SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16

Realibility and Validity of İdeal and Real Self-Concept Scale

İdeal ve Gerçek Benlik Kavramı Ölçeğinin Güvenirliği ve Geçerliği

Necla KAPIKIRAN ACUN
Pages
14–25
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that item-total correlations has changed between .33 and. 81 ranges and principal compenents analysis explained three faktörs for the scales.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study reported reliability and validity studies of the Ideal and Real Self-Concept Qustionnnaires (IRSCQ) developed by Waugh (2001), to measure the ideal and real self-concepts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample 488 (III practice) and 140 (I and II practices) of university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that item-total correlations has changed between .33 and. 81 ranges and principal compenents analysis explained three faktörs for the scales.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study reported reliability and validity studies of the Ideal and Real Self-Concept Qustionnnaires (IRSCQ) developed by Waugh (2001), to measure the ideal and real self-concepts. The sample 488 (III practice) and 140 (I and II practices) of university students. The results showed that item-total correlations has changed between .33 and. 81 ranges and principal compenents analysis explained three faktörs for the scales. The analysis also pointed out .85 and .83 test re-test reliabilities correlations and .37 correlation was found with Offer Self image Questionnaire ( İnanç, 1989) for concurrent validity of real self-concept questionnaire. Results has been discussed in detail.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Waugh (2001) tarafından geliştirilen ideal ve gerçek benlik kavramı ölçeklerinin güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışmaları verilmiştir. Örneklem 488 (Ill.uygulama) ve 104 (I ve II uygulamalar) üniversite öğrencisini içermektedir. Sonuçlar; madde-toplam korelasyonun .33 ve .81 arasında değiştiği ve ölçeklerin üçer faktörden oluştuğu saptanmıştır. Test tekrar test güvenirlikleri .85 ve .83 olarak hesaplanmıştır ve gerçek benlik kavramı ölçeğinin Offer Benlik İmajı ölçeği ile uyum geçerliği sonuçları .37 bulunmuştur. Sonuçlar ayrıca tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACUN, N. K. (2022). Realibility and Validity of İdeal and Real Self-Concept Scale. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 16, 14–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/587331

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akkoyun, F. ve Ersever, H. (1989) " İdeal Benliğin Değerlendirilmesi"A.Ü. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 22-2, 675-685.
  2. Balcı, A.(1995) Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma, 72tdfoYay 1.Baskı.Ankara Beck, A.T; Steer, R.A.;Epstein, N. and Brown, G. (1990) "Beck Self-Concept Test: Psychological Assessment" A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2-2, 191-197.
  3. Bong, M. and Clark, R. E. (1999) " Comparision between Self-Cooncept and Self-Efficacy in Academic Motivation Research" Educational Psychologist, 34-3, 139-154.
  4. Ellis-Hill, C.S.and Horn, S. ( 2000) " Change in Identity and Self-Concept: A New Theoretical Approach to Recovery Following a Stroke" Clinical Rehabilitaion, 14-3, 279-287.
  5. Frisby, C.L. and Tucker, CM. (1993) "Black Children's Perceptions of Self: Implications for Educators" The Educational Form, 57, 146-156
  6. Gezici, M. ve Güvenç, G. ( 2003) "Çalışan Kadınların ve Ev Kadınlarının Benlik Algısı ve Benlik Kurgusu Açısından Karşılaştırılması" Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 18-51, 1-18.
  7. Guay, F.; Marsh, H.W. and Boiven, M. (2003) "Academic Self-Concept and Academic Success: Developmental Perspectives on Causal Ordering" Journal of Educational Psychology, 95-1, 124-136
  8. Hause, J.D. ( 1996) "Student Expectancies and Academic Self-Concept as Predictors of Science Achievement" Journal of Psychology, 130-6, 679-682. Hay,I.; Bryne, M. and Butler, C, (2000) "Evaluation of a Conflict-Resolution and Problem-Solving Programme to Enchance Adolesence' Self-Concept" Britsh Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 28-1, 161-174. İnanç,B. (1990) "Türk Ergenlerin Öz-İmajları" 5. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi, Özel Sayı. 8. 519-526. Loadman,W.E. ve Baştürk, R (2001) "The Reading Excellence Act Grant Application Process: Comprehensive Example of Applied Rasch Measurement" Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Med-Western Educaitonal Research Association, Chicago. IL. Marsh, H.W.; Smith, I.D.; Barnes,J. and Butler, S. (1983) "Self-Concept: ReUability, Stability, Dimensionality, Validity and the Measurent of Change" Journal of Educational Psychology, 75-5, 772-790. Marshall,H.H.(1989) "The Development of Self-Concept" Young Children, July,44-51.
  9. Martinot, D. And Monteil, J.M. (2000) "Use of the Self-Concept in Forming Preferences by French Students of Different Levels of Academic Achievement" Jornal of Social Psychology, 140-1, 119-232.
  10. Öner, N. (1996) Türkiye'de Kullanılan Psikolojik Testler, Boğaziçi Ün. Yay.2.Baskı, istanbul. Özdamar, K.( 1997) Paket Programlar ile İstatisti