgartner, H., ve Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161.
  2. Berkowitz, M.W., ve Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. D.L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117–138).
  3. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  4. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., Pinch, T., ve Douglas, D. G. (2012). The social construction of Technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT press. Boyes, E., Skamp, K., ve Stanistreet, M. (2009). Australian secondary students’ views about Global warming: Beliefs about actions, and willingness to act. Research in Science Education, 39, 661–680.
  5. Browne, M. W., ve Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. K. A. Bollen ve J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136 –162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re‐conceptualization of Scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697.
  6. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multi-dimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10 (p.85). Davies, L., ve Pike, G. (2008).
  7. Global citizenship education. R, Lewin (Ed.), Handbook of practice and research in study abroad: Higher education and the quest for global citizenship, (61-78). United Kingdom: Routledge DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications New York: Sage publications. European Comission (2015). Science Education for Responsible Citizenship. İnternet’ten 20 Kasım 2016’da http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf adresinden alınmıştır. Frankel, J.R.,ve Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (6th ed.) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Fowler, S.R., Zeidler, D.L., ve Sadler, T.D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(2), 279-296.
  8. Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross- cultural assessment, 1, 3-38.
  9. Hambleton, R. K.,ve Pat