SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 23

The Relationship Between Achievement Responsibility and Achievement Anxiety in relation to Psychopathological Symptoms

Başarı Sorumluluğunun ve Başarı Kaygısının Psikopatolojik Belirtilerle İlişkisinin Belirlenmesi1

Necla ACUN KAPIKIRAN
Pages
140–149
Publication Date
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that the stepwise regression analyses predicted significant relationship between General Symptom Index and Intellectual Achievement Responsibility, Achievement Anxiety Testing and gender.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between Intellectual Achievement Responsibility and Achievement Anxiety in relation to psychological symptoms has been analyzed by using a survey method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample population consisted of 594 ( 302 female and 286 male) high school students (1-2-3.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that the stepwise regression analyses predicted significant relationship between General Symptom Index and Intellectual Achievement Responsibility, Achievement Anxiety Testing and gender.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Başarı Sorumluluğu · Başarı Kaygısı · Psikopatolojik Belirti ve Ergenlik

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between Intellectual Achievement Responsibility and Achievement Anxiety in relation to psychological symptoms has been analyzed by using a survey method. The sample population consisted of 594 ( 302 female and 286 male) high school students (1-2-3. Grades). To measure the Locus of Control in Academic Situations, Intellectual Achievement Responsibility Questionnaire (IAR), to determine the Anxiety in Academic Situations, Achievement Anxiety Testing (AAT) and to measure Psychopathology, Symptom Check List (SCL-90-R) has been used. The results suggest that the stepwise regression analyses predicted significant relationship between General Symptom Index and Intellectual Achievement Responsibility, Achievement Anxiety Testing and gender. The analyses of variance results put forth the groups of General Symptom Index have significantly caused the difference in both IARt and AAT.

Özet

Bu çalışmada zihinsel başarı sorumluluğu ve başarı kaygısının psikopatolojik belirtilerle ilişkisi tarama yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Lise öğrencilerinin (1-2-3. Sınıf) oluşturduğu 594 kişi (308 kız ve 286 erkek) örneklem grubunu oluşturmaktadır. Akademik durumlardaki denetim odağını ölçmek için Zihinsel Başarı Sorumluluğu (ZBS) ölçeği, akademik durumlardaki kaygıyı belirlemek için Başarı Kaygısı Ölçeği (BKÖ) ve psikopatolojik belirtiyi ölçmek için Belirti Tarama Listesi (SCL-90-R) kullanılmıştır. Bulgulara göre, genel belirti düzeyinin ZBSt, BKÖ ve cinsiyet değişkenleriyle gerçekleştirilen aşamalı regresyon analizine göre, genel belirti düzeyinin bu değişkenlerle ilişkisini anlamlı olarak yordanabilmiştir. Yine, genel belirti grupları hem ZBSt hem de BKÖ arasında fark yarattığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPIKIRAN, N. A. (2008). The Relationship Between Achievement Responsibility and Achievement Anxiety in relation to Psychopathological Symptoms. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 23, 140–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/138444

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Albert, R. ve Haber, R.N. (1960).Anxiety in academic achievement situations. (Eds.) R.N. Haber, Current Research Motivation, 586-597.
  2. Ashkanasy, N.M. (1985). Rotter’s internal-external zcale: Confirmatory factor analyses and correlation with social desirability for alternative scale formats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(5)1328-1341.
  3. Balcı, A. (1995). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma. Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara:
  4. TDFO Bil. Yay. Baron, R. A. Byrne, D (1984). Socia lpsychology: understanding human interaction. Boston: Allyn and Baconc Inc. Carrier, C.,Higson, V., Klimoski, V. ve Peterson, E. (1984). The effects of facilitative and debilitative achievement anxiety on note-taking. Journal of Educational Research, 77 (3)133-138.
  5. Chapin, T.J. (1989). The relationship of trait anxiety and academic performance to achievement anxiety: student at risk. Journal of College Student Development 30, 229-236.
  6. Cohen, L.H., Burt, C.E. ve Björk, J.B. (1987). Life stress and adjustment: effects of life events experienced by young adolescents and their parents. Developmental Psychology, 23(4) 583-592. Cole,T. ve Sapp, G.L. (1988). Stress, locus of control and achievement of high school seniours. PsychologyReports,63(2)355-359.
  7. Coleman, J.C. ve Broen, W. E. (1972). Abnormal Psychology and Modern Life. U.S.A: Scott, Foresman and Company Crandall, V.C., Katkovsky, W. ve Crandall, V.J. (1965). Children’s beliefs in their own control of reinforcements in intellectual- academic achievement situations. Child Development, 36, 91-109.
  8. Dağ, İ. (1992). Kontrol odağı, öğrenilmiş güçlülük ve psikopatoloji. Psikoloji Dergsi, 7(27), 1-9.
  9. Deci, E.L.; Benware, C. ve Landy, D. (1992). The attribution of motivation as a function of output and reward. (Eds.) A.K. Boggiano ve T.S. Pittman. Achievement and Motivation, CambridgeUniversity Press.
  10. Doherty W. J. ve Baldwin, C. (1985). Shifts and stability in locus of control during the 1970’s: rivergence of the sexes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 4, 1084-1053.
  11. Dusek, J.B.( 1987).Adolesencent Development and Behavior. Prentice-Hall Inc.1.Ed. NewJersey., Eisen, J.A., Pollio, H.R. ve Milton, O. (1986).Educational and personal characteristics of four different types of learning and grade-oriented students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, (57) 54-67.
  12. Fibel, L.M. ve Hale, W.D. (1978). The generalized expectancy for success scale. a new measure.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 (5) 24-931.