Journals / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

In vitro evaluation of PLLA/PBS sponges as a promising biodegradable scaffold for neural tissue engineering

Pages
734–745
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest cell proliferation was observed for PLLA/PBS (3%, w/v, 2:1) scaffolds and this construct can be considered a promising biodegradable scaffold for neural tissue engineering.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In tissue engineering, the use of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA)/polybutylene succinate (PBS) blend for the construction of scaffold is very limited.
📊
Key Findings & Data:PLLA and PBS were blended in order to increase the processability and tune the crystallinity, porosity, and degradation rate of the resulted polymeric sponges.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest cell proliferation was observed for PLLA/PBS (3%, w/v, 2:1) scaffolds and this construct can be considered a promising biodegradable scaffold for neural tissue engineering.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In tissue engineering, the use of poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA)/polybutylene succinate (PBS) blend for the construction of scaffold is very limited. Moreover, polymeric sponges fabricated from PLLA/PBS have not been studied for neural tissue engineering. In the present study, the potential of the utility of PLLA/PBS polymeric sponges seeded with Schwann cells was investigated. PLLA and PBS were blended in order to increase the processability and tune the crystallinity, porosity, and degradation rate of the resulted polymeric sponges. These sponges were then seeded with Schwann cells. Porosity analysis showed that there were no significant differences between different compositions of PLLA/PBS blends; however, the porosity was slightly higher in PLLA/PBS (3%, w/v, 2:1) scaffold. Degradation profiles were also investigated for 120 days and almost 25% weight of PLLA/PBS (6%, 4%, 2%, w/v, 1:1) scaffolds and 18% weight of PLLA/PBS (3%, w/v, 2:1) scaffolds were lost at the end of 120 days. In vitro cell culture studies were also performed and the results proved that all PLLA/PBS blended scaffolds were biocompatible. The highest cell proliferation was observed for PLLA/PBS (3%, w/v, 2:1) scaffolds and this construct can be considered a promising biodegradable scaffold for neural tissue engineering.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖK, F. N., YÜCEL, D., KANNECİ, İ. A. A., TORUN, G. K. (2022). In vitro evaluation of PLLA/PBS sponges as a promising biodegradable scaffold for neural tissue engineering. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 734–745. https://ajindex.com/articles/600316

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Angelov DN, Ceynowa M, Guntinas-Lichius O, Streppel M, Grosheva M, Kiryakova SI, Skouras E, Maegele M, Irintchev A, Neiss WF et al. (2007). Mechanical stimulation of paralyzed vibrissal muscles following facial nerve injury in adult rat promotes full recovery of whisking. Neurobiol Dis 26: 229-242.
  2. Arphavasin S, Singhatanadgit W, Ngamviriyavong P, Janvikul W, Meesap P, Patntirapong S (2013). Enhanced osteogenic activity of a poly(butylene succinate)/calcium phosphate composite by simple alkaline hydrolysis. Biomed Mater 8: 055008. Augenlicht LH, Baserga R (1974). Changes in the G0 state of WI-38 fibroblasts at different times after confluence. Exp Cell Res 89: 255-262.
  3. Babensee JE, Anderson JM, McIntire LV, Mikos AG (1998). Host response to tissue engineered devices. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 33: 111-139.
  4. Bard J, Elsdale T (1986). Growth regulation in multilayered cultures of human diploid fibroblasts: the role of contact, movement and matrix production. Cell Tissue Kinet 19: 141-154.
  5. Blakemore WF (1977). Remyelination of CNS axons by Schwann cells transplanted from the sciatic nerve. Nature 266: 68-69.
  6. Bonassar LJ, Vacanti CA (1998). Tissue engineering: the first decade and beyond. J Cell Biochem 30: 297-303.
  7. Caldara G, Rigogliuso S, Pavia FC, Brucato V, Ghersi G (2014). Biocompatibility evaluation of PLLA scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology 119: 31. Can E, Udenir G, Kanneci AI, Kose G, Bucak S (2011). Investigation of PLLA/PCL blends and paclitaxel release profiles. AAPS PharmSciTech 12: 1442-1453.
  8. Casella GT, Wieser R, Bunge RP, Margitich IS, Katz J, Olson L, Wood PM (2000). Density dependent regulation of human Schwann cell proliferation. Glia 30: 165-177.
  9. Costa-Pinto AR, Martins AM, Castelhano-Carlos MJ, Correlo VM, Sol PC, Longatto-Filho A, Battacharya M, Reis RL, Neves NM (2014). In vitro degradation and in vivo biocompatibility of chitosan–poly(butylene succinate) fiber mesh scaffolds. J Bioact Compat Pol 29: 137-151.
  10. Coutinho DF, Gomes ME, Neves NM, Reis RL (2012). Development of micropatterned surfaces of poly(butylene succinate) by micromolding for guided tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 8: 1490-1497.
  11. Frostick SP, Yin Q, Kemp GJ (1998). Schwann cells, neurotrophic factors, and peripheral nerve regeneration. Microsurgery 18: 397-405.
  12. Hua K, Wang XW, Zhang W, Zhou J, Yang XB, Ji JH (2010). Cytocompatibility of PBS/PLA blend as the sternal fixation material. Journal of Southern Medical Universi