SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 /

Investigation of the Relationship Between Argumentation Level and Decision Making Skills of Secondary School Students

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Argümantasyon Düzeyleri ile Karar Verme Becerileri Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Fatma TORUN
Pages
287–310
Publication Date
2019-09-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the result, positive and high-level (0.80) relationships were determined between students' argument levels and their decision-making skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the argument levels and decision-making skills of the students during the argumentation based social studies courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group of the research consisted of 33 7th grade students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the result, positive and high-level (0.80) relationships were determined between students' argument levels and their decision-making skills.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Argümantasyon · argüman düzeyi · karar verme becerisi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the argument levels and decision-making skills of the students during the argumentation based social studies courses. The study was carried out with action research, which is one of the qualitative research methods. The study group of the research consisted of 33 7th grade students. As data collection tools, five different activities were designed by the researcher. The data analysis was carried out at two phases. Firstly, the student’s argument levels were determined by The Argumentation Evaluation Scale and students' decision-making skills were determined by “Decision-Making Skill Evaluation Rubric”. Then the correlation between the two rubric scores was examined for each student. According to the result, positive and high-level (0.80) relationships were determined between students' argument levels and their decision-making skills.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, argümantasyon temelli yürütülen sosyal bilgiler dersinde öğrencilerin argüman düzeyleri ile karar verme becerileri arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemektir. Çalışma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden eylem araştırması ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 33 yedinci sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacı tarafından beş farklı etkinlik tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmada verilerin analizi iki aşamada gerçekleşmiştir. İlk olarak “Argümantasyon Değerlendirme Ölçeği” ile öğrencilerin argüman düzeyleri ve “Karar Verme Becerisi Değerlendirme Rubriği” ile öğrencilerin karar verme becerileri değerlendirilmiştir. Daha sonra her bir öğrencinin iki rubrikten aldıkları puanlara rasındaki korelasyon incelenmiştir. Sonuçlara göre öğrecnilerin argüman düzeyleri ve karar verme becerileri arasında pozitif ve yüksek düzey (0.80) ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TORUN, F. (2019). Investigation of the Relationship Between Argumentation Level and Decision Making Skills of Secondary School Students. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 287–310. https://ajindex.com/articles/138101

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Adair, J. (2000). Decision making and problem solving (N. Kalaycı, Trans.). Ankara:
  2. Gazi Publishing. Aymen Peker, E., Apaydın, Z., & Taş, E., (2012). Understanding of heat insulation with argumentation: Case study with primary 6th grade students. Dicle University Journal Institute of Social Secience, 4(8), 79-100.
  3. Basye, C., (2012). Decision-making behaviors of pre service teachers as they plan for social studies in elementary classrooms. (Doctor of Philosophy, Oregon State University). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. Butt, N., (2010). Argument construction, argument evaluation, and decision-making: A content analysis of argumentation and debate textbooks. (Doctor of Philosophy, Wayne State University, Michigan). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2011). Data analysis handbook for social sciences. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Akademi. Cho, K. L., (2001). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving in an online collaborative group problem-solving environment. (Doctor of Philosophy, The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Education, US). Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. Chowning, J. T., Griswold J. C., Kovarik, D. N., Collins, L. J., (2012). Fostering critical thinking, reasoning, and argumentation skills through bioethics education. PLoS ONE, 7(5). On 21 December 2013 http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036791 the page is accessed. Çalışkan, H. (2015). An investigation into the organization levels of social studies teachers with regard to constructivist learning environments in terms of several variables, Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 49-83.
  5. Demirbağ, M. & Günel, M. (2014). Integrating argument-based science inquiry with modal representations: Impact on science achievement, argumentation, and writing skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(1), 373-392.
  6. Doğan, Y. (2016). Hatıratlar (Anılar) ile sosyal bilgiler öğretimi. (Ed.: Halil Tokcan). Sosyal bilgilerde sözlü ve yazılı edebiyat incelemeleri (211-235), Ankara:Pegem Akademi. Engle, S. H. (2003). Decision making: The heart of social studies instruction, The Social Studies, 94(1), 7-10.
  7. Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J., (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933.
  8. Freeley, A. J.,& Steinb